跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

navigate

Pick the next work in an epic or bead graph; closed is not proven. Use when: asked what is next or whether an epic is done.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md9.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Navigate

Pick the next wave (the ready beads run together next) on a bead graph and keep the graph honest toward its frozen acceptance. The root epic holds acceptance; each child build bead is one experiment, built by native execution (the caller's coding agent and shell), or by one run of the optional RPI charter when the goal or caller selects it; a decision bead goes to the resolver it names (Foggy epics). Navigate never edits acceptance, dispatches, judges or closes: Craft Goal owns the prompt and HOLD (the goal's stop on a declared trigger, so the cause can be examined before more work runs), Plan shapes a bead, Orchestrate dispatches, native execution or RPI builds, Validate judges.

One pass, when a person asks what is next on an epic: steps 1 and 2 plus hygiene, returning the wave in the step 4 shape instead of handing it off. Write nothing; change edges only on the caller's go-ahead; stop after one pass. Each wave of a running goal: steps 1 to 4.

Rules that decide the pick

  • Closed is not proven. Only cited evidence for a criterion proves its row: the passing check that exercises it, or the Validate PASS where a fresh read was required. Closed status, a merge or an approving note leaves it open.
  • Serve an open row. Pick only ready beads that serve an open criterion or a named blocking uncertainty; a bead tied to none is a hygiene finding.
  • Stay disjoint. Picked write and generated scopes overlap neither each other nor any in-flight bead; an overlapping ready bead waits.
  • Ready is a tracker state. An empty ready list does not prove completion; a closed prerequisite with missing or stale bytes (the output it claims is absent or out of date) is not usable readiness.

Speak the domain

  • BDD: each criterion is a Given/When/Then example with an observable result. Each bead names the example it moves; a bead that lacks one gets Plan before it is built.
  • DDD: the root epic defines each domain term once, in one line. Titles, examples, code and tests reuse that exact word. A synonym is a hygiene finding; Domain settles disputes.
  • Write a bead as its title, then its id: Locale fallback test (ag-12).

Bead graph contract

Root epic: outcome, acceptance examples, non-goals, authority, domain terms. Child bead: the question and the criterion or uncertainty it serves; method, expected observation, falsifier, scope, non-goals; notes enough to resume after compaction; verdict, evidence refs, learning.

Edges: parent-child for membership, blocks only for real ordering, related for alternatives, discovered-from for provenance. A requested retrospective never blocks code judgment; both stay required.

The tracker owns status and closing. BD (Beads) is the example; any tracker with status, dependencies and notes fits. With BD, run bd context --json before any write; BR is a different tool, never a fallback or alias for BD. Beads Viewer (bv) rank is advice; live BD beats it and any saved plan.

1. Observe

bd context --json                   # verify the destination first
bd show <epic>                      # outcome, acceptance, domain terms
bd children <epic>                  # direct children only; recurse into child epics
bd ready --parent <epic> --json     # ready frontier across descendants
bd blocked --parent <epic>          # blocked work
bd show <bead>; bd comments <bead>  # prior verdicts and evidence refs

Build the acceptance matrix (criterion, evidence, status) under the rules above; note in-flight beads with their scopes and any result limit you hit. Done when every criterion has a row and every open row names its bead, blocker or gap.

2. Pick the wave

When every row is proven, or no ready bead serves an open row, pick nothing, say which, and go to step 4. Otherwise pick the smallest set of ready beads with the most decision-relevant information that meets the rules above and fits the declared wave budget; no budget means one bead. Prefer an early falsifier.

Hand each build bead to native execution, or to one RPI when the goal or caller selects it: through Orchestrate or Agent Native when delegation is authorized, one bead per worker, otherwise the caller's runtime. Its checks and CI are its result; it gets one fresh, author-distinct Validate only when the caller asks, a mistake cannot be cheaply undone after it lands, or no deterministic check covers the changed behavior, and a repair does not start another. A decision bead goes to the resolver it names, never to an implementer; one that needs the caller's answer goes under decisions in the checkpoint. Done when each picked bead has a one-line reason and a named handoff.

