跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

advmat-workflow

Use when deciding which advmat-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from scope-fit through revision for an Advanced Materials (Adv. Mater.) manuscript. Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md7.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Advanced Materials Workflow (advmat-workflow)

Overview

This is the router. It does not do the work of any specialized skill; it names which advmat- skill fits your current stage* and hands off.

Default assumption: unless told otherwise, the target is Advanced Materials (Adv. Mater.) — Wiley-VCH's flagship materials-science journal. The defining bar is a genuine materials-science advance (a new material, mechanism, or property — not an incremental improvement) that is rigorously characterized by multiple complementary techniques, ideally carried through to a device-level demonstration benchmarked against the state of the art, and communicated with cover-quality figures. If the work is solid but incremental or narrowly functional, its home is more likely Advanced Functional Materials, Advanced Science, Small, or Advanced Materials Interfaces, and advmat-scope-fit will say so.

When to trigger

  • User asks "what should I do next?" on a materials manuscript
  • User drops a draft and needs the current bottleneck diagnosed
  • User is unsure whether the result is "Adv. Mater.-worthy" or belongs in a sibling Advanced-portfolio journal
  • The manuscript is over the Communication/Article length format and content must be re-partitioned
  • User received a Wiley reviewer report and needs to switch into response mode

Routing table

Current symptomNext skill
Unsure if the advance is novel / broad enough for Adv. Mater.advmat-scope-fit
Result is real but the "why this is an advance" is unclearadvmat-results-framing
Characterization is thin, or the experimental section sprawlsadvmat-methods
Figures are dense; no cover-quality lead figure or TOC graphicadvmat-figures
Manuscript leans on the SI; reader can't follow without itadvmat-supplementary
Prose is wordy, hedged, or not Wiley house styleadvmat-writing-style
Over the Communication (~4 pp) or Article (~10 pp) format budgetadvmat-length-management
Need a cover letter that argues advance + broad impactadvmat-cover-letter
Ready to submit; need format / file / metadata preflightadvmat-submission
Choosing suggested/opposed referees; anticipating objectionsadvmat-referee-strategy
Received a reviewer report or editor decision; need to respondadvmat-revision

Default order

  1. advmat-scope-fit — settle the advance + broad-impact gate first; redirect to a sibling journal if it fails
  2. advmat-results-framing — lock the single central advance and its significance
  3. advmat-methods — make the multi-technique characterization airtight; full experimental detail to the SI
  4. advmat-figures — design the lead figure and the TOC graphic to convey the advance at a glance
  5. advmat-supplementary — partition extended data / methods into Supporting Information; the paper must stand alone
  6. advmat-writing-style — Wiley house style, concision, defined nomenclature and units
  7. advmat-length-management — fit the Communication or Article format (display items and words counted together)
  8. advmat-cover-letter — argue the advance + broad-impact case to the editors
  9. advmat-submission — final preflight (format, files, article type, ORCID, TOC graphic)
  10. advmat-referee-strategy — suggested / opposed referees; pre-empt the characterization / benchmarking objections
  11. advmat-revision — after the reviewer reports arrive

advmat-writing-style and advmat-length-management are late polish stages. Do not trim to the page format before the central advance, characterization, and figures are stable, or you will cut load-bearing evidence.

Decision heuristics

  • "Reviewer 2 will ask 'why not Adv. Funct. Mater.?'" → advmat-scope-fit
  • "I can state the material but not why it is a genuine advance" → advmat-results-framing
  • "A referee will say the phase assignment isn't proven" → advmat-methods
  • "My lead figure has ten panels and no single takeaway" → advmat-figures
  • "You can't judge the material without reading the SI" → advmat-supplementary
  • "I'm over the page limit and every figure is huge" → advmat-length-management
  • "The editor needs to be told why this matters beyond my subfield" → advmat-cover-letter
  • "Submitting tonight" → advmat-submission
  • "Who should I suggest as a referee?" → advmat-referee-strategy
  • "Three reviewer reports just landed" → advmat-revision

Manuscript status board

Readiness is a two-column question: is the science settled, and does it fit the format? Fill this board before invoking advmat-submission; any cell still marked OPEN routes you back to the named skill.

ADV. MATER. STATUS BOARD                  verdict   owner skill
========================================  ========  =====================
GATE  materials advance + broad impact    OPEN      advmat-scope-fit
      (fails → retarget AFM / Adv.Sci.)
ADVANCE one central new material /        OPEN      advmat-results-framing
      mechanism / property, stated plainly
CHAR  multi-technique characterization     OPEN      advmat-methods
      proves structure→property claim
FIG   lead figure + TOC graphic =          OPEN      advmat-figures
      the advance at a glance
SI    paper stands alone; SI holds         OPEN      advmat-supplementary
      extended data / full experimental
STYLE Wiley house style, units defined     OPEN      advmat-writing-style
FIT   inside Communication / Article        OPEN      advmat-length-management
      format (display items counted)
CASE  cover letter argues advance+impact    OPEN      advmat-cover-letter
REFS  suggested / opposed referees named    OPEN      advmat-referee-strategy
----------------------------------------  --------  ---------------------
all rows CLOSED → advmat-submission preflight → submit
reviewer report arrives → advmat-revision

Differences vs. sibling Advanced-portfolio journals

Advanced Materials shares Wiley-VCH production and rigor standards with Advanced Functional Materials, Advanced Science, Small, and Advanced Materials Interfaces, but differs on the gate:

  • Adv. Mater.: a broadly significant materials advance — a new material, mechanism, or property that reshapes how a field thinks. Incremental optimization is declined on impact grounds even when flawless.
  • AFM / Small / Adv. Sci. / AMI: excellent, rigorous, but appropriately specialist or incremental work with a well-defined audience.

If advmat-scope-fit returns a "specialist / incremental" verdict, retarget rather than fighting the impact gate.

Anti-patterns

  • Do not skip advmat-scope-fit — editors triage on advance/impact first; a wrong-venue paper burns a submission cycle
  • Do not run advmat-length-management before the science is stable — you will cut characterization the referees need
  • Do not let the Supporting Information become the place where the real evidence hides
  • Do not draft advmat-revision responses before you have actually changed the manuscript and added the requested data

Durable norms only. Verify current word/page limits, article types, formats, and policies on the official Wiley Advanced Materials author page.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills12952026年9月27日 更新

Use when drafting an AAAI author response (rebuttal) under the single short character-limited author-feedback window, the no-URL rule, no-new-results guidance, AI-generated-review handling, and the AAAI two-phase review process where Phase-2 papers receive one feedback round before SPC/AC discussion.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills12952026年9月27日 更新

Use when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills12952026年9月27日 更新

Use when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and reproducibility-checklist alignment for Phase-1 survival.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills12952026年9月27日 更新

Use when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills12952026年9月27日 更新

Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that Phase-1 reviewers use to judge rigor across AAAI's broad AI scope.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills12952026年9月27日 更新

查看 brycewang-stanford 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题