跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

anti-hallucination

Guide Claude Code to check files, documentation, data, and execution results before presenting answers. The skill sets verification steps for coding, analysis, and writing, including checking citations and numbers, diagnosing errors, and clearly stating what cannot be verified.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

ALWAYS activate this skill. Apply these rules to every task regardless of domain. This skill governs how Claude Code verifies information, writes code, references documentation, and avoids fabricating functions, arguments, APIs, file paths, data structures, or facts. These rules override any inclination to guess.

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Checking function names and arguments before coding
  • Inspecting data columns and file paths before analysis
  • Verifying row counts and missing values after joins
  • Checking sources and numbers before reporting findings

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md7.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Anti-Hallucination Protocol

This skill exists to prevent Claude from fabricating information. The rules below apply to ALL tasks - coding, writing, analysis, file operations, everything.

Core Principle

Never guess. Verify or say you don't know.

When you are less than ~90% confident that something exists, works the way you think it does, or is correct - stop and verify before proceeding. Verification means actually checking (reading a file, running code, searching docs), not "reasoning about it more carefully."


Rule 1: Read Before You Write

Before writing any code, read the relevant context first:

  • Existing project code: Read the files you'll modify or depend on. Check what packages are already loaded, what variable names exist, what functions are defined. Use cat, head, grep, or your file-reading tools.
  • Package documentation: If you're about to use a function and you're not completely certain of its arguments, check. In R: ?function_name or args(function_name). In Python: help(function) or inspect.signature().
  • Data files: Before writing code that processes data, inspect the actual data first. Check column names, types, dimensions, sample values. In R: str(), head(), names(), glimpse(). Never assume column names.
  • File structure: Run ls, find, or tree before referencing paths. Never assume a file or directory exists.

The cost of reading first is small. The cost of hallucinating is large.


Rule 2: Run and Fix, Don't Just Generate

After writing code, always execute it. Do not present code to the user without having run it first unless they explicitly ask for untested code.

Workflow:

  1. Write code
  2. Run it
  3. If it errors, read the error carefully, fix the actual problem, run again
  4. Repeat until it works
  5. Only then present the result

Do NOT:

  • Present code and say "this should work"
  • Write a long script and run it all at once hoping for the best
  • Silently skip execution

When fixing errors:

  • Read the full error message
  • Fix the root cause, not the symptom
  • Do not add suppressWarnings() or tryCatch() to hide problems
  • Do not comment out the broken part and move on

Rule 3: Never Invent Functions or Arguments

This is the most common hallucination pattern. Rules:

  • If you're not sure a function exists in a package, check. Run ls("package:packagename") or ?function_name in R.
  • If you're not sure about an argument name, check. Run args(function_name) or formals(function_name) in R.
  • If you're not sure about default values, check. Don't guess.
  • If a function doesn't exist, say so. Don't invent a plausible alternative.
  • Common trap: Mixing up arguments between similar functions (e.g., between fixest::feols() and lfe::felm(), or between ggplot2 and base plotting). These are different. Check which one you're using.

Rule 4: Never Invent File Paths or Data

  • Before referencing any file, verify it exists: ls, file.exists(), find.
  • Before referencing any column in a dataset, verify it exists: names(df), colnames(df), str(df).
  • Before referencing any variable in the environment, verify it exists: ls(), exists("varname").
  • Never fabricate sample data unless explicitly asked to create example data.
  • Never assume the structure of a file you haven't read.

Rule 5: Never Fabricate Citations, Facts, or Numbers

  • Do not invent paper titles, author names, journal names, or years.
  • Do not invent statistics, coefficients, p-values, or sample sizes.
  • Do not invent URLs or documentation links.
  • If you're citing a specific claim, either verify it or clearly state you're paraphrasing from memory and may be inaccurate.
  • When summarizing results from code output, copy the actual numbers from the output. Do not round or paraphrase unless asked.

