跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

forensics

Post-mortem investigation for failed GSD workflows — analyzes git history, artifacts, and state to diagnose what went wrong

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md2.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

<objective> Investigate what went wrong during a GSD workflow execution. Analyzes git history, `.planning/` artifacts, and file system state to detect anomalies and generate a structured diagnostic report.

Purpose: Diagnose failed or stuck workflows so the user can understand root cause and take corrective action. Output: Forensic report saved to .planning/forensics/, presented inline, with optional issue creation. </objective>

<execution_context> @${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/workflows/forensics.md </execution_context>

<context> **Data sources:** - `git log` (recent commits, patterns, time gaps) - `git status` / `git diff` (uncommitted work, conflicts) - `.planning/STATE.md` (current position, session history) - `.planning/ROADMAP.md` (phase scope and progress) - `.planning/phases/*/` (PLAN.md, SUMMARY.md, VERIFICATION.md, CONTEXT.md) - `.planning/reports/SESSION_REPORT.md` (last session outcomes)

User input:

  • Problem description: $ARGUMENTS (optional — will ask if not provided) </context>
<process> Read and execute the forensics workflow from @${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/workflows/forensics.md end-to-end. </process>

<success_criteria>

  • Evidence gathered from all available data sources
  • At least 4 anomaly types checked (stuck loop, missing artifacts, abandoned work, crash/interruption)
  • Structured forensic report written to .planning/forensics/report-{timestamp}.md
  • Report presented inline with findings, anomalies, and recommendations
  • Interactive investigation offered for deeper analysis
  • GitHub issue creation offered if actionable findings exist </success_criteria>

<critical_rules>

  • Read-only investigation: Do not modify project source files during forensics. Only write the forensic report and update STATE.md session tracking.
  • Redact sensitive data: Strip absolute paths, API keys, tokens from reports and issues.
  • Ground findings in evidence: Every anomaly must cite specific commits, files, or state data.
  • No speculation without evidence: If data is insufficient, say so — do not fabricate root causes. </critical_rules>

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Add an idea to the backlog parking lot (999.x numbering)

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

buildomator/buildomator942026年10月17日 更新

add-phase

免费

Add phase to end of current milestone in roadmap

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

buildomator/buildomator942026年10月17日 更新

add-tests

免费

Generate tests for a completed phase based on UAT criteria and implementation

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

buildomator/buildomator942026年10月17日 更新

add-todo

免费

Capture idea or task as todo from current conversation context

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

buildomator/buildomator942026年10月17日 更新

Generate AI design contract (AI-SPEC.md) for phases that involve building AI systems — framework selection, implementation guidance from official docs, and evaluation strategy

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

buildomator/buildomator942026年10月17日 更新

Analyze phase dependencies and suggest Depends on entries for ROADMAP.md

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

buildomator/buildomator942026年10月17日 更新

查看 buildomator 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题