Dispatch independent tasks to parallel workers or subagents without write collisions. Use when: running or planning agents in parallel, even two; check scopes before any launch.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Create, repair, audit or consolidate agent skills (SKILL.md packages). Use when: writing or fixing a skill, its description or structure. Not for one-off lessons; use Memory.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Create, repair, audit or export one canonical skill package, or turn supported expertise into a small authoring proposal.
Apply these before any creation step, including when the request already names the new skill or file it wants:
| Need | Entry point |
|---|---|
| Create a source package | scripts/build.sh with from-scratch, from-template or absorb-external |
| Check package structure | scripts/heal.sh --check [--strict] skills/<slug> |
| Repair owned projections | scripts/heal.sh --fix skills/<slug> |
| Inspect audit evidence | `scripts/audit.sh [--profile canonical |
| Export to another platform | Conversion |
| Make repeated expertise reusable | Distill expertise |
Run only the selected operation. Skills remain optional tools within the native caller's authorized outcome; this skill does not add execution phases, own work, operate Git, validate a software candidate, or decide delivery and retries. Inputs, report destinations, exit codes and recovery from partial creation are in build and check mechanics.
Treat external skills as structural signals only. Clean-room output must not
copy their names, prose, prompts, scripts or examples. from-template reuses
metadata defaults; absorb-external <slug> --from <path> verifies an input and
creates a blank source package. Neither imports another skill's content.
scripts/build.sh creates one incomplete source package containing only
SKILL.md with metadata.authoring_state: scaffold; helpers, references and
assets are conditional on the actual behavior. Replace the placeholders and
state applicability, inputs, authority, result, completion and failure in the
layout that makes them clear. Remove the scaffold state only after authoring
the behavior; strict source checks reject it. Removing it is an author
assertion, not proof of semantic completeness.
Edit skills/<slug>/ as the source owner. Check the completed source with
scripts/heal.sh --check --strict skills/<slug>, then regenerate its owned
projections through the repository's owning commands. Inspect the generated
diff; hand-edit no projection.
Creation is staged, not atomic. If a later stage fails, keep the created source and any report, capture the exit and diagnostic, and report source creation separately from projection and check completion. Never call a partial result a completed package or delete it to rerun creation. Missing required scripts, references or runtime support block only their dependent operation; name that resource and continue work that does not depend on it.
Check mode is read-only; fix mode regenerates owned projections for explicit
targets and invents no source behavior. The default audit reports static
conformance, located effects, behavioral evidence and non-gating authoring
suspicions separately, with no total, rating or aggregate verdict. Effects and
behavior stay NOT_PROVEN because the audit runs no skill or trial. Exact checks,
exit codes and the opt-in legacy schema live in audit checks,
authoring doctrine and
Codex parity.
Use bash skills/skill-builder/scripts/converter/convert.sh <skill-dir> <target> [output-dir] for an explicit out-of-tree export. Targets are codex, cursor
and test; --all selects all source packages, and --codex-layout inline
selects the legacy inline Codex layout. Read
SkillBundle when format details
matter. Parse the source once, render the target, then validate resource parity
and target format. Report layout and any omitted Cursor references.
The default export is .agents/projections/converter/<target>/<skill-name>/.
The exporter clean-writes its output directory, so use only the explicit derived
target: refuse a source package, its ancestor, or the repository root. Preserve
the source unchanged and fix the source or adapter instead of editing output.
A parse, write, format or required-resource failure leaves an incomplete export.
Every runtime, Codex included, loads skills/ directly; this ad-hoc exporter
never produces a shipped tree.
When the caller wants a reusable rule, apply the decision rules above, then begin with cited occurrences or a named authoritative source. State the trigger, desired behavior, inputs, outputs, negative example and limits. Preserve short source excerpts or command results with resolvable citations. Use Research's pattern mode when the claim needs exemplars and a holdout before packaging. Show a negative or holdout case and how the proposed rule returns the right decision. Minimal recovery state needs a named evidence-loss or corruption risk.
Respect Memory's source and destination rules for mined material. Evidence cannot publish itself as policy. A proposal-only request ends with the proposal. Repair ordinary known defects within existing authority; tool failures remain explicit facts for the native caller, not an automatic helper chain.
For an actual package edit, use the source template for required fields and context density guidance when deciding which prose earns a place. Neither requires adding a new skill.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Dispatch independent tasks to parallel workers or subagents without write collisions. Use when: running or planning agents in parallel, even two; check scopes before any launch.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Run a supplied task in headless AGY (Antigravity, Gemini) and collect its result. Use when: AGY, Antigravity or Gemini is requested by name; never a fallback.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Run one prompt through headless Claude with scoped permissions and a time bound. Use when: scripting or automating a `claude -p` call, even a simple one.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Run one prompt through headless Codex and capture the result. Use when: wanting a one-shot `codex exec` run or CI step. Not for batches or retries.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Compare independent opinions from several models or contexts without inflating agreement. Use when: wanting a second opinion or debate, or summarizing several reviewers' results.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Draft or lint a bounded long-running goal prompt with a finish line and hard limits. Use when: selected by name; one change goes to Plan.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。