Workflow for read alignment, sorting, indexing, mapping statistics, and downstream-ready alignment artifacts.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
End-to-end biomarker discovery workflow from expression data to validated biomarker panels. Covers feature selection with Boruta/LASSO, classifier training with nested CV, and SHAP interpretation. Use when building and validating diagnostic or prognostic biomarker signatures from omics data.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
实测评分 未实测
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Reference examples tested with: matplotlib 3.8+, numpy 1.26+, pandas 2.2+, scanpy 1.10+, scikit-learn 1.4+
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
pip show <package> then help(module.function) to check signaturesIf code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.
"Build a validated biomarker panel from my omics data" → Orchestrate feature selection (Boruta/LASSO), nested cross-validation classifier training, and SHAP interpretation to produce a robust, validated biomarker signature.
Complete pipeline from expression data to validated biomarker panels with classifier.
Expression matrix + Metadata
|
v
[1. Data Preparation] -----> StandardScaler, train/test split
|
v
[2. Feature Selection] ----> Boruta or LASSO stability selection
|
v
[3. Model Training] -------> RandomForest/XGBoost with nested CV
|
v
[4. Model Interpretation] -> SHAP values, feature importance
|
v
[5. Validation] -----------> Hold-out test, bootstrap CI
|
v
Validated biomarker panel + classifier
import pandas as pd
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
expr = pd.read_csv('expression.csv', index_col=0)
meta = pd.read_csv('metadata.csv', index_col=0)
X = expr.T # samples x genes
y = meta.loc[X.index, 'condition'].values
# test_size=0.2: Standard 80/20 split; use 0.3 for <100 samples
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(
X, y, test_size=0.2, stratify=y, random_state=42
)
# Fit scaler on training only to prevent data leakage
scaler = StandardScaler()
X_train_scaled = scaler.fit_transform(X_train)
X_test_scaled = scaler.transform(X_test)
QC Checkpoint 1: Check class balance, sample counts per group
from boruta import BorutaPy
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
from sklearn.feature_selection import SelectKBest, f_classif
# Pre-filter if >10k features
if X_train_scaled.shape[1] > 10000:
selector = SelectKBest(f_classif, k=5000)
selector.fit(X_train_scaled, y_train)
X_train_filt = X_train_scaled[:, selector.get_support()]
feature_mask = selector.get_support()
else:
X_train_filt = X_train_scaled
feature_mask = None
# max_depth=5: Shallow trees for stable importances
rf = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=100, max_depth=5, n_jobs=-1, random_state=42)
# max_iter=100: Usually sufficient; 200 if many tentative
boruta = BorutaPy(rf, n_estimators='auto', max_iter=100, random_state=42, verbose=0)
boruta.fit(X_train_filt, y_train)
selected_idx = boruta.support_
print(f'Selected {selected_idx.sum()} features')
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegressionCV
import numpy as np
# n_bootstrap=100: Quick; use 500 for publication
n_bootstrap = 100
stability_scores = np.zeros(X_train_scaled.shape[1])
for i in range(n_bootstrap):
idx = np.random.choice(len(y_train), size=len(y_train), replace=True)
# Cs=10: 10 regularization values to search
model = LogisticRegressionCV(penalty='l1', solver='saga', Cs=10, cv=3, random_state=i, max_iter=1000)
model.fit(X_train_scaled[idx], y_train[idx])
stability_scores += (model.coef_[0] != 0).astype(int)
stability_scores /= n_bootstrap
# stability_threshold=0.6: Standard; 0.8 for strict
selected_idx = stability_scores > 0.6
print(f'Selected {selected_idx.sum()} features (stability >0.6)')
QC Checkpoint 2:
from sklearn.model_selection import StratifiedKFold, cross_val_score
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
X_train_sel = X_train_scaled[:, selected_idx]
X_test_sel = X_test_scaled[:, selected_idx]
# outer_cv=5: Standard for performance estimation
outer_cv = StratifiedKFold(n_splits=5, shuffle=True, random_state=42)
# n_estimators=100: Sufficient for most omics
clf = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=100, random_state=42, n_jobs=-1)
cv_scores = cross_val_score(clf, X_train_sel, y_train, cv=outer_cv, scoring='roc_auc')
print(f'Nested CV AUC: {cv_scores.mean():.3f} +/- {cv_scores.std():.3f}')
QC Checkpoint 3:
import shap
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
clf.fit(X_train_sel, y_train)