3. Ratchet the graph

Record each result unchanged on its bead: the check facts, and the verdict when one was obtained. For example bd update <id> --append-notes "verdict: FAIL; evidence: <refs>; learned: <decision it changes>". Update its matrix row, then classify each discovery:

DiscoveryAction
Needed for frozen acceptance, within authority and budgetbd create "<title>" --parent <epic> --deps discovered-from:<id> --acceptance "<example it serves>"
Useful laternote or link it outside the epic; never run it in this goal
Changes acceptance, exceeds authority or budgetHOLD; the goal's breaker (the HOLD triggers its prompt declares) takes over

A result ratchets when it proves part of acceptance, falsifies a live hypothesis with discriminating evidence, or resolves an uncertainty so the next experiment differs; FAIL and NOT_PROVEN can ratchet. Commits, counts, digests, rewritten plans and red with no new information are churn. Split old defects from regressions by before/after reproduction or equivalent causal evidence under the same acceptance; counts, timestamps and new ids prove no cause. Unknown cause, a reopened finding or recurrence of a closed finding class is HOLD, not proof the design is wrong. Keep necessary findings necessary; nothing resets a total. Done when every result sits on its bead and every discovery has a class.

4. Checkpoint

Append this block to the existing handoff or root epic notes; no new artifact. Stop after appending it: the goal continues, holds or ends. A one-pass reply uses the same block, writes nothing, and marks Ratchets, Budget and Helper n/a.

Acceptance: <id> <Given/When/Then>: proven (<check or PASS ref>)
            <id> <Given/When/Then>: open (<bead title> <id>, or the gap)
Frontier:   <ready beads, by title>
Wave:       <bead title>: <row or uncertainty it serves>; or none: <why>
Ratchets:   <results that changed a decision>; churn: <results that did not>
Hygiene:    <one finding per line>, or none
Budget:     <remaining if measured, else unmeasured>
Helper:     <HOLD incident and helper use, or none>; native state: <observed continue/stop>
Next:       <thesis>; decisions: <open questions for the caller>

Foggy epics

When the outcome is clear but the way there is not, the next beads are decisions, not build slices. Each open question becomes a decision bead whose answer is a choice, sized to one session, naming how it resolves: a cited fact (Research), a rough artifact the caller reacts to (Plan's probes and prototypes), a conversation with the caller (Interview), or a manual step that only unblocks a decision. Give it the tracker's decision type, never a build or agent-ready label (with BD, bd create --type decision), so a worker pulling build work skips it: bd ready --parent <epic> --exclude-type decision. A bead that needs the caller's own answer resolves only with the caller; never answer it on their behalf.

Track two lists with the root epic: in-scope questions not yet specific enough to become beads, which graduate as the frontier moves, and work ruled out of scope, which does not come back without the caller. Record each resolved decision as one line plus its bead, not a restatement. The fog has lifted when no decision stands between the graph and build beads with acceptance examples; hand those to Plan.

In a one-pass reply, return the proposed decision beads and both lists in the checkpoint block and write nothing. In a running goal, create beads and append notes through step 3, within authority and the declared wave budget; decision beads count against that budget like any other.

Hygiene

Report cycles among the epic's beads (bd dep cycles, filtered to them), beads tied to no criterion, blocks edges that are not real ordering, criteria with no observable result (an open decision the caller can settle with Interview; never rewrite one), closed beads with missing bytes, decision beads typed as build work, and drifted terms. bd graph <epic> shows the shape. Change edges only on the caller's go-ahead.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Dispatch independent tasks to parallel workers or subagents without write collisions. Use when: running or planning agents in parallel, even two; check scopes before any launch.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

boshu2/agentops4502026年10月23日 更新

Run a supplied task in headless AGY (Antigravity, Gemini) and collect its result. Use when: AGY, Antigravity or Gemini is requested by name; never a fallback.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

boshu2/agentops4502026年10月23日 更新

Compare interface designs and find structural friction. Use when: a change spreads across modules or a boundary is unclear. For code changes, use Refactor.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

boshu2/agentops4502026年10月23日 更新

Run one prompt through headless Claude with scoped permissions and a time bound. Use when: scripting or automating a `claude -p` call, even a simple one.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

boshu2/agentops4502026年10月23日 更新

Run one prompt through headless Codex and capture the result. Use when: wanting a one-shot `codex exec` run or CI step. Not for batches or retries.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

boshu2/agentops4502026年10月23日 更新

council

免费

Compare independent opinions from several models or contexts without inflating agreement. Use when: wanting a second opinion or debate, or summarizing several reviewers' results.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

boshu2/agentops4502026年10月23日 更新

查看 boshu2 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题