跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

analyze-scenario-results

Summarize ScenarioRunner results to see which scenarios passed and which checks failed. Compare runs before and after changes, or analyze recorded driving to produce measurements and plots of vehicle distance and deviation from the lane center.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Reads and summarises ScenarioRunner output — the criteria pass/fail tables from --output/--file, the machine-readable --json and --junit result files, and the criteria JSON written alongside a --record recording — and runs the metrics module (metrics_manager.py) to compute custom measurements over a recorded run offline, without the simulator. Use when the user asks "did the scenario pass", "why did it fail", "summarise these results", "compare these runs", or wants distance/speed/lane metrics from a recording.

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Checking scenario pass and fail results
  • Comparing results before and after controller changes
  • Plotting vehicle distances from a recorded run
  • Measuring deviation from the lane center

包含的文件(5)

  • SKILL.md8.0 KB
  • references/metrics.md6.2 KB
  • scripts/analyze_results.py11.4 KB
  • scripts/check_env.sh6.4 KB
  • scripts/env.sh5.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Analyse scenario results

Paths. scripts/… and references/… below are relative to the directory holding this SKILL.md. Your working directory is the user's project, not that directory, so prefix them with its absolute path or the command is not found.

Three separate things get called "results", and they answer different questions:

ArtefactProduced byAnswers
criteria table--output / --file / --json / --junitdid it pass, and which criterion failed
criteria JSON next to a recording--recordthe full criterion state, for tooling
CARLA recorder log--recordeverything that happened, replayable

The metrics module works off the third one, so anything you did not --record can only be re-measured by re-running.

Instructions

Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Check prerequisites (bash scripts/check_env.sh)
- [ ] Step 2: Summarise the result files you have
- [ ] Step 3: For deeper analysis, run a metric over a recording
- [ ] Step 4: Compare runs if you have more than one

Step 2: Summarise

source scripts/env.sh

python3 scripts/analyze_results.py summary ./results            # a directory of results
python3 scripts/analyze_results.py summary ./results/*.json     # specific files
python3 scripts/analyze_results.py compare ./before ./after      # two runs, criterion by criterion

summary reads .json, .xml (junit) and .txt outputs, normalises them, and prints one line per scenario with the failing criteria named. compare diffs two sets by scenario name and criterion, which is the useful view when you changed a controller and want to know what got worse.

To produce these in the first place, run with the output flags:

cd ../run-scenario
OUTPUT=1 JSON=1 OUTPUT_DIR=./results bash scripts/run_scenario.sh group:ControlLoss

Note the file naming: ScenarioRunner writes <outputDir>/<config name><YYYY-MM-DD-HH-MM-SS>.json with no separator before the timestamp, so names look like ControlLoss_12025-08-14-10-22-31.json. analyze_results.py splits that back apart.

Step 3: Metrics over a recording

Record first — this writes both a .log recording and a <name>.json of criteria:

cd ../run-scenario
RECORD=recordings bash scripts/run_scenario.sh FollowLeadingVehicle_1
# -> $SCENARIO_RUNNER_ROOT/recordings/FollowLeadingVehicle_1.log
#    $SCENARIO_RUNNER_ROOT/recordings/FollowLeadingVehicle_1.json

Then run a metric:

source scripts/env.sh

python3 scripts/analyze_results.py metrics --list      # bundled example metrics

python3 scripts/analyze_results.py metrics \
    --metric "$SCENARIO_RUNNER_ROOT/srunner/metrics/examples/distance_between_vehicles.py" \
    --log recordings/FollowLeadingVehicle_1.log \
    --criteria recordings/FollowLeadingVehicle_1.json

which is a wrapper for

python3 "$SCENARIO_RUNNER_ROOT/metrics_manager.py" \
    --metric <metric.py> --log <recording.log> [--criteria <criteria.json>]

The metrics module needs a running server even though it computes offline: it replays the recording to recover the map and to resolve actor ids to positions. That is the one non-obvious prerequisite.

Bundled examples, in increasing complexity:

MetricWhat it shows
basic_metric.pythe minimum: subclass BasicMetric, implement _create_metric
criteria_filter.pypull specific fields out of the criteria JSON into a table
distance_between_vehicles.pyper-frame distance between two actors, plotted
distance_to_lane_center.pylateral error against the lane centre, plotted

Writing your own is a subclass of BasicMetric with one method; the recording is exposed as a MetricsLog object with get_actor_transforms, get_ego_vehicle_id, get_all_frames and friends. Details in references/metrics.md.

