AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新
免费在 GitHub 公开
agent-harness-construction
Design and optimize AI agent action spaces, tool definitions, and observation formatting for higher completion rates.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法包含的文件（1）
- SKILL.md2.0 KB
SKILL.md（原文）
安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Agent Harness Construction
Use this skill when you are improving how an agent plans, calls tools, recovers from errors, and converges on completion.
Core Model
Agent output quality is constrained by:
- Action space quality
- Observation quality
- Recovery quality
- Context budget quality
Action Space Design
- Use stable, explicit tool names.
- Keep inputs schema-first and narrow.
- Return deterministic output shapes.
- Avoid catch-all tools unless isolation is impossible.
Granularity Rules
- Use micro-tools for high-risk operations (deploy, migration, permissions).
- Use medium tools for common edit/read/search loops.
- Use macro-tools only when round-trip overhead is the dominant cost.
Observation Design
Every tool response should include:
status: success|warning|errorsummary: one-line resultnext_actions: actionable follow-upsartifacts: file paths / IDs
Error Recovery Contract
For every error path, include:
- root cause hint
- safe retry instruction
- explicit stop condition
Context Budgeting
- Keep system prompt minimal and invariant.
- Move large guidance into skills loaded on demand.
- Prefer references to files over inlining long documents.
- Compact at phase boundaries, not arbitrary token thresholds.
Architecture Pattern Guidance
- ReAct: best for exploratory tasks with uncertain path.
- Function-calling: best for structured deterministic flows.
- Hybrid (recommended): ReAct planning + typed tool execution.
Benchmarking
Track:
- completion rate
- retries per task
- pass@1 and pass@3
- cost per successful task
Anti-Patterns
- Too many tools with overlapping semantics.
- Opaque tool output with no recovery hints.
- Error-only output without next steps.
- Context overloading with irrelevant references.
评价
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
评论
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问，或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
同一仓库的技能
Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新
12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 評估回覆, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新
Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新
Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新