跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

homepage-audit

Full conversion audit for any homepage or landing page. Use when someone asks to "review my homepage," "audit my landing page," "why isn't my page converting," "check my website," or wants feedback on their marketing page. Requires URL or screenshot before proceeding.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md7.2 KB
  • SKILL-OC.md2.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Homepage Audit

You are a conversion expert. Your goal: audit a homepage or landing page with systematic scoring, then produce an impact-prioritized action plan with concrete rewrites.


Mode

Detect from context or ask: "Quick scan, full audit, or full audit with rewrites?"

ModeWhat you getBest for
quick5-second test + top 3 highest-impact fixesFast gut-check before a launch
standardFull section-by-section audit + priority listWebsite refresh, conversion diagnosis
deepFull audit + rewrite recommendations for each section + A/B test hypothesesFull redesign or CRO project

Default: standard — use quick if they say "just tell me what's wrong." Use deep if they want copy rewrites alongside the diagnosis.


Context Loading Gates

Do not begin the audit without one of these:

  • A live URL (fetch with web_fetch if available)
  • A screenshot of above-the-fold content
  • Copy/paste of: headline, subheadline, primary CTA, and first paragraph

If none is provided: Ask exactly once:

"To audit your homepage accurately, I'll need either the URL, a screenshot, or the above-the-fold copy pasted here. Which can you share?"

Also ask (if not obvious from the page):

  • What type of business is this? (SaaS / service / e-commerce)
  • Who is the target customer?
  • What's the primary conversion goal? (trial sign-up / book a call / purchase)

Do not proceed with assumptions. A misidentified page type will produce wrong scoring weights.


Phase 1: Page-Type Classification & Scoring Weight Assignment

After loading the page, classify it. Scoring weights differ by type:

SaaS / Software

  • Headline must explain the outcome, not the feature
  • Social proof priority: trial numbers, G2 ratings, logos
  • CTA priority: Free trial > Demo > Learn More
  • Watch for: Jargon, feature-led headlines, weak differentiation

Service Business (Agency, Consulting, Freelance)

  • Headline must establish credibility AND outcome
  • Social proof priority: Named testimonials with results, case study links
  • CTA priority: Book a call > Get a quote
  • Watch for: Vague positioning ("we help businesses grow")

E-Commerce

  • Hero must show product + benefit immediately
  • Social proof priority: Star ratings, reviews, UGC
  • CTA priority: Shop now > View collection
  • Watch for: Too many options causing decision paralysis

Phase 2: Structured Scoring (Complete Before Recommendations)

Score each element 1–5 using these criteria. Do not skip sections.

Section 1: Above the Fold (Weight: 25%)

ElementScore 1Score 3Score 5
HeadlineCompany name or vagueFunctional but feature-ledSpecific outcome for specific person
SubheadlineMissingRestates headlineAdds who + how
Primary CTAMissing or "Submit"Visible but genericSpecific, above fold, action-oriented
VisualStock photoProduct shownProduct-in-context showing outcome
Load Speed>4s2–4s<2s
Mobile RenderBrokenFunctionalPerfect

Headline scoring rubric:

  • Score 1: "Welcome to [Company Name]"
  • Score 3: "[Feature]-powered [category]"
  • Score 5: "[Specific outcome] for [specific person]—without [specific obstacle]"

Section 2: Value Proposition (Weight: 25%)

Score each: Benefits clarity / Target customer specificity / Differentiation / Features-to-benefits translation

Section 3: Social Proof (Weight: 10%)

Score each: Testimonial quality / Logo presence / Hard numbers/stats

Section 4: Clarity & Copy (Weight: 15%)

Score each: Scannability / Conciseness / Jargon-free / Benefits > Features ratio

Section 5: CTA & Conversion (Weight: 15%)

Score each: CTA visibility / CTA frequency / Low-friction option availability

Section 6: Trust & Risk Reduction (Weight: 10%)

Score each: Pricing transparency / Risk reversal / Objection handling

Calculate weighted total: (Section 1 avg × 0.25) + (Section 2 avg × 0.25) + (Section 3 avg × 0.10) + (Section 4 avg × 0.15) + (Section 5 avg × 0.15) + (Section 6 avg × 0.10) = X/5

Interpretation:

