Use this skill when the user keeps paper notes inside an Obsidian project knowledge base and wants filesystem-first literature review, explicit agent-first Zotero ingestion, `Papers/` plus `Knowledge/` synthesis, collection-wide normalization, and a default literature canvas without Obsidian MCP.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Handle the literature sub-workflow inside the filesystem-first Obsidian project knowledge base.
This is a supporting skill under obsidian-project-memory.
Use it when the user says things like:
Papers/”.claude/project-memory/registry.yaml, or can be imported with obsidian-project-bootstrapPapers/ inside Research/{project-slug}/$zotero-obsidian-bridge when the source corpus is in Zotero$zotero-obsidian-bridge to pull them into canonical Papers/*.md notes.Papers/ and adjacent synthesis notes using filesystem tools.$obsidian-markdown.
ClaimMethodEvidenceLimitationDirect relevance to repoRelation to other papersKnowledge/ notes,Writing/ if the user asked for a review or comparison deliverable.Knowledge/, not Experiments/ or Results/:
Knowledge/Literature-Overview.mdKnowledge/Method-Families.mdKnowledge/Research-Gaps.md
when the synthesis is stable enough to deserve canonical notes.Maps/literature.canvas after major paper-note changes or batch note creation.
Maps/literature-main.canvas only when a lightweight presentation graph is needed.Papers/ remains first-class: one durable paper note per paper whenever possibleKnowledge/ holds durable literature synthesis notesMaps/literature.canvas is the default visual graph surfaceDo not assume by default:
Concepts/Datasets/.base viewsThe literature workflow may create Maps/literature.canvas by default. Other artifacts still require explicit justification.
Load only what is needed:
references/PAPER-NOTE-SCHEMA.md - detailed paper-note frontmatter and sectionsreferences/CANVAS-WORKFLOW.md - how and when to refresh Maps/literature.canvas还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问，或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
VS-Enhanced Research Question Refiner - Prevents Mode Collapse and derives differentiated research questions Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Modal question avoidance, alternatives presentation, differentiated RQ recommendation Use when: refining research ideas, formulating research questions, clarifying scope Triggers: research question, 연구 질문, PICO, SPIDER, research idea
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
VS-Enhanced Theoretical Framework Architect with Critique & Visualization Full VS 5-Phase process: Modal theory avoidance, Long-tail exploration, differentiated framework presentation Absorbed A3 (Devil's Advocate) critique and A6 (Conceptual Framework Visualizer) capabilities Use when: building theoretical foundations, designing conceptual models, deriving hypotheses, critiquing frameworks, visualizing models Triggers: theoretical framework, 이론적 프레임워크, conceptual model, 개념적 모형, hypothesis derivation, critique, devil's advocate, 반론, visualization, diagram
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Agent A5 - Paradigm & Worldview Advisor - Philosophical foundations for research design. Covers ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology alignment. Use when: establishing philosophical foundations, justifying methodological choices, writing positionality statements Triggers: paradigm, 패러다임, ontology, epistemology, worldview, 세계관, philosophical foundations, 철학적 기초
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Academic paper writing skill with 12-agent pipeline. v2.5: Style Calibration (learn author's writing voice from past papers) + Writing Quality Check (writing quality checklist for natural prose). Supports IMRaD, literature review, theoretical, case study, policy brief, and conference paper structures. APA 7.0 (default), Chicago, MLA, IEEE, Vancouver citation formats. Bilingual abstracts (zh-TW + EN). Multi-format output (LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Triggers on: write paper, academic paper, paper outline, write abstract, revise paper, check citations, convert to LaTeX, guide my paper, parse reviews, revision roadmap, 寫論文, 學術論文, 論文大綱, 寫摘要, 修改論文, 檢查引用, 引導我寫論文, 帶我規劃論文, 逐章規劃, 論文架構, 審查意見, 修訂路線圖.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。