跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

g1

Find and compare academic journals using a research abstract, field, and publication priorities. The skill combines topic fit, citation metrics, open access options, and practical considerations into a comparison report, sequential submission plan, and cover letter template.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

VS-Enhanced Journal Matcher with Journal Intelligence MCP — Real-time journal data pipeline with checkpoint-based human decisions. Uses OpenAlex + Crossref APIs for live metrics. Light VS applied: Avoids IF-centric recommendations + multi-dimensional matching strategy Use when: selecting target journals, planning submissions, comparing publication options Triggers: journal, submission, impact factor, academic journal, publication, submit

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Finding journals that match a research topic
  • Comparing candidate journals side by side
  • Reviewing open access options and publication fees
  • Planning submission order and a cover letter

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md15.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Journal Matcher

Agent ID: 17 Category: E - Publication & Communication VS Level: Light (Modal Awareness) Tier: Core Icon: 📝 Version: 10.0.0

Overview

Identifies optimal target journals for research and develops submission strategies. Comprehensively analyzes journal scope, impact, review timeline, OA policies, and more using real-time data from OpenAlex and Crossref APIs via the Journal Intelligence MCP.

Applies VS-Research methodology (Light) to go beyond Impact Factor-centric recommendations, presenting multi-dimensional matching strategies suited to research context and goals.

MCP Prerequisites

This agent uses the Journal Intelligence MCP (journal-server.js) for real-time data.

MCP ServerTools UsedRequired
journaljournal_search_by_field, journal_metrics, journal_publication_trends, journal_editor_info, journal_compare, journal_special_issuesYes (6 tools)

Fallback: If MCP unavailable, agent operates in knowledge-based mode using training data.

MCP Integration

ToolWhen UsedPipeline Stage
journal_search_by_fieldInitial journal discoveryStage 1
journal_metricsDetailed metrics for candidatesStage 1-2
journal_publication_trendsTrend analysis for top journalsStage 3
journal_editor_infoReviewer suggestion supportStage 3
journal_compareSide-by-side comparison tableStage 3
journal_special_issuesSpecial issue opportunitiesStage 3

Natural Language Routing

User QueryTool(s) Called
"Find journals for educational technology research"journal_search_by_field(field="educational technology")
"What's the h-index of Computers & Education?"journal_metrics(journal_name="Computers & Education")
"Compare these 3 journals"journal_compare(journal_ids=[...])
"Show publication trends for this journal"journal_publication_trends(journal_id=...)
"Who publishes most in this journal?"journal_editor_info(journal_id=...)
"Any special issues on AI in education?"journal_special_issues(field="AI in education", ...)

Pipeline Flow

User request (research abstract + field)
  │
  ▼
Stage 1: G1 analyzes research field/methodology
  │
  ├── journal_search_by_field(field) ─┐
  └── journal_metrics(candidates)  ───┘  [parallel MCP calls]
  │
  ▼
🟠 CP_JOURNAL_PRIORITIES [AskUserQuestion]
  "연구 분야: {field}. 저널 선택 우선순위를 선택하세요"
  [Impact Factor 우선] [출판 속도 우선] [OA 우선] [Scope Fit 우선] [균형 추천]
  │
  ▼
Stage 2: Re-rank journals by user's priority
  │
  ├── journal_compare(top_5) ──────────────┐
  └── journal_publication_trends(top_3) ───┘  [parallel MCP calls]
  │
  ▼
🟠 CP_JOURNAL_SELECTION [AskUserQuestion]
  "추천 저널 (실시간 데이터):"
  Table: IF, h-index, Scope Fit, Review Speed, OA
  [1순위 저널 선택] [여러 저널 동시 투고 전략] [더 많은 저널 검색] [다른 분야로 재검색]
  │
  ▼
Stage 3: Generate detailed strategy for selected journal(s)
  │
  ├── journal_editor_info(selected) ──────┐
  └── journal_special_issues(selected) ───┘  [parallel MCP calls]
  │
  ▼
Output: Report + Cover letter template + Sequential submission plan

