跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

help

Find your way around Diverga with a guide to its 24 research agents across nine categories. View commands, example requests, direct invocation syntax, and checkpoints where people review research decisions, with recommendations based on research context.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Diverga help guide - displays all 24 agents across 9 categories, commands, and usage examples. Triggers: help, guide, how to use, 도움말

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Explore Diverga's research agents
  • Find commands for setup and diagnostics
  • Choose an agent for a research task
  • Check where human review is required

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md15.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

/diverga:help

Version: 2.0.0 Trigger: /diverga:help

Description

Displays comprehensive guide for Diverga, including all 24 agents across 9 categories, commands, and usage examples.

Output

When user invokes /diverga:help, display:

╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║                     Diverga v11.0 Help                           ║
║         AI Research Assistant - 24 Agents, 9 Categories          ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                        QUICK START                               │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Just describe your research:                                     │
│   "I want to conduct a meta-analysis on AI in education"        │
│   "Help me design a qualitative study"                          │
│   "메타분석 연구를 시작하고 싶어"                                  │
│                                                                  │
│ Diverga auto-detects context and activates relevant agents.      │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                         COMMANDS                                 │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ /diverga:setup          Initial configuration wizard            │
│ /diverga:doctor         System diagnostics & health check       │
│ /diverga:help           This help guide                         │
│ /diverga:meta-analysis  Meta-analysis workflow (C5)             │
│ /diverga:humanize       Humanization pipeline (G5+G6+F5)       │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│              CATEGORY A: FOUNDATION (3 agents)                   │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ diverga:a1  ResearchQuestionRefiner     Refine research Qs      │
│ diverga:a2  TheoreticalFrameworkArchitect  Frameworks + Critique │
│             + Visualization (absorbed A3, A6)                    │
│ diverga:a5  ParadigmWorldviewAdvisor    Ontology + Ethics       │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│              CATEGORY B: EVIDENCE (2 agents)                     │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ diverga:b1  LiteratureReviewStrategist  Literature search       │
│ diverga:b2  EvidenceQualityAppraiser    RoB, GRADE appraisal    │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│         CATEGORY C: DESIGN & META-ANALYSIS (4 agents)            │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ diverga:c1  QuantitativeDesignConsultant  Quant design          │
│             + Materials + Sampling (absorbed C4, D1)             │
│ diverga:c2  QualitativeDesignConsultant   Qual design           │
│             + Ethnography + Action Research (absorbed H1, H2)    │
│ diverga:c3  MixedMethodsDesignConsultant  Mixed methods         │
│ diverga:c5  MetaAnalysisMaster ⭐         Meta-analysis lead    │
│             + Data/Effect/Error/Sensitivity (absorbed C6,C7,B3,E5)│
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│            CATEGORY D: DATA COLLECTION (2 agents)                │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ diverga:d2  DataCollectionSpecialist    Interview + Observation  │
│             (absorbed D3, renamed)                               │
│ diverga:d4  MeasurementInstrumentDeveloper  Instrument dev      │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│              CATEGORY E: ANALYSIS (3 agents)                     │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ diverga:e1  QuantitativeAnalysisGuide   Statistical guidance    │
│             + Code Gen + Sensitivity (absorbed E4, E5)           │
│ diverga:e2  QualitativeCodingSpecialist  Qualitative coding     │
│ diverga:e3  MixedMethodsIntegration     Integration methods     │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│               CATEGORY F: QUALITY (1 agent)                      │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ diverga:f5  HumanizationVerifier        Verify humanization     │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│            CATEGORY G: COMMUNICATION (4 agents)                  │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ diverga:g1  JournalMatcher              Match journals          │
│ diverga:g2  PublicationSpecialist       Writing + Review + PreReg│
│             + Quality (absorbed G3, G4, F1, F2, F3)             │
│ diverga:g5  AcademicStyleAuditor        AI pattern detection    │
│ diverga:g6  AcademicStyleHumanizer      Humanize AI text        │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│              CATEGORY I: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (4 agents)            │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ diverga:i0  ReviewPipelineOrchestrator  Pipeline coordination   │
│ diverga:i1  PaperRetrievalAgent         Multi-database fetch    │
│ diverga:i2  ScreeningAssistant          AI-PRISMA screening     │
│ diverga:i3  RAGBuilder                  Vector DB + Parallel    │
│             (absorbed B5)                                        │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│              CATEGORY X: CROSS-CUTTING (1 agent)                 │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ diverga:x1  ResearchGuardian            Ethics + Bias detection │
│             (absorbed A4, F4)                                    │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    HUMAN CHECKPOINTS                             │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 🔴 REQUIRED (System STOPS):                                      │
│    CP_PARADIGM       Research paradigm selection                 │
│    CP_METHODOLOGY    Methodology approval                        │
│                                                                  │
│ 🟠 RECOMMENDED (System PAUSES):                                  │
│    CP_THEORY         Theory framework selection                  │
│    CP_DATA_VALIDATION Data extraction validation                │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                   MODEL ROUTING                                  │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ HIGH (Opus):   A1,A2,A5,C1,C2,C3,C5,D4,E1,E2,E3,G6,I0         │
│ MEDIUM (Sonnet): B1,B2,D2,G1,G2,G5,X1,I1,I2                     │
│ LOW (Haiku):   F5,I3                                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                 AUTO-TRIGGER KEYWORDS                            │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ "research question", "RQ", "연구 질문"        → diverga:a1      │
│ "theoretical framework", "이론적 프레임워크"  → diverga:a2      │
│ "critique", "devil's advocate", "반론"       → diverga:a2      │
│ "IRB", "ethics", "연구 윤리"                 → diverga:x1      │
│ "meta-analysis", "메타분석", "효과크기"       → diverga:c5      │
│ "systematic review", "PRISMA"               → diverga:b1      │
│ "qualitative", "interview", "질적 연구"      → diverga:c2      │
│ "ethnography", "action research"            → diverga:c2      │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

For more info: https://github.com/HosungYou/Diverga

Direct Agent Invocation

Users can invoke specific agents:

diverga:c5   # Invoke Meta-Analysis Master directly
diverga:a1   # Invoke Research Question Refiner

Implementation Notes

  • Help content adapts to user's language preference
  • Agent recommendations based on detected research context
  • Links to GitHub for full documentation

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

a1

免费

Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Turn a research topic into testable questions
  • Narrow an overly broad research question
  • Compare alternative research angles
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47422026年10月20日 更新

a2

免费

Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Comparing theories for a research question
  • Deriving hypotheses from relationships between variables
  • Examining weaknesses and anticipated reviewer objections
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47422026年10月20日 更新

a5

免费

Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Clarifying philosophical foundations for a research proposal
  • Explaining why the chosen research methods fit the study
  • Drafting a statement about the researcher's position
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47422026年10月20日 更新

Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Planning a paper chapter by chapter
  • Drafting a paper from research materials
  • Turning reviewer comments into a revision roadmap
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47422026年10月20日 更新

Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Draft a full paper from a detailed outline
  • Review argument and citation quality chapter by chapter
  • Check terminology and argument flow across chapters
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47422026年10月20日 更新

Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Review a manuscript before journal submission
  • Examine research methods and statistical validity
  • Challenge core arguments and alternative explanations
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47422026年10月20日 更新

查看 brycewang-stanford 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题