跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

research-setup

Configure the social-science-research plugin through guided questions about your field, institution, journals, and datasets. Save research preferences, researcher details, and R figure colors in project files for use in your research context.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Interactive setup wizard that configures a new project for the social-science-research plugin. Asks the user questions about their field, institution, journals, datasets, key researchers, and R color palette, then writes the answers into references/domain-profile.md and CLAUDE.md. Make sure to use this skill first whenever a user is starting fresh or wants to configure the plugin. Triggers include: "set up my project", "configure the plugin", "run setup", "initialize this project", "I just installed the plugin", "set my field", "set my institution", "configure my domain profile", or any request to personalize the plugin for a specific research context.

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Set up a newly installed research plugin
  • Register journals and datasets for a research field
  • Save key researchers for literature searches
  • Update institution details and R figure colors

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md4.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Research Setup Wizard

Walk the user through setup using AskUserQuestion menus wherever possible. Collect all answers, then write config files in one pass.


Step 0: Check Existing Config

Read CLAUDE.md and references/domain-profile.md silently. If either has real content (not placeholders), tell the user what's already configured and offer to confirm or update each section.


Step 1: Field & Identity

AskUserQuestion — 2 questions at once:

  1. Field (single select, header: "Field"): "What is your field or subfield?" — Options: "Political Science", "Economics", "Sociology", "Public Health". User selects Other for unlisted fields.

  2. Institution (single select, header: "Institution"): "What is your institution?" — Options: "Duke University", "Harvard University", "Stanford University", "UC Berkeley". User selects Other for unlisted fields.

Store field and institution for customizing later steps.


Step 2: Name & Project Title

Ask conversationally (not via AskUserQuestion):

  1. "What is your name (for paper authorship)? You can skip this for now."
  2. "Do you have a working title for your current project? Fine to skip if you're still exploring."

Wait for the user's response before moving to Step 3.


Step 3: Journals

AskUserQuestion — 2 multi-select questions based on the user's field:

  1. Top journals (multiSelect, header: "Top journals"): "Select your top journals (pick all that apply):" — Offer the 4 most prestigious journals for the user's selected field. Use your knowledge of the field's top venues.

  2. Secondary journals (multiSelect, header: "Secondary"): "Select secondary or subfield journals:" — Offer 4 secondary/subfield journals appropriate to the user's field.

User can multi-select presets and add custom journals via Other.


Step 4: Datasets

AskUserQuestion — 2 multi-select questions based on the user's field:

  1. Common datasets (multiSelect, header: "Datasets"): "Which datasets do you commonly use?" — Offer the 4 most-used datasets for the user's field. Use your knowledge of field-standard data sources.

  2. Additional sources (multiSelect, header: "More data"): "Any additional data sources?" — Offer 4 cross-disciplinary sources: World Bank Open Data, IPUMS, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Census Bureau.


Step 5: Researchers & Colors

AskUserQuestion — 2 questions at once:

  1. Researchers (single select, header: "Researchers"): "Add key researchers for targeted literature searches?" — Options: "Skip for now" / "Add researchers".

  2. Colors (single select, header: "Colors"): "Which color palette should R figures use?" — If the institution is well-known, offer its official brand colors as the recommended option with a preview showing the hex codes. Otherwise offer: "Custom colors" / "Skip for now".

If the user chose "Add researchers", ask conversationally for names, institutions, and Google Scholar URLs. Do NOT guess researcher names.

If the user chose "Custom colors", ask conversationally for primary and secondary hex codes.


Step 6: Write Config Files

references/domain-profile.md

Read the existing file and update each section with the user's answers. Preserve the file's existing structure and comments. Only replace sections the user answered; leave unanswered sections unchanged. Add an "Institutional Colors" section at the end if one doesn't exist, with the user's hex codes (or defaults #012169 / #f2a900 if skipped).

IMPORTANT: Do NOT write to rules/r-code-conventions.md. Colors live in references/domain-profile.md only.

CLAUDE.md

Update the project header placeholders:

  • [YOUR PROJECT NAME] → user's project title (or leave placeholder if skipped)
  • [YOUR NAME] → user's name (or leave placeholder if skipped)
  • [YOUR INSTITUTION] → user's institution

Step 7: Confirm

Setup complete:
- references/domain-profile.md — field, [N] journals, [N] datasets[, N researchers][, colors]
- CLAUDE.md — project name and institution

Update anytime: references/domain-profile.md
Next step: /new-project

Note any skipped sections and where to add them later.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

a1

免费

Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Turn a research topic into testable questions
  • Narrow an overly broad research question
  • Compare alternative research angles
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47442026年10月20日 更新

a2

免费

Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Comparing theories for a research question
  • Deriving hypotheses from relationships between variables
  • Examining weaknesses and anticipated reviewer objections
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47442026年10月20日 更新

a5

免费

Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Clarifying philosophical foundations for a research proposal
  • Explaining why the chosen research methods fit the study
  • Drafting a statement about the researcher's position
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47442026年10月20日 更新

Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Planning a paper chapter by chapter
  • Drafting a paper from research materials
  • Turning reviewer comments into a revision roadmap
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47442026年10月20日 更新

Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Draft a full paper from a detailed outline
  • Review argument and citation quality chapter by chapter
  • Check terminology and argument flow across chapters
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47442026年10月20日 更新

Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Review a manuscript before journal submission
  • Examine research methods and statistical validity
  • Challenge core arguments and alternative explanations
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills47442026年10月20日 更新

查看 brycewang-stanford 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题