Step 4: What the criteria mean

A failing criterion names the behaviour that broke, not the cause:

Criterion failedRead as
CollisionTestthe ego hit something — check the recording for what
DrivenDistanceTestthe ego did not get far enough: blocked, or the scenario ended early
ActorBlockedTestthe ego stopped and stayed stopped
KeepLaneTest / WrongLaneTest / OnSidewalkTestlateral control or a bad overtake
RunningRedLightTest / RunningStopTesttraffic-control handling
RouteCompletionTest < 100route not finished (route mode)
InRouteTestthe ego left the route corridor — usually a wrong turn
ScenarioTimeoutTesta scenario did not finish in its own budget

"All scenario tests were passed successfully!" on stdout means every criterion passed. "Not all scenario tests were successful" with no table means you forgot --output.

Examples

Example 1: "did my controller pass the control-loss scenarios?"

Run group:ControlLoss with OUTPUT=1 JSON=1 OUTPUT_DIR=./results, then summary ./results. 15 configs, one line each, failures named.

Example 2: "why did FollowLeadingVehicle_1 fail?"

summary says CollisionTest. Re-run with RECORD=recordings, then replay it ([[replay-recording]]) to watch the impact, and run distance_between_vehicles.py to see the gap closing rate.

Example 3: "compare before and after my change"

Two OUTPUT_DIRs, then compare ./before ./after. It reports criteria that flipped in either direction, so a fix that broke something else is visible.

Troubleshooting

Problem: "Not all scenario tests were successful" with no detail Cause: no output flag. Solution: add OUTPUT=1 (stdout) and/or JSON=1.

Problem: no result files in OUTPUT_DIR Cause: --outputDir only takes effect with one of --file/--json/--junit; --output alone prints to stdout. Solution: set JSON=1 as well.

Problem: metrics_manager.py fails with a connection error Cause: it needs a live server to replay against. Solution: start one ([[run-carla-server]]); the map does not matter, the recording names its own.

Problem: the metric runs but every transform is None Cause: actor ids in the recording do not match what the metric asks for, usually because it hard-codes ids from a different run. Solution: resolve ids through MetricsLog.get_ego_vehicle_id() and get_actor_ids_with_role_name() rather than by number.

Problem: --criteria file not found next to the recording Cause: the criteria JSON is written by _record_criteria only when --record was used, and its name is the recording name with .log replaced by .json. Solution: re-run with RECORD=; without it there is no criteria file to pass.

Problem: replaying a recording made by a different CARLA version does nothing Cause: recorder logs are version-specific. Solution: replay with the version that recorded it.

Outputs

A per-scenario pass/fail summary, a criterion-level diff between two runs, or a metric's table/plot over a recording. Nothing is modified: all three modes are read-only over files, plus a replay on the server for metrics.

The metrics API — BasicMetric, MetricsLog, and what the recorder actually stores — is in references/metrics.md.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Add a message type to CARLA's native ROS 2 interface. Create its C++ data structure, serialization code for transmission, type identity hash, registration, and tests, with Docker-based hash calculation and build checks.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding a standard ROS 2 message type missing from CARLA
  • Defining a custom carla_msgs message
  • Investigating type-hash warnings
carla-simulator/carla1.5万2026年10月23日 更新

Extend CARLA’s native ROS 2 interface to publish sensor data or receive vehicle commands. Covers topic implementation, registration, data connections, and verification, plus adding middleware, the communication layer used to exchange messages.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Publish obstacle sensor data to ROS 2
  • Add a topic for vehicle speed commands
  • Integrate another communication middleware
carla-simulator/carla1.5万2026年10月23日 更新

Checks a local CARLA checkout for missing API documentation, outdated references, broken links, and pages absent from navigation. Produces a grouped Markdown report without building the project or running the simulator.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing documentation before a release
  • Finding missing or outdated API references
  • Checking broken links and navigation gaps
carla-simulator/carla1.5万2026年10月23日 更新

Read and display CARLA object bounding boxes, then project them onto a camera image as 2D rectangles. Export an annotated PNG and box coordinates in JSON for object detection annotation work.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding vehicle boxes to a camera image
  • Exporting box coordinates for detection annotations
  • Checking vehicle dimensions
carla-simulator/carla1.5万2026年10月23日 更新

Builds CARLA's ue4-dev branch on Linux, producing the Unreal Engine 4.26 editor, server modules, and an installed Python client package. Fetches required content, optionally compiles native ROS 2 support, and verifies the build against a source-built server.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Building CARLA ue4-dev from source
  • Compiling CARLA with native ROS 2 support
  • Building the Python client for an existing environment
carla-simulator/carla1.5万2026年10月23日 更新

Build CARLA for Unreal Engine 5.8 using CMake, the tool that configures its build process. The skill guides engine setup, optional ROS 2 support, Python API rebuilding, editor builds, and checks that the expected files were actually produced.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Building CARLA for Unreal Engine 5.8
  • Building and verifying native ROS 2 support
  • Rebuilding the Python API after client changes
carla-simulator/carla1.5万2026年10月23日 更新

查看 carla-simulator 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题