# SHAP v0.47+: call explainer directly
explainer = shap.TreeExplainer(clf)
shap_values = explainer(X_train_sel)
# Beeswarm: shows importance AND direction
shap.plots.beeswarm(shap_values, max_display=20, show=False)
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig('shap_beeswarm.png', dpi=150, bbox_inches='tight')
plt.close()
# Extract top features
import numpy as np
mean_shap = np.abs(shap_values.values).mean(axis=0)
top_shap_idx = np.argsort(mean_shap)[-20:]
QC Checkpoint 4:
from sklearn.metrics import roc_auc_score, classification_report
import numpy as np
y_prob = clf.predict_proba(X_test_sel)[:, 1]
test_auc = roc_auc_score(y_test, y_prob)
print(f'Hold-out test AUC: {test_auc:.3f}')
# Bootstrap CI for AUC
# n_bootstrap=1000: Standard for publication-quality CI
n_bootstrap = 1000
boot_aucs = []
for i in range(n_bootstrap):
idx = np.random.choice(len(y_test), size=len(y_test), replace=True)
boot_aucs.append(roc_auc_score(y_test[idx], y_prob[idx]))
ci_lower, ci_upper = np.percentile(boot_aucs, [2.5, 97.5])
print(f'95% CI: [{ci_lower:.3f}, {ci_upper:.3f}]')
print(classification_report(y_test, clf.predict(X_test_sel)))
| Step | Parameter | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| Split | test_size | 0.2 (standard), 0.3 for small datasets |
| Boruta | max_iter | 100 (sufficient), 200 if tentative features |
| LASSO | n_bootstrap | 100 (quick), 500 for publication |
| LASSO | stability_threshold | 0.6 (standard), 0.8 for strict |
| Nested CV | outer_folds | 5 (standard), 10 for small datasets |
| Nested CV | inner_folds | 3 (sufficient for tuning) |
| RF | n_estimators | 100-500 |
| XGBoost | learning_rate | 0.1 (conservative) |
| Issue | Likely Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| No features selected | Too strict threshold | Lower stability threshold, increase iterations |
| Too many features (>200) | Noisy data | Add pre-filtering, increase regularization |
| Low CV AUC (<0.6) | No signal, low power | Check data quality, add samples |
| High variance across folds | Small sample size | Use more folds, LOOCV |
| SHAP features differ from selected | Model using different signal | Review feature correlations |
import pandas as pd
import joblib
# Save biomarker panel
feature_names = X_train.columns[selected_idx].tolist()
pd.DataFrame({'feature': feature_names}).to_csv('biomarker_panel.csv', index=False)
# Save model and scaler for deployment
joblib.dump(clf, 'biomarker_classifier.joblib')
joblib.dump(scaler, 'feature_scaler.joblib')
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Workflow for read alignment, sorting, indexing, mapping statistics, and downstream-ready alignment artifacts.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Validate protein designs using AlphaFold2 structure prediction. Use this skill when: (1) Validating designed sequences fold correctly, (2) Predicting binder-target complex structures, (3) Calculating confidence metrics (pLDDT, pTM, ipTM), (4) Self-consistency validation of designs, (5) Multi-chain complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. For faster single-chain prediction, use esm. For QC thresholds, use protein-qc.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
AlphaFold2 / AlphaFold-Multimer structure prediction for validation and confidence scoring. Use this skill when: (1) Validating designed sequences fold correctly, (2) Predicting binder-target complex structures, (3) Calculating confidence metrics (pLDDT, pTM, ipTM), (4) Self-consistency validation of designs, (5) Multi-chain complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. For faster single-chain prediction, use esm2-sequence-scoring. For QC thresholds, use protein-design-qc.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Workflow for event-level and isoform-level splicing analysis with sashimi-ready outputs and splice QC.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
ATAC-seq processing with assay QC, MACS3 peak calling, consensus peak matrices, differential accessibility, and motif or footprint follow-up.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
End-to-end binder design using BindCraft hallucination. Use this skill when: (1) Designing protein binders with built-in AF2 validation, (2) Running production-quality binder campaigns, (3) Using different design protocols (fast, default, slow), (4) Need joint backbone and sequence optimization, (5) Want high experimental success rate. For backbone-only generation, use rfdiffusion. For QC thresholds, use protein-qc. For tool selection guidance, use binder-design.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。