跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

obsidian-experiment-log

Organize experiment goals, settings, metrics, and progress in existing Obsidian notes. Keep temporary logs in daily notes, promote stable findings into result notes, and connect evidence with interpretation and decisions about the next step.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Use this skill when the user discusses experiment design, ablations, training runs, evaluation, baselines, metrics, failures, or result interpretation that should be logged into Obsidian experiment and result notes.

集成工具Obsidian

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Record experiment plans and training progress
  • Organize baseline and ablation comparisons
  • Preserve stable findings with supporting evidence
  • Connect paper-based hypotheses to results and writing

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md2.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Obsidian Experiment Log

Use this skill whenever project work changes the experimental state.

Role in the workflow

This is a supporting skill under obsidian-project-memory.

It should help maintain canonical experiment and result notes, not create note sprawl.

Default outputs

  • the relevant canonical note in Experiments/
  • the relevant canonical note in Results/, if a durable finding exists
  • links from today's Daily/ note
  • relevant hub or plan references only when project state materially changes

Main rules

  • Prefer updating an existing experiment note over creating a sibling note for the same experiment line.
  • Prefer updating an existing result note over creating a parallel result page for the same durable finding.
  • Raw logs, metric dumps, and temporary analysis fragments should usually stay in Daily/ until they are interpreted.
  • A result note should exist only when the outcome is stable enough to reference later.

Minimum experiment sections

  • Goal / hypothesis
  • Code or config entrypoint
  • Dataset / split
  • Metrics
  • Status (planned, running, done, failed)
  • Findings / notes
  • Next step

Minimum result sections

  • Linked experiment
  • Main observation
  • Key numbers
  • Evidence
  • Interpretation
  • Decision: keep / iterate / discard

Linking rule

Link experiments and results directly to each other, and link both back to 00-Hub.md, 01-Plan.md, or Daily/ only when those references improve the main working surface.

Research path handoff

Treat experiment notes as the bridge between Papers/ and Results/:

  • paper-derived hypotheses, baselines, and ablations should land here,
  • stable findings should be promoted from here into Results/,
  • when a result becomes claim-worthy, update Writing/ rather than leaving the chain unfinished.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

a1

免费

Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Turn a research topic into testable questions
  • Narrow an overly broad research question
  • Compare alternative research angles
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47542026年10月20日 更新

a2

免费

Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Comparing theories for a research question
  • Deriving hypotheses from relationships between variables
  • Examining weaknesses and anticipated reviewer objections
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47542026年10月20日 更新

a5

免费

Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Clarifying philosophical foundations for a research proposal
  • Explaining why the chosen research methods fit the study
  • Drafting a statement about the researcher's position
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47542026年10月20日 更新

Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Planning a paper chapter by chapter
  • Drafting a paper from research materials
  • Turning reviewer comments into a revision roadmap
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47542026年10月20日 更新

Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Draft a full paper from a detailed outline
  • Review argument and citation quality chapter by chapter
  • Check terminology and argument flow across chapters
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47542026年10月20日 更新

Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Review a manuscript before journal submission
  • Examine research methods and statistical validity
  • Challenge core arguments and alternative explanations
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47542026年10月20日 更新

查看 brycewang-stanford 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题