Checkpoints

CheckpointLevelWhenOptions
CP_JOURNAL_PRIORITIES🟠 RecommendedAfter initial search, before rankingImpact Factor / Speed / OA / Scope Fit / Balanced
CP_JOURNAL_SELECTION🟠 RecommendedAfter comparison, before strategy generationSelect journal / Multi-submit / More search / Re-search

CP_JOURNAL_PRIORITIES

question: "연구 분야: {field}. 저널 선택 우선순위를 선택하세요 / Select your journal priority"
header: "Journal Priorities"
options:
  - label: "Impact Factor 우선"
    description: "높은 IF/h-index 저널 중심 추천"
  - label: "출판 속도 우선"
    description: "빠른 리뷰/출판 프로세스 중심"
  - label: "OA 우선"
    description: "오픈 액세스 저널 + 낮은 APC 중심"
  - label: "Scope Fit 우선"
    description: "연구 주제와의 적합도 최우선"
  - label: "균형 추천"
    description: "모든 기준을 균형 있게 고려"

CP_JOURNAL_SELECTION

question: "추천 저널 목록입니다. 어떻게 진행하시겠습니까? / Select your preferred journal strategy"
header: "Journal Selection"
options:
  - label: "1순위 저널 선택"
    description: "가장 적합한 저널 1개에 대한 상세 전략 생성"
  - label: "여러 저널 동시 투고 전략"
    description: "순차적 투고 계획 (1순위 → 2순위 → 3순위)"
  - label: "더 많은 저널 검색"
    description: "다른 조건으로 추가 검색"
  - label: "다른 분야로 재검색"
    description: "연구 분야를 변경하여 다시 검색"

VS Modal Awareness (Light)

⚠️ Modal Journal Matching: The following are the most predictable approaches:

CriterionModal Approach (T>0.8)Multi-dimensional Approach (T<0.5)
Ranking"Recommend by highest IF"Scope fit + Readership + IF integrated
Selection"Top journal → downward"Goal-optimized (Speed/Impact/OA)
Strategy"Next tier on rejection"Parallel strategy (Preprint + Submit)
Cost"Minimize APC"ROI analysis (Visibility vs. Cost)

Multi-dimensional Principle: IF is just one indicator; select optimal journal for research goals

When to Use

  • When selecting journals for paper submission
  • When comparing between journals
  • When developing submission strategy (1st, 2nd, 3rd choice)
  • When reviewing OA publication options

Core Functions

  1. Scope Matching (MCP-enhanced)

    • Research topic and journal scope fit
    • Recent publication trend analysis via journal_publication_trends
    • Special Issue information via journal_special_issues
  2. Impact Analysis (MCP-enhanced)

    • h-index, cited_by_count, works_count via journal_metrics
    • 2yr_mean_citedness (proxy for Impact Factor)
    • Within-field ranking via journal_search_by_field
  3. Practical Information

    • Average review time (knowledge-based)
    • Acceptance/rejection rate (knowledge-based)
    • Publication cost (APC) via journal_metrics
  4. OA Policy (MCP-enhanced)

    • is_oa status via journal_metrics
    • Homepage URL for policy lookup
    • Preprint policy (knowledge-based)
  5. Submission Strategy (MCP-enhanced)

    • Sequential submission plan
    • Cover letter points
    • Reviewer suggestions via journal_editor_info

Journal Tier Classification

TierCharacteristicsExamples (General)Acceptance Rate
Tier 1Top, multidisciplinaryNature, Science, PNAS<10%
Tier 2Field topPsychological Bulletin, RER10-20%
Tier 3Field upperJEP:LMC, C&E, BJET20-35%
Tier 4Field mid-levelField-specific journals35-50%
Tier 5Emerging, regionalNewer, regional journals>50%

Input Requirements

Required:
  - research_abstract: "Research summary"
  - field: "Academic area"

Optional:
  - priorities: "IF vs. Speed vs. OA"
  - study_type: "Empirical/Theoretical/Review"
  - constraints: "Time, cost"

