Revise a LaTeX academic manuscript using internal review comments, annotations, or tracked changes. Compare original passages with proposed revisions, approve each change individually, and receive a summary of applied and skipped items.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Revise an academic paper based on internal review comments. Reads review report or annotated manuscript, then applies revisions one by one with user approval. Trigger when user says "self revise" / "paper-selfrevise" / "内部修改" / "根据审稿意见修改".
实测评分 未实测
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
This skill revises an academic paper (main.tex) based on internal review comments. The user provides a project folder containing the manuscript and review materials. The skill extracts review comments, then processes them one by one: displaying the comment, showing the original text, proposing a revision, and asking for user approval before applying the change.
Input: A project folder containing:
main.tex — the main manuscript (the file to be modified)review.txt, review.md, review.pdf, report.txt, report.md, report.pdf)annotated.tex, annotated.pdf) where annotations/comments serve as review commentsOutput: The revised main.tex with all approved changes applied in place.
$ARGUMENTS or ask).main.tex and all supporting materials (tables, figures) in the project folder to fully understand the paper.
b. Draft a review report in English (~3000 words), structured as:
review.pdf in the project folder using a Bash command to generate the PDF (e.g., via pandoc or a Python script with reportlab/fpdf). If pandoc is available, first write the content to review.md then convert: pandoc review.md -o review.pdf. If pandoc is not available, use Python to generate the PDF.
d. Count the words of the generated review report (count words in the source text — the review.md content or the raw English text used to build review.pdf, excluding markdown/PDF formatting markup). Use a Bash command such as wc -w review.md or a Python word-count snippet on the text.
e. Inform the user, displaying the actual word count: "审稿报告已生成并保存为 review.pdf（共 X 词），现在开始逐条修改。" — substitute X with the measured count.
f. Proceed to Phase 1 using the newly created review.pdf as the review material.main.tex (the target file to revise).review*, report*, referee*, comments*, annotated*, feedback*, revision*.main.tex in full to understand the current manuscript (skip if already read in Phase 0)..tex files: look for comments marked with % or annotation commands (e.g., \annotate{}, \comment{}, \todo{}, or any custom annotation commands)..txt / .md files: read the full content as review comments..pdf files: read the PDF content to extract review text..docx files: use Bash to extract text content.\added{}, \deleted{}, \replaced{}{}, \st{}, \sout{}, \hl{}, or similar commands from packages like changes, trackchanges, latexdiff).%-comments, \todo{}, \comment{}, etc.I have extracted the following review comments:
No. | Type | Location | Comment Summary
----|----------|---------------------------|------------------------------------------
1 | 批注 | Section 3, para 2 | Clarify the identification strategy
2 | 修订痕迹 | Section 4.1, Table 2 | Replace "effect" with "impact" in sentence about...
3 | 批注 | Section 5, para 1 | Strengthen the mechanism discussion
...
Total: N comments. Shall I proceed with revisions one by one?
For each review comment, follow this exact interaction pattern:
For annotation comments (批注):
───────────────────────────────────────────
批注 [X/N]:
[Full text of the reviewer's comment]
───────────────────────────────────────────
For tracked changes (修订痕迹):
───────────────────────────────────────────
修订痕迹 [X/N]:
[Description: e.g., "删除了 'XXX'，替换为 'YYY'" or "插入了 'XXX'" or "删除了 'XXX'"]
───────────────────────────────────────────
Locate and display the relevant passage from main.tex:
Original text:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ [The exact paragraph(s) from main.tex │
│ that this comment refers to] │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
If the comment refers to missing content (e.g., "add a discussion of X"), show the surrounding context where the new text should be inserted.
For annotation comments: Generate a revised version of the text that addresses the reviewer's comment.
For tracked changes: The proposed revision is the result of accepting the tracked change (i.e., applying the deletion/insertion/replacement as marked by the reviewer).
Proposed revision:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ [The revised paragraph(s) that address │
│ the reviewer's comment] │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
Rationale: [Brief explanation of what was changed and why]
Use AskUserQuestion to ask:
Do you approve this revision? (yes / no / skip / edit)
- yes: Apply this revision to main.tex
- no: I will propose a new revision
- skip: Skip this comment and move to the next
- edit: You provide the revised text yourself
main.tex. Confirm the change was applied, then move to the next comment.After processing all comments:
Revision complete!
Applied: X / N items (A annotation comments + B tracked changes)
Skipped: Y items
Auto-filtered (formatting-only): Z items
Total changes made to main.tex: X
Modified sections:
- Section 3: 2 revisions
- Section 4: 1 revision
- Section 5: 3 revisions
main.tex to check for consistency or flow issues introduced by the revisions.\section{}, \subsection{}, \ref{}, \cite{}, \citep{}, math environments, etc.\label{}), cross-references (\ref{}), and citations intact unless the review specifically asks to change them.\cite{} / 70% \citep{}).---): Do not use the LaTeX em-dash --- in revised or newly written prose. It is a common AI-writing tell and clutters academic text. Replace each occurrence with the punctuation its grammatical role calls for: a parenthetical aside becomes parentheses (or commas if short); a connector before an explanation becomes a colon or semicolon; an abrupt shift becomes a period and two sentences; a list continuation becomes a comma plus a connecting word. Leave the en-dash -- used for page and number ranges untouched (e.g., pages={259--271}, 2012--2026). When a revision touches a paragraph, also strip any pre-existing --- from that paragraph as part of the edit..tex file from the project folder before proposing the revision, to ensure accuracy.ref.bib or similar bibliography files, modify those files as well.\vspace, \hspace, \newpage, \clearpage, figure/table positioning options like [htbp], etc.) must be automatically skipped without presenting to the user. Only substantive content comments are shown.还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问，或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。