This skill should be used when the user asks to "check accessibility", "audit WCAG compliance", "scan HTML for a11y issues", "check color contrast", or "find accessibility violations in web pages".
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Productboard expert for workspace setup, Insight-to-Feature triage, Driver scoring, Releases, Roadmap views, and REST API automation. Use for Productboard administration, prioritization workflows, and programmatic API operations.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
实测评分 未实测
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Master-level expertise in Productboard workspace configuration, Insight inbox triage, Driver-based prioritization, Feature hierarchy management, Releases and Roadmap views, REST API operations, and two-way integration with Jira, Linear, Azure DevOps, Salesforce, Intercom, and Slack. Productboard sits between customer-feedback intake (Slack/Intercom/Salesforce/email) and the engineering tracker (Jira/Linear), with an opinionated three-layer model that differs meaningfully from generic issue trackers.
Productboard separates three layers: Insights (inbound customer evidence), Features (candidate product changes organized in Components and parent/child hierarchy), and Drivers + Releases (the prioritization framework — Drivers = weighted criteria, Releases = time-boxed delivery groupings). Insights link to Features (many-to-many); Features score against Drivers; high-scoring Features get added to Releases; Releases push down to Jira/Linear epics. The flow is inbox → triage → prioritize → ship.
The job of a Productboard expert is to operate fluently inside this model: configure the workspace cleanly, run the Insight inbox without backlog, design Driver weightings that match company strategy, and write API automations for what the UI does not cover.
Productboard advice depends most on the user's plan, the systems connected to the workspace, and whether the work reads data or changes it. Settle the inputs below before producing anything. When one is missing or vague and would change the result, ask about it; when it wouldn't, use a sensible default and say which one you used.
Ask about the two or three inputs that matter most for this request, not the whole list. If the user wants a result straight away, produce it and state your assumptions at the top.
Mistake: Sales reps type insights into the inbox as paraphrases, with no link to the call recording, email, Slack thread or interview. Why it happens: Paraphrasing is fast, and linking the source takes an extra step. Instead: Require a link to the recording, transcript or email on every Insight, and reject ones without it during triage. Unsourced insights can't be verified, and the same one often gets recorded several times by different people.
Mistake: An Insight from a free-tier user and one from an enterprise customer count equally toward a Feature's priority. Why it happens: Counting insights is the default, and segment weighting needs customer data synced in first. Instead: Weight scores by segment, for example by ARR from the Salesforce or HubSpot sync. Test it: if rankings flip when you re-score weighted by ARR, the current scoring is segment-blind.
Mistake: A public roadmap view shows "Bulk-edit: Q2 2026 (May)", and sales and customers read it as a promise. Why it happens: Releases carry dates internally, and the same view is easy to expose outside. Instead: Use Now / Next / Later for any customer-facing view or Portal, and keep calendar dates on internal views. Switch any external view that shows dates.
Seven more, each with a bad and a good example: references/red-flags.md.
Load the reference that matches the task — keep this file lean and pull detail on demand:
assets/productboard-feature-template.md (Feature structure), assets/productboard-insight-triage-workflow.md (daily triage SOP), assets/productboard-driver-template.md (Driver definitions). Official docs: https://developer.productboard.com/ · https://help.productboard.com/In Scope: Workspace and Component hierarchy setup, Insight inbox triage, Driver configuration and Feature scoring, Releases and Roadmap views (internal and customer-facing), Productboard REST API operations (Features, Insights, Releases, custom fields, webhooks), two-way integration setup with Jira/Linear/Azure DevOps, customer-data sync from Salesforce/HubSpot, bulk operations via API, Portal configuration.
Out of Scope: Engineering-side Jira/Linear configuration (see jira-expert/, linear-expert/). Strategic prioritization framework selection (see execution/prioritization-frameworks/). PRD authoring (see execution/create-prd/). Customer interview synthesis (see discovery/interview-synthesis/).
Limitations: API recipes target Public API v2 (/v2/...); v1 (X-Version: 1) was scheduled to sunset on 2026-07-08, and a few v1 capabilities (note followers, feedback forms, company field-definition management) have no v2 equivalent as of September 2026. API rate limits apply per access token (documented default 50 requests/second); aggressive scripts still compete with integrations sharing that token. The Salesforce/HubSpot integration is one-way (CRM → Productboard) on a schedule, not real time. Drivers max out at 10 per workspace on most plans. Roadmap views are good for time-bound delivery (Releases) but weaker for outcome-based roadmaps (Now/Next/Later) — augment with execution/outcome-roadmap/. Per-Component access control is an Enterprise feature.
| Integration | Direction | What flows |
|---|---|---|
jira-expert/ | Productboard ↔ Jira | Features push as Epics; status flows back; Sprint plan derived from prioritization |
linear-expert/ | Productboard ↔ Linear | Features push as Projects/Issues; Cycle assignment from Release dates |
execution/prioritization-frameworks/ | Bidirectional | Drivers operationalize RICE/ICE/WSJF; external scores import as custom fields |
execution/create-prd/ | Productboard → PRD | High-priority Features become PRDs; PRD link returns as custom field |
execution/outcome-roadmap/ | Bidirectional | Outcome themes map to Objectives; Releases give the delivery side |
execution/roadmap-communication/ | Productboard → Comms | Customer-facing Roadmap variants pull from Portal |
execution/customer-feedback-triage/ | Bidirectional | Triaged feedback clusters become Insights; inbox is the triage entry point |
execution/release-notes/ | Productboard → Release Notes | Completed Features in a Release become release-note line items |
senior-pm/ | Productboard → Portfolio | Driver scores and Feature distribution feed portfolio health |
notion-pm/ | Productboard ↔ Notion | Roadmap embeds into Notion; deep PRDs live in Notion linked from Features |
discovery/interview-synthesis/ | Bidirectional | Interview insights become Notes; high-evidence Features motivate interviews |
business-growth/customer-success/ | CS → Productboard | CS is a primary Insight source via Salesforce / Intercom integration |
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "check accessibility", "audit WCAG compliance", "scan HTML for a11y issues", "check color contrast", or "find accessibility violations in web pages".
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Design and run statistically rigorous A/B tests and experiments. Use when planning experiments, calculating sample sizes, designing test variants, selecting metrics, analyzing results, or when someone says "let's test that."
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Design and analyze A/B tests: sample size, test duration, and statistical significance for conversion experiments. Use when setting up an A/B test, calculating sample size, designing an experiment, or analyzing results.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Sales execution across pipeline, discovery, demos, negotiation, and closing. Use when qualifying opportunities, running MEDDIC discovery, building account plans, handling objections, structuring proposals, or forecasting pipeline.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Design ad creative across Google, Meta, LinkedIn, Twitter/X, and TikTok with platform format specs, headline formulas, and A/B testing. Use when writing ad copy, generating headline variations, creating ad sets, or validating creative.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Answer Engine Optimization (AEO): optimize content to be cited by LLMs (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini) in their answers. Use when designing content for LLM citation, auditing citability, or structuring Q&A schema.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。