AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新
免费在 GitHub 公开
ai-debt-detector
Use after generating code, after accepting AI suggestions, or when reviewing AI-written modules. Also use when code works but feels brittle, when error handling seems thin, when orphaned resources or missing cleanup are suspected, or when the agent claims done but hidden debt may exist. Catches the specific failure patterns AI agents produce that humans would not.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
实测评分 未实测
查看安装方法包含的文件（1）
- SKILL.md3.3 KB
SKILL.md（原文）
安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
AI Debt Detector
Overview
AI agents generate code that passes the happy path but hides debt: missing error handling, orphaned resources, ignored failure modes, hallucinated packages, silent architectural drift. This skill forces a targeted audit for the exact patterns AI agents get wrong.
When to Use
- After any AI code generation session (20+ lines produced)
- Before merging AI-generated PRs
- When code works but something feels off
- After vibe-coding sprints where debt accumulates fastest
- When the agent claims done without showing verification
Process
After code generation, scan for these AI-specific debt patterns:
-
FAILURE MODES - What happens when this fails?
- Network timeout? Disk full? Permission denied? Null input?
- Is there a try/catch? Does it catch SPECIFIC errors or swallow everything?
- Are resources cleaned up on failure? (streams closed, connections returned, temp files deleted)
-
ORPHANS - What gets created but never cleaned up?
- Temp files, event listeners, intervals, subscriptions, connections
- Are there corresponding cleanup/dispose/close calls for every open/create?
- In React: does every addEventListener have a removeEventListener in cleanup?
-
EDGE CASES - What inputs break this?
- Empty array/string? null/undefined? Multi-MB input? Unicode? Concurrent calls?
- Does the code assume the happy path? (AI almost always does)
-
HALLUCINATED DEPS - Do all imports actually exist?
- Is every package in package.json/requirements.txt?
- Are API methods real? (AI invents plausible-sounding methods that don't exist)
- Does this library's latest version still export this function?
-
ARCHITECTURAL DRIFT - Does this match the project's patterns?
- Same error handling style as existing code?
- Uses the project's established utilities (not reinventing)?
- Follows the file structure convention?
Red Flags (stop and fix immediately)
catch (e) {}orcatch (e) { console.log(e) }- swallowed error- No
finallyblock when resources were opened // TODO: handle error- AI's way of punting- Import from a path that doesn't exist in the project
- Timeout set but no abort/cleanup on timeout
- Database connection opened but never released back to pool
Common Mistakes
- Trusting that compilation means correctness (compilation checks syntax, not logic)
- Reviewing only the diff without checking what the AI did NOT generate (missing error paths)
- Assuming the AI used the right library version (it often uses deprecated APIs)
- Skipping the orphan check because garbage collection handles it (it doesn't for connections, listeners, timers)
Why This Exists
AI agents systematically optimize for "looks correct" and "passes the happy path." They miss failure modes, orphan resources, and hallucinate dependencies at rates significantly higher than manual code. This skill forces an audit for those specific blind spots.
评价
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
评论
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问，或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
同一仓库的技能
Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新
12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 評估回覆, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新
Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新
Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新