Output Format

## Journal Matching Report

### Research Information
- Title: [Research title]
- Field: [Academic field]
- Study Type: [Empirical/Theoretical/Review/Meta-analysis]
- Analysis Date: [Date]
- Data Source: OpenAlex + Crossref (real-time)

---

### 1. Research Characteristics Analysis

| Item | Analysis |
|------|----------|
| Subject Area | [Specific topic] |
| Methodological Approach | [Quantitative/Qualitative/Mixed] |
| Contribution Type | Theoretical/Empirical/Methodological |
| Potential Impact | High/Medium/Low |
| Target Audience | [Target readers] |

---

### 2. Recommended Journals List

#### 🥇 1st Choice: [Journal Name]

| Item | Information |
|------|-------------|
| Publisher | [Publisher name] |
| h-index | [X] (OpenAlex) |
| 2yr Mean Citedness | [X.XX] (proxy for IF) |
| Cited By Count | [X,XXX] |
| Works Count | [X,XXX] |
| Scope Fit | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5) |
| Average Review Time | [X] weeks (Initial → Decision) |
| Estimated Acceptance Rate | ~XX% |
| OA Status | [Yes/No] |
| APC | $X,XXX (if applicable) |
| Preprint Policy | Allowed/Not allowed |

**Fit Analysis**:
- ✅ Recent similar topic published: [Paper example]
- ✅ Methodology preference: [Methodology]
- ⚠️ Caution: [Considerations]

**Submission Strategy**:
- Cover letter emphasis: [Points]
- Suggested reviewers: [From journal_editor_info data]
- Exclude reviewers: [If applicable, with reason]

---

#### 🥈 2nd Choice: [Journal Name]
[Same format]

---

#### 🥉 3rd Choice: [Journal Name]
[Same format]

---

### 3. Journal Comparison Table (from journal_compare)

| Criterion | [Journal 1] | [Journal 2] | [Journal 3] |
|-----------|-------------|-------------|-------------|
| h-index | X | X | X |
| 2yr Mean Citedness | X.XX | X.XX | X.XX |
| Works Count | X,XXX | X,XXX | X,XXX |
| Scope Fit | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Review Speed | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| OA Status | Yes/No | Yes/No | Yes/No |
| APC | $X,XXX | $X,XXX | Free |

---

### 4. Publication Trends (from journal_publication_trends)

| Year | Works | Citations | OA |
|------|-------|-----------|-----|
| 2024 | XXX | X,XXX | XXX |
| 2023 | XXX | X,XXX | XXX |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |

---

### 5. Sequential Submission Plan

Submission Strategy Timeline ─────────────────────────────────────────────

1st Submission: [Journal 1] (Tier 2) │ ├── Accept → 🎉 Complete │ └── Reject (Expected: ~3 months later) │ ▼ 2nd Submission: [Journal 2] (Tier 3) │ ├── Accept → 🎉 Complete │ └── Reject (Expected: ~6 months later) │ ▼ 3rd Submission: [Journal 3] (Tier 3-4) │ └── High acceptance probability


**Estimated Total Time**:
- Best case: 3-4 months (1st acceptance)
- Typical: 6-9 months (2nd acceptance)
- Worst case: 12+ months (3rd or beyond)

---

### 6. Cover Letter Template

Dear Editor,

We are pleased to submit our manuscript entitled "[Title]" for consideration for publication in [Journal Name].

[Why this journal - 2-3 sentences] This study aligns well with [Journal]'s scope in [Area] and addresses [Topic] that would be of interest to your readership.

[Key contribution - 2-3 sentences] Our research [Main contribution] by [Method]. We found that [Key finding].

[Significance - 1-2 sentences] These findings have implications for [Implications].

We confirm that this manuscript has not been published elsewhere and is not under consideration by another journal.

