跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

aistats-submission

Use when auditing an AISTATS submission for OpenReview readiness, abstract/full-paper deadlines, the 8-page submission body, double-blind anonymity, supplementary material, reproducibility checklist, dual-submission policy, reviewer volunteer requirements, desk-reject triggers, and final-week submission sequencing.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md3.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

AISTATS Submission

Use this for an AISTATS paper submission audit. Reopen the current Call for Papers, OpenReview group, style files, FAQ, and proceedings instructions before giving deadline-ready advice.

Submission audit

  • Confirm the target is the main AISTATS conference, not a workshop or tutorial.
  • Verify OpenReview profiles, conflicts, subject areas, title, abstract, author list, and reviewer-volunteer obligations before the abstract and full-paper deadlines.
  • Apply the current style file without spacing, margin, font, or bibliography hacks. AISTATS 2026 used 8 pages of main text for submission, excluding references and appendices.
  • Submit supplementary material by the current supplement deadline. In 2026 this was a separate deadline after the main paper deadline, and supplementary uploads were optional but had to remain anonymous.
  • Include or complete the reproducibility checklist if the current cycle requires it.
  • Enforce double-blind anonymity in paper text, appendix, supplement, code/data, file names, metadata, repository links, acknowledgements, grants, and self-citations.
  • Check concurrent-submission rules and prior-publication status. Do not put the same work under review at another archival venue when AISTATS forbids it.

Blocking risks

  • Late abstract or full-paper upload.
  • Overlength main text or modified style.
  • Non-anonymized supplement, metadata, repository, or appendix.
  • Missing reproducibility checklist or required OpenReview fields.
  • Dual submission to another archival venue.
  • Unclear statistical evidence, weak baselines, or missing uncertainty analysis.

Desk-reject and triage table

TriggerSeverity at AISTATSRepair window
Overlength main textDesk rejectNone after the deadline
Style-file tamperingDesk reject or chair flagNone
Identity leak in PDF or supplementDesk rejectNone
Checklist contradicting the paperReview-stage damageOnly before the deadline
Theorem assumptions absent from the bodyReview-stage damageFixable in the writing pass

Final-week sequence for a theory-plus-experiments paper

  1. Freeze theorem statements and renumber assumptions; reviewers cross-reference labels.
  2. Regenerate every figure from seeded scripts so supplement and PDF cannot diverge.
  3. Fill the checklist against what the paper actually contains, not what is planned.
  4. Strip PDF metadata, notebook authorship fields, and repository owner strings.
  5. Confirm the OpenReview abstract matches the PDF abstract word for word.

Format anchors

  • AISTATS uses a two-column PMLR-style layout; display equations and algorithm blocks that fit a one-column draft routinely overflow, so compress math early rather than on deadline night.
  • The page counts cited above describe the 2026 cycle; treat every number as provisional and recheck the current Call for Papers before relying on it.

Output format

[AISTATS readiness] Ready / Needs fixes / Not ready
[Blocking checks] <OpenReview/page/anonymity/supplement/reproducibility/dual-submission>
[Statistical-evidence risk] <one issue>
[Desk-reject risk] <one issue>
[Fix order] <ordered fixes before submission>

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills12992026年9月27日 更新

Use when drafting an AAAI author response (rebuttal) under the single short character-limited author-feedback window, the no-URL rule, no-new-results guidance, AI-generated-review handling, and the AAAI two-phase review process where Phase-2 papers receive one feedback round before SPC/AC discussion.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills12992026年9月27日 更新

Use when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills12992026年9月27日 更新

Use when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and reproducibility-checklist alignment for Phase-1 survival.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills12992026年9月27日 更新

Use when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills12992026年9月27日 更新

Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that Phase-1 reviewers use to judge rigor across AAAI's broad AI scope.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills12992026年9月27日 更新

查看 brycewang-stanford 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题