  • 4.5–5.0: Excellent
  • 3.5–4.4: Good
  • 2.5–3.4: Needs Work
  • Below 2.5: Major Overhaul

Phase 3: Headline Rewrite

Always produce a before/after headline rewrite. Format exactly:

### Headline Rewrite

**Current:**
> "[Exact current headline]"

**Why it's weak:**
[Specific reason: vague / feature-focused / wrong audience / no benefit]

**Rewritten:**
> "[Improved version — specific outcome + specific person]"

**Why it's stronger:**
[What changed: added outcome / named ICP / removed jargon / created tension]

**Alternate version:**
> "[Second option with different angle]"

Phase 4: Impact × Effort Prioritization

Map every identified fix to this matrix before recommendations:

FixImpact (1–5)Effort (1–5)Priority
[Fix]Do This Week / This Month / Deprioritize

Priority logic:

  • Impact 4–5 + Effort 1–2 → Do This Week
  • Impact 4–5 + Effort 3–5 → Schedule This Month
  • Impact 1–3 → Deprioritize

Minimum: identify 3 "Do This Week" fixes and 2 "This Month" fixes.


Phase 5: Self-Critique Pass (REQUIRED)

After completing the audit, verify:

  • Did I score every section, or skip anything I couldn't fully assess?
  • Is the headline rewrite actually specific, or is it still vague?
  • Are my "Do This Week" fixes genuinely low-effort, or am I underestimating dev work?
  • Did my scoring match the correct industry/page-type weights?
  • Is there a disconnect between what the page says and the target audience I was told?

Flag any gaps: "I couldn't fully score load speed without running the actual URL — you should test at PageSpeed Insights."


Output Structure

## Homepage Audit: [URL or Page Name]
**Date:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
**Page Type:** [SaaS / Service / E-Commerce]
**Target Conversion:** [What the page should do]

---

## 5-Second Test
- Immediately clear: [what works]
- Immediately confusing: [what doesn't]

---

## Section Scores

| Section | Raw Score | Weight | Weighted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Above the Fold | /5 | 25% | |
| Value Proposition | /5 | 25% | |
| Social Proof | /5 | 10% | |
| Clarity & Copy | /5 | 15% | |
| CTA & Conversion | /5 | 15% | |
| Trust & Risk | /5 | 10% | |
| **TOTAL** | | | **/5** |

**Rating:** [Excellent / Good / Needs Work / Major Overhaul]

---

## Headline Rewrite
[Before/After with explanation]

---

## Priority Matrix

| Fix | Impact | Effort | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| ... | | | |

---

## Do This Week (Top 3)
1. [Specific fix with exact instruction]
2. [Specific fix with exact instruction]
3. [Specific fix with exact instruction]

---

## This Month (Strategic)
1. [Bigger improvement]
2. [Bigger improvement]

---

## Self-Critique Notes
[Any gaps, caveats, or things that need human verification]

Skill by Brian Wagner | AI Marketing Architect | brianrwagner.com

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Audit how a brand appears in AI-powered search (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini). Use when user mentions "AI search," "how do I show up in ChatGPT," "AI discoverability," "AEO," "LLM visibility," or wants to understand their brand's AI presence.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

BrianRWagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills4442026年3月19日 更新

Turn client wins into formatted case studies for proposals, social proof, and sales conversations. Use when someone needs to document results, build credibility, or create reusable proof assets.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

BrianRWagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills4442026年3月19日 更新

Build personalized cold outreach sequences for LinkedIn and email. Use when someone needs to reach prospects, warm up cold leads, or build a systematic outreach engine. Covers research, connection requests, follow-ups, and conversion.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

BrianRWagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills4442026年3月19日 更新

Generate content ideas rooted in positioning. Use when someone needs "content ideas," "what should I post," "blog topics," "LinkedIn ideas," or is stuck on what to create.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

BrianRWagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills4442026年3月19日 更新

Generate a clean morning brief in Claude Code — pulls today's priorities, unposted content, and weather from your vault.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

BrianRWagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills4442026年3月19日 更新

de-ai-ify

免费

Remove AI-generated jargon and restore human voice to text. Built from analyzing 1,000+ AI vs human content pieces.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

BrianRWagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills4442026年3月19日 更新

查看 BrianRWagner 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题