AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Time-blind friendly planning, executive function support, and daily structure for ADHD brains. Specializes in realistic time estimation, dopamine-aware task design, and building systems that actually work for neurodivergent minds.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
实测评分 未实测
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
A planning system designed BY and FOR ADHD brains. This skill understands that traditional productivity advice fails for neurodivergent minds and provides strategies that work WITH your brain, not against it.
ADHD is not a character flaw or lack of willpower. It's a difference in how the brain handles dopamine, time perception, and attention regulation. This skill:
Traditional Planning:
1. Make detailed plan
2. Follow plan
3. Achieve goal
ADHD Reality:
1. Make detailed plan (hyperfocus, feels great)
2. Plan feels constraining by day 2
3. Rebel against own plan
4. Feel guilty about abandoned plan
5. Avoid thinking about goal entirely
This skill breaks the paradox by creating FLEXIBLE structures with BUILT-IN pivots.
What time horizon are we planning?
├── RIGHT NOW (next 2 hours) → Emergency brain dump + single next action
├── TODAY → Time-blocked structure with transition buffers
├── THIS WEEK → Theme days + priority winnowing
├── THIS MONTH → Goal setting with anti-overwhelm safeguards
└── LONGER → Break into month-sized chunks, don't over-plan
Is the person in crisis mode?
├── YES → Skip planning, identify ONE smallest possible action
└── NO → Proceed with appropriate planning level
Is the person hyperfocusing on planning itself?
├── YES → Interrupt! Planning ≠ doing. Set timer, start ONE task.
└── NO → Continue planning support
Take your first estimate. Now:
"5 minutes" → Actually 15-20 minutes
"30 minutes" → Actually 1-1.5 hours
"A couple hours" → Actually half a day
"This weekend" → Actually won't happen without body doubling
The 3x Rule: Whatever you think it will take, multiply by 3. You're not bad at estimating—your brain processes time differently.
ADHD brains struggle with task transitions. BUILD IN BUFFERS:
Neurotypical Schedule:
9:00 - Meeting
10:00 - Deep work
12:00 - Lunch
ADHD-Friendly Schedule:
9:00 - Meeting
10:00 - [Transition buffer: bathroom, water, stare at wall]
10:15 - Deep work
11:45 - [Transition buffer: save work, prepare for context switch]
12:00 - Lunch
EVERYTHING IN MY HEAD RIGHT NOW:
_________________________________
_________________________________
_________________________________
_________________________________
NOW CIRCLE ONLY 1-3 THINGS THAT ACTUALLY MATTER TODAY.
Your daily plan is exactly 3 things:
That's it. Not 10 things. Not 5 things. THREE.
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ MORNING (Peak brain time for many - protect it!) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 9:00 - THE Thing (hardest/most important) │
│ [Use body doubling, website blockers, timer] │
│ 10:30 - TRANSITION BUFFER (10-15 min) │
│ 10:45 - Would Be Nice OR meetings │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ MIDDAY (Energy dip - don't fight it) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 12:00 - Lunch (actual break, not working lunch) │
│ 12:45 - Low-effort tasks: email, admin, organizing │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ AFTERNOON (Second wind for some) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 2:00 - Collaborative work, meetings, variety tasks │
│ 4:00 - Wrap up, tomorrow prep (5 min), shutdown ritual │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
The 2-Minute Start: Don't commit to finishing. Commit to 2 minutes.
Body Doubling: Work alongside someone (physically or virtually). The Focusmate app, Discord study groups, or just a friend on video call.
Temptation Bundling: Pair unpleasant tasks with pleasant ones.
ADHD working memory is limited. EXTERNALIZE EVERYTHING:
ADHD brains make thousands of micro-decisions that drain the battery:
Pre-decide:
You have doom boxes. Admit it. Those piles of stuff you don't know what to do with.
Weekly Doom Box Protocol (15 min max):
❌ Detailed long-term planning - You'll abandon it and feel bad ❌ Guilt-based motivation - Creates avoidance, not action ❌ "I'll remember" - You won't. Write it down. ❌ Willpower over systems - Systems > willpower every time ❌ Comparing to neurotypical productivity - Different brain, different metrics ❌ "Catching up" marathons - You'll burn out. Slow and steady. ❌ Perfect planning before starting - Planning paralysis. Start messy.
ADHD has high variance. Plan for BOTH:
Good Days (Hyperfocus Available):
Bad Days (Executive Function Depleted):
The key: Don't judge bad days. They're part of the pattern.
End of workday ritual to actually STOP working:
You are not broken. Your brain works differently. The goal isn't to become neurotypical—it's to build a life that works WITH your brain.
Progress over perfection. Compassion over criticism. Systems over willpower.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 評估回覆, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。