跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

analyzing-equity-market-breadth

Evaluates market breadth with advance-decline analysis, new high/low tracking, and sector participation assessment. Use when analyzing market breadth, assessing rally quality, or identifying divergences.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md5.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Analyzing Equity Market Breadth

When To Use

  • Assessing whether a rally or selloff is broad-based or narrow (e.g., concentrated in mega-cap tech)
  • Identifying breadth divergences that precede trend reversals (index making new highs while fewer stocks participate)
  • Evaluating sector rotation patterns and capital flow shifts across market segments
  • Screening for deteriorating internals beneath a stable headline index level
  • Supporting risk-on / risk-off allocation decisions with participation data

Inputs To Gather

  • Advance-decline data: Daily advancers vs. decliners for the target index or exchange (NYSE, NASDAQ, or composite) [VERIFY exchange-specific data source and reporting cutoff time]
  • Cumulative A/D line: Running sum of net advances to establish trend direction
  • New 52-week highs and lows: Daily counts, ideally broken out by exchange
  • Sector-level performance: Returns and A/D ratios for each GICS sector (or equivalent classification)
  • Volume breadth: Up-volume vs. down-volume ratios to weight participation by capital commitment
  • Index composition details: Number of constituents, weighting scheme (cap-weighted, equal-weighted), top-N concentration
  • Time horizon: Intraday, daily, weekly, or multi-week lookback depending on the analysis purpose

Workflow

  1. Establish baseline context

    • Identify the index or universe under analysis (S&P 500, Russell 2000, NASDAQ Composite, etc.)
    • Note the weighting methodology — cap-weighted indices can mask breadth weakness when a handful of large names drive returns
    • Record the analysis date range and comparison periods
  2. Compute advance-decline metrics

    • Calculate daily net advances (advancers minus decliners) and the cumulative A/D line
    • Compare A/D line trend to the price trend of the headline index — flag divergences where the index rises but the A/D line flattens or declines
    • Compute the A/D ratio (advancers / decliners) and note readings above 2:1 (strong breadth) or below 0.5:1 (weak breadth)
  3. Analyze new high / new low data

    • Track the daily count of new 52-week highs minus new 52-week lows (NH-NL differential)
    • A rising index with a shrinking NH-NL differential signals narrowing leadership
    • Sustained negative NH-NL readings during an index advance are a classic bearish divergence signal
  4. Assess sector participation

    • Determine how many of the 11 GICS sectors are trading above their 50-day and 200-day moving averages
    • Identify which sectors are leading vs. lagging — defensive sector leadership (utilities, staples, healthcare) during a rally often signals fragile breadth
    • Flag any single sector contributing a disproportionate share of index returns
  5. Evaluate volume breadth

    • Compare up-volume to down-volume; readings above 90% up-volume ("breadth thrust") are historically bullish confirmation signals [VERIFY specific threshold definitions per the indicator variant used]
    • Persistent low up-volume ratios during price advances suggest lack of conviction
  6. Synthesize and classify breadth regime

    • Classify the current environment: broad participation, narrowing breadth, divergence, or breadth thrust
    • Identify the most actionable signal (e.g., "A/D line divergence persisting for 3+ weeks while index is within 1% of highs")
    • Note any historical analogs if relevant

Output

  • Breadth Summary Table: Date range, index, A/D ratio, cumulative A/D line trend, NH-NL differential, sectors above 50-DMA / 200-DMA, up-volume ratio
  • Divergence Flags: Explicit callouts where breadth metrics conflict with headline index direction, with severity rating (early, developing, confirmed)
  • Sector Participation Map: Heatmap or ranked list showing sector-level breadth contribution
  • Signal Classification: Current breadth regime label with supporting evidence
  • Actionable Implications: What the breadth picture suggests for position sizing, hedging, or sector rotation — framed for trading and execution desks

Quality Checks

  • Confirm data covers the full trading session (not partial or pre-market only) [VERIFY data source timestamp conventions]
  • Cross-check A/D data against at least one independent source to catch reporting errors
  • Ensure new high/low counts use a consistent lookback window (52-week standard; some sources use shorter periods)
  • Verify that sector breakdowns use the same index universe — mixing S&P 500 sector data with Russell 2000 index-level data produces misleading conclusions
  • Flag any days with unusual market structure events (half-days, index rebalances, options expiration) that distort breadth readings
  • Do not present breadth signals as predictive with certainty — note historical base rates and false-positive frequency where available

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Evaluates activist investor campaigns with thesis assessment, proposed changes, and likely outcome analysis. Use when analyzing activist situations, evaluating campaign theses, or assessing activist track records.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

CaseMark/skills462026年10月22日 更新

Evaluates corporate vulnerability to shareholder activism with governance assessment, valuation gaps, and operational improvement opportunities. Use when assessing activist risk, identifying vulnerabilities, or preparing defensive analyses.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

CaseMark/skills462026年10月22日 更新

Evaluates bolt-on acquisitions for existing platforms with strategic fit, synergy quantification, and return contribution analysis. Use when screening add-on targets, building platform acquisition strategies, or modeling tuck-in economics.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

CaseMark/skills462026年10月22日 更新

Evaluates signal half-life, turnover implications, and capacity constraints for systematic alpha factors. Use when analyzing signal persistence, evaluating factor decay, or estimating strategy capacity.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

CaseMark/skills462026年10月22日 更新

Evaluates alternative data sources including satellite, NLP sentiment, web scraping, and geolocation for alpha signal generation. Use when analyzing alt data, evaluating new data sources, or integrating non-traditional signals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

CaseMark/skills462026年10月22日 更新

Evaluates competition law exposure with market definition, HHI analysis, and remedy estimation for proposed transactions. Use when assessing merger clearance risk, analyzing market concentration, or preparing HSR filings.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

CaseMark/skills462026年10月22日 更新

查看 CaseMark 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题