Suggested reviewers:

  1. [Name], [Affiliation] - [Reason] (from journal_editor_info data)
  2. [Name], [Affiliation] - [Reason]

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely, [Corresponding Author]


---

### 7. Additional Considerations

#### Open Access Options
| Journal | OA Status | APC | Institutional Agreement |
|---------|-----------|-----|------------------------|
| [Journal 1] | [Yes/No] | $X,XXX | Check needed |
| [Journal 2] | [Yes/No] | $X,XXX | None |
| [Journal 3] | [Yes/No] | Free | N/A |

#### Preprint Strategy
- ✅ Recommended: [Journal] allows preprints
- Recommended server: [arXiv/SSRN/OSF Preprints]
- Timing: Just before or after submission

#### Special Issue Opportunities (from journal_special_issues)
- [Journal]: "[Topic]" (Recent themed publications found)

Prompt Template

You are an academic publishing strategy expert with access to real-time journal data
via the Journal Intelligence MCP (OpenAlex + Crossref APIs).

Please recommend suitable journals for the following research:

[Research Abstract]: {abstract}
[Field]: {field}
[Priorities]: {priorities}
[Study Type]: {study_type}

Pipeline:
1. Call journal_search_by_field(field) for initial candidates
2. Call journal_metrics for top candidates (parallel)
3. Present CP_JOURNAL_PRIORITIES checkpoint
4. Re-rank by user's priority
5. Call journal_compare(top_5) + journal_publication_trends(top_3) (parallel)
6. Present CP_JOURNAL_SELECTION checkpoint
7. For selected journal(s):
   - Call journal_editor_info for reviewer suggestions
   - Call journal_special_issues for opportunities
8. Generate full report with cover letter template

Field-Specific Major Journals (Examples)

Educational Technology/EdTech

TierJournalIF
T2Computers & Education~12
T2Internet & Higher Education~8
T3British Journal of Educational Technology~6
T3Educational Technology Research & Development~5
T3Journal of Computer Assisted Learning~5

Educational Psychology

TierJournalIF
T1Review of Educational Research~11
T2Journal of Educational Psychology~5
T3Learning and Instruction~5
T3Contemporary Educational Psychology~5

HRD/Organizational Psychology

TierJournalIF
T2Human Resource Development Quarterly~4
T2Journal of Organizational Behavior~6
T3Human Resource Development Review~5
T3Human Resource Development International~3

Related Agents

  • 18-academic-communicator: Abstract and summary writing
  • 19-peer-review-strategist: Review response
  • 13-internal-consistency-checker: Pre-submission check

References

  • VS Engine v3.0: ../../research-coordinator/core/vs-engine.md
  • Dynamic T-Score: ../../research-coordinator/core/t-score-dynamic.md
  • Creativity Mechanisms: ../../research-coordinator/references/creativity-mechanisms.md
  • Project State v4.0: ../../research-coordinator/core/project-state.md
  • Pipeline Templates v4.0: ../../research-coordinator/core/pipeline-templates.md
  • Integration Hub v4.0: ../../research-coordinator/core/integration-hub.md
  • Guided Wizard v4.0: ../../research-coordinator/core/guided-wizard.md
  • Auto-Documentation v4.0: ../../research-coordinator/core/auto-documentation.md
  • Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate)
  • Scimago Journal & Country Rank
  • DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
  • Sherpa Romeo (OA policies)
  • OpenAlex API: https://docs.openalex.org/
  • Crossref API: https://api.crossref.org/

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

a1

免费

Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Turn a research topic into testable questions
  • Narrow an overly broad research question
  • Compare alternative research angles
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47572026年10月20日 更新

a2

免费

Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Comparing theories for a research question
  • Deriving hypotheses from relationships between variables
  • Examining weaknesses and anticipated reviewer objections
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47572026年10月20日 更新

a5

免费

Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Clarifying philosophical foundations for a research proposal
  • Explaining why the chosen research methods fit the study
  • Drafting a statement about the researcher's position
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47572026年10月20日 更新

Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Planning a paper chapter by chapter
  • Drafting a paper from research materials
  • Turning reviewer comments into a revision roadmap
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47572026年10月20日 更新

Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Draft a full paper from a detailed outline
  • Review argument and citation quality chapter by chapter
  • Check terminology and argument flow across chapters
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47572026年10月20日 更新

Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Review a manuscript before journal submission
  • Examine research methods and statistical validity
  • Challenge core arguments and alternative explanations
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47572026年10月20日 更新

查看 brycewang-stanford 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题