跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

notebooklm-management

NotebookLM MCP server management - query notebooks, add from share links, handle auth, reset sessions. Use when working with Google NotebookLM notebooks for conversational research tasks.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(3)

  • SKILL.md5.8 KB
  • CHANGELOG.md4.3 KB
  • LICENSE.txt1.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

NotebookLM MCP Management

Tech Stack Target / Version: NotebookLM current web release, Markdown session capture, and URL-tracked research workflows.

Use this skill when research should be grounded in NotebookLM notebooks instead of a generic web search.

  • Leverage native parallel subagent dispatch and 200k+ context windows where available.

Current MCP Reality

This repository already targets a real NotebookLM MCP workflow. The concrete tool surface available in this environment includes:

  • get_health
  • list_notebooks, search_notebooks, select_notebook
  • ask_question
  • add_notebook, update_notebook, remove_notebook
  • list_sessions, reset_session, close_session
  • setup_auth, re_auth, cleanup_data

Activation Conditions

Use symptom -> action triggers: when one matches, apply this skill and verify with the protocol below.

  • Querying a specific NotebookLM notebook
  • Adding a notebook from a share URL
  • Managing a notebook library or switching active notebooks
  • Recovering authentication or cleaning NotebookLM state
  • Continuing a multi-turn research session

Recommended Workflow

  1. Call get_health first to confirm authentication and server readiness.
  2. Reuse an existing session when the task is the same.
  3. Prefer search_notebooks or list_notebooks before asking the user to restate what is already in the library.
  4. Use ask_question iteratively in the same session for deep work.
  5. Use setup_auth or re_auth only when health indicates auth problems.

Library Management Rules

  • Do not add or remove notebooks without explicit user confirmation.
  • When adding a notebook, collect URL, description, topics, and use cases first.
  • Update metadata instead of creating duplicates when the notebook already exists.

Troubleshooting

  • Auth broken: get_health -> re_auth
  • Stale browser state: cleanup_data(preserve_library=true) after closing browsers
  • Wrong context: reset_session or switch notebooks
  • Ambiguous notebook choice: search the library before creating a new one

Anti-Patterns

  • Treating source content as already clean: Formatting automation will happily preserve broken or inconsistent input.
  • Skipping an open-file verification pass: Documents and spreadsheets often fail in the destination app, not in the script output.
  • Automating irreversible edits without checkpoints: A small mapping mistake can affect an entire workbook or document.

Verification Protocol

Before claiming "skill applied successfully":

  1. Pass/fail: The Notebooklm Management workflow names the agent boundary, delegated scope, and expected return artifact.
  2. Pass/fail: Context passed to helpers is minimal, task-local, and free of hidden expected answers.
  3. Pass/fail: Results are integrated only after evidence, diffs, or citations are checked by the controller.
  4. Pressure-test scenario: Run the workflow on two similar tasks that must not share assumptions or leaked context.
  5. Success metric: Zero context leakage; every delegated output is independently reviewable.

References & Resources

Documentation

Scripts

Examples

<!-- MCP:START --> <!-- PORTABILITY:START -->

Cross-Client Portability

This skill is written to stay usable across GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, and Codex.

  • GitHub Copilot: keep the folder in a Copilot-visible skill path or wrap the workflow in project instructions when folder discovery is unavailable.
  • Claude Code: keep the folder in a local skills directory or a compatible plugin source.
  • Codex: install or sync the folder into $CODEX_HOME/skills/notebooklm-management and restart Codex after major changes.
<!-- PORTABILITY:END -->

MCP Availability And Fallback

Preferred MCP Server: NotebookLM MCP

  • Fallback prompt: "Use the NotebookLM MCP Management skill without MCP. Rely on the local SKILL.md, bundled references or scripts, and manual verification. Show the exact commands, evidence, and final checks you used before concluding."
  • Use the NotebookLM web UI directly, capture answers in Markdown, and store session notes locally when the MCP server is unavailable.
  • Preserve notebook URLs, prompt history, and manual research notes so the workflow remains reproducible.
<!-- MCP:END -->

Related Skills

  • documentation-authoring: Use it when the workflow also needs drafting structured technical or product documents.
  • notion-docs: Use it when the workflow also needs Notion page and database publishing workflows.
  • pdf: Use it when the workflow also needs PDF extraction, generation, and layout-aware review.
  • word-document: Use it when the workflow also needs Word document authoring and formatting workflows.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 評估回覆, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

查看 bg-szy 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题