跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

benchmark-checklist

Design, review, or report a measured performance comparison. Use for benchmark methodology, speedup or regression claims, and performance-based choices; not generic performance discussion, ordinary dependency bumps, local renames, or prose edits.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(3)

  • SKILL.md2.8 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml229 B
  • LICENSE1.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Benchmark Checklist

Vet the claim against measured work. Use the existing benchmark harness and stay within the task's authority for runs, instrumentation, edits, and publication.

  1. State the claim, metric, units, workload, and comparison baseline. Read what the harness times, counts, and excludes. A requested quick estimate may use one run, labeled as such, but must still check errors and completed work. For that estimate, use the quick-estimate report below; steps 2–5 apply to comparisons. Choosing between options requires a comparison, not a quick estimate.
  2. Make the comparison fair: production builds and settings, matched versions, data, concurrency, cache state, warmup, and resources. Check machine load and load-generator saturation. Name untuned sides; do not select a winner from an unfair comparison.
  3. Verify correct output and count errors, timeouts, retries, and rejected work. Confirm work completed inside the timed region: await promises, consume lazy results, and verify requests, rows, or bytes actually reached their target.
  4. Identify the limiter with evidence; keep profiling overhead out of reported timings. Check physical throughput bounds and how much time the changed component could save. Investigate implausible results before reporting them.
  5. For a formal comparison, repeat each side at least five times, interleaving sides to reduce drift. Report the median and range using the harness's statistics where available. Treat differences within noise as no measurable difference. Relate microbenchmarks to the end-to-end path users wait on.

For a requested quick estimate, report the observed value, units, environment, reproduction command, errors and completed work, and label it as a single run without a comparison verdict. Missing correctness or work evidence makes even a quick estimate inconclusive.

For a formal comparison, finish with faster, slower, no measurable difference, or inconclusive; include run count, units, spread, environment, limiter evidence, and reproduction command. Mark missing correctness, work, fairness, or limiter evidence as inconclusive. Separate a measured result from an untested explanation. Stop when the claim is supported at its stated scope or the remaining evidence gap is explicit.

Adapted from Lauren Tan's pstack benchmark-checklist, under the MIT license.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

adhx

免费

Read public X/Twitter post URLs as structured evidence through the ADHX API. Use for relevant user-provided or research-discovered x.com, twitter.com, or adhx.com links. ADHX does not search X, and long-form Article content may be incomplete.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

bioinformatist/codex-base92026年10月16日 更新

Trace what an actual code change could break beyond its diff when interfaces, serialized data, database schemas, configuration, caches, lifecycle ordering, or cross-language consumers are involved. Use for explicit impact analysis; not local renames, prose edits, ordinary dependency bumps, or generic architecture discussion.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

bioinformatist/codex-base92026年10月16日 更新

Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules, interfaces, seams, adapters, leverage, and locality. Use when designing or reshaping module boundaries, making code more testable, or evaluating interface depth.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

bioinformatist/codex-base92026年10月16日 更新

Plan or implement retirement of a system, API, feature, persisted configuration, or database shape. Use for compatibility cutovers, explicit deprecation review, or an explicit unreleased replacement decision, including determining whether consumers or data exist; not ordinary dependency bumps, local renames, prose edits, or generic architecture discussion.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

bioinformatist/codex-base92026年10月16日 更新

Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs, regressions, flaky failures, and performance problems with unclear cause. Use for root-cause debugging after a concrete symptom exists; do not use for routine implementation or speculative cleanup.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

bioinformatist/codex-base92026年10月16日 更新

Route requests for current library, framework, SDK, API, CLI, or cloud-service documentation through available documentation tools and primary sources.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

bioinformatist/codex-base92026年10月16日 更新

查看 bioinformatist 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题