跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

lifelines

Analyze time until events such as recovery or relapse using Python. Account for censored observations, where the event has not been observed, create survival curves, compare groups, and estimate risk factors with Cox regression.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Complete survival analysis library in Python. Handles right-censored data, Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox regression. Standard for clinical trial analysis and epidemiology.

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Analyzing time to death or disease progression in clinical trials
  • Comparing survival curves across treatment groups
  • Estimating risk factors with Cox regression
  • Studying time to infection or recovery

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md3.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Lifelines - Survival Analysis

In medicine, we often care about "Time to Event" (death, recovery, relapse). Lifelines handles the complexity of "censored" data (patients who left the study).

When to Use

  • Analyzing clinical trial data (time to death, disease progression).
  • Comparing survival between treatment groups.
  • Identifying risk factors using Cox Proportional Hazards regression.
  • Building survival models for prognosis.
  • Epidemiology studies (time to infection, recovery).

Core Principles

Censoring

Patients who haven't experienced the event by the end of the study are "censored". Lifelines properly accounts for this.

Hazard Ratios

In Cox regression, a hazard ratio > 1 means increased risk; < 1 means decreased risk.

Survival Curves

Kaplan-Meier estimates the probability of survival over time without assuming a distribution.

Quick Reference

Standard Imports

from lifelines import KaplanMeierFitter, CoxPHFitter
from lifelines.statistics import logrank_test
import pandas as pd

Basic Patterns

# 1. Kaplan-Meier (Visualizing survival)
kmf = KaplanMeierFitter()
kmf.fit(durations=df['days'], event_observed=df['died'])
kmf.plot_survival_function()
kmf.median_survival_time_  # Time when 50% have died

# 2. Cox Proportional Hazards (Risk factors)
cph = CoxPHFitter()
cph.fit(df, duration_col='days', event_col='died')
cph.print_summary() # See hazard ratios for age, drug type, etc.
cph.plot_partial_effects_on_outcome(covariates=['age'], values=[30, 50, 70])

Critical Rules

✅ DO

  • Use event_observed correctly - 1 = event occurred, 0 = censored.
  • Check proportional hazards assumption - Use cph.check_assumptions() to validate Cox model.
  • Compare groups with logrank test - Statistical test for survival curve differences.
  • Plot confidence intervals - Survival estimates have uncertainty, especially with small samples.

❌ DON'T

  • Don't ignore censoring - Treating censored patients as "survived" biases results.
  • Don't use regular regression - Time-to-event data requires specialized methods.
  • Don't assume proportional hazards - If violated, use stratified Cox or parametric models.

Advanced Patterns

Comparing Multiple Groups

from lifelines.statistics import multivariate_logrank_test

# Compare survival across treatment groups
results = multivariate_logrank_test(df['days'], df['group'], df['died'])
print(results.p_value)

Parametric Models

from lifelines import WeibullFitter, ExponentialFitter

# When you need to extrapolate beyond observed data
wf = WeibullFitter()
wf.fit(df['days'], df['died'])
wf.plot()

Lifelines transforms complex survival data into actionable medical insights, enabling evidence-based decisions in clinical research and practice.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

a1

免费

Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Turn a research topic into testable questions
  • Narrow an overly broad research question
  • Compare alternative research angles
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47482026年10月20日 更新

a2

免费

Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Comparing theories for a research question
  • Deriving hypotheses from relationships between variables
  • Examining weaknesses and anticipated reviewer objections
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47482026年10月20日 更新

a5

免费

Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Clarifying philosophical foundations for a research proposal
  • Explaining why the chosen research methods fit the study
  • Drafting a statement about the researcher's position
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47482026年10月20日 更新

Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Planning a paper chapter by chapter
  • Drafting a paper from research materials
  • Turning reviewer comments into a revision roadmap
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47482026年10月20日 更新

Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Draft a full paper from a detailed outline
  • Review argument and citation quality chapter by chapter
  • Check terminology and argument flow across chapters
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47482026年10月20日 更新

Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Review a manuscript before journal submission
  • Examine research methods and statistical validity
  • Challenge core arguments and alternative explanations
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47482026年10月20日 更新

查看 brycewang-stanford 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题