跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

progressive-estimation

Estimate AI-assisted and hybrid human+agent development work with research-backed PERT statistics and calibration feedback loops

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

集成工具Jira
查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md3.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Progressive Estimation

Estimate AI-assisted and hybrid human+agent development work using research-backed formulas with PERT statistics, confidence bands, and calibration feedback loops.

Overview

Progressive Estimation adapts to your team's working mode — human-only, hybrid, or agent-first — applying the right velocity model and multipliers for each. It produces statistical estimates rather than gut feelings.

When to Use This Skill

  • Estimating development tasks where AI agents handle part of the work
  • Sprint planning with hybrid human+agent teams
  • Batch sizing a backlog (handles 5 or 500 issues)
  • Staffing and capacity planning with agent multipliers
  • Release date forecasting with confidence intervals

How It Works

  1. Mode Detection — Determines if the team works human-only, hybrid, or agent-first
  2. Task Classification — Categorizes by size (XS–XL), complexity, and risk
  3. Formula Application — Applies research-backed multipliers grounded in empirical studies
  4. PERT Calculation — Produces expected values using three-point estimation
  5. Confidence Bands — Generates P50, P75, P90 intervals
  6. Output Formatting — Formats for Linear, JIRA, ClickUp, GitHub Issues, Monday, or GitLab
  7. Calibration — Feeds back actuals to improve future estimates

Examples

Single task:

"Estimate building a REST API with authentication using Claude Code"

Batch mode:

"Estimate these 12 JIRA tickets for our next sprint"

With context:

"We have 3 developers using AI agents for ~60% of implementation. Estimate this feature."

Best Practices

  • Start with a single task to calibrate before moving to batch mode
  • Feed back actual completion times to improve the calibration system
  • Use "instant mode" for quick T-shirt sizing without full PERT analysis
  • Be explicit about team composition and agent usage percentage

Common Pitfalls

  • Problem: Overconfident estimates Solution: Use P75 or P90 for commitments, not P50

  • Problem: Missing context Solution: The skill asks clarifying questions — provide team size and agent usage

  • Problem: Stale calibration Solution: Re-calibrate when team composition or tooling changes significantly

Related Skills

  • @sprint-planning - Sprint planning and backlog management
  • @project-management - General project management workflows
  • @capacity-planning - Team velocity and capacity planning

Additional Resources

Limitations

  • Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
  • Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
  • Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 10 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

bouclem/skills72026年5月31日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

bouclem/skills72026年5月31日 更新

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

bouclem/skills72026年5月31日 更新

Create, iterate, and scale paid ad creative for Google Ads, Meta, LinkedIn, TikTok, and similar platforms. Use when generating headlines, descriptions, primary text, or large sets of ad variations for testing and performance optimization.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

bouclem/skills72026年5月31日 更新

This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

bouclem/skills72026年5月31日 更新

AI agent development workflow for building autonomous agents, multi-agent systems, and agent orchestration with CrewAI, LangGraph, and custom agents.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

bouclem/skills72026年5月31日 更新

查看 bouclem 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题