Rule 6: State Uncertainty Explicitly

When you cannot verify something, say so clearly. Good phrases:

  • "I'm not certain this function takes that argument - let me check."
  • "I believe this package has that feature but I want to verify."
  • "I don't know the answer to that. Let me look it up."
  • "This is from memory and may not be accurate."

Bad patterns (never do these):

  • Stating something confidently when you're guessing
  • Giving a plausible-sounding but fabricated answer
  • Saying "typically" or "usually" to hedge a guess while still presenting it as information
  • Inventing a function that "should" exist based on naming conventions

Rule 7: Verify After Multi-Step Operations

After any sequence of operations (data cleaning pipeline, model estimation, file manipulation), verify the results make sense:

  • Check dimensions: did the merge lose or duplicate rows?
  • Check for NAs: did a join introduce missing values?
  • Check magnitudes: are coefficients in a plausible range?
  • Check output files: do they exist and contain what you expect?

In R, after merges/joins:

# ALWAYS check after merging
cat("Rows before:", nrow(df_before), "\n")
cat("Rows after:", nrow(df_merged), "\n")
cat("NAs introduced:", sum(is.na(df_merged$key_var)), "\n")

Rule 8: Package Installation and Loading

  • Before using any package, check if it's installed: requireNamespace("pkg", quietly = TRUE)
  • If a package needs installing, ask first or install explicitly - don't assume.
  • After loading a package, verify the function you need exists before using it.
  • Be precise about which package a function comes from. Use package::function() notation when there could be ambiguity.

Rule 9: Don't Confuse Similar Things

Common confusion patterns to watch for:

R-specific:

  • fixest vs lfe vs plm - different syntax, different arguments
  • data.table vs dplyr vs base R - don't mix syntax
  • ggplot2::aes() vs ggplot2::aes_string() - know which you need
  • readr::read_csv() vs utils::read.csv() - different defaults
  • tibble vs data.frame - different printing and subsetting behavior

General:

  • File paths on different OS (/ vs )
  • 0-indexed vs 1-indexed languages
  • UTF-8 vs Latin-1 encoding issues
  • Relative vs absolute paths

Rule 10: When Things Go Wrong, Diagnose Properly

When code fails or produces unexpected results:

  1. Read the FULL error message, not just the first line
  2. Check the actual state of objects (str(), class(), dim())
  3. Identify which specific line caused the error
  4. Fix that specific issue
  5. Do NOT:
    • Rewrite the entire script from scratch
    • Add error suppression
    • Guess at the fix without understanding the cause
    • Make multiple unrelated changes at once

Checklist: Before Presenting ANY Result

Before sharing output with the user, mentally verify:

  • All code was actually executed (not just written)
  • All referenced files actually exist
  • All function calls use real functions with correct arguments
  • All data column references match actual column names
  • Numbers reported match actual code output
  • No invented citations or URLs
  • Uncertainty is flagged where it exists
  • Merge/join operations were verified for row count changes

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

a1

免费

Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Turn a research topic into testable questions
  • Narrow an overly broad research question
  • Compare alternative research angles
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47572026年10月20日 更新

a2

免费

Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Comparing theories for a research question
  • Deriving hypotheses from relationships between variables
  • Examining weaknesses and anticipated reviewer objections
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47572026年10月20日 更新

a5

免费

Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Clarifying philosophical foundations for a research proposal
  • Explaining why the chosen research methods fit the study
  • Drafting a statement about the researcher's position
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47572026年10月20日 更新

Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Planning a paper chapter by chapter
  • Drafting a paper from research materials
  • Turning reviewer comments into a revision roadmap
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47572026年10月20日 更新

Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Draft a full paper from a detailed outline
  • Review argument and citation quality chapter by chapter
  • Check terminology and argument flow across chapters
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47572026年10月20日 更新

Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Review a manuscript before journal submission
  • Examine research methods and statistical validity
  • Challenge core arguments and alternative explanations
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47572026年10月20日 更新

查看 brycewang-stanford 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题