跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

modeling-clo-cash-flow-waterfalls

Builds CLO waterfall models with coverage tests, reinvestment criteria, and distribution allocation across tranches. Use when modeling CLO structures, analyzing OC/IC tests, or projecting tranche returns.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md6.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Modeling CLO Cash Flow Waterfalls

When To Use

  • Building or auditing a CLO waterfall model from an indenture or offering circular
  • Projecting tranche-level returns under base, stress, and recovery scenarios
  • Analyzing overcollateralization (OC) and interest coverage (IC) test triggers and cure mechanics
  • Evaluating reinvestment period behavior including par-building trades and discretionary trading
  • Comparing equity distributions across deal vintages or managers

Inputs To Gather

  • Capital structure: Tranche names, ratings, par amounts, spreads/coupons, payment frequency, and stated maturity vs. legal final
  • Collateral pool: Par balance, WAS (weighted average spread), WAC (weighted average coupon), WARF (weighted average rating factor), WAL, diversity score, and CCC bucket concentration
  • Coverage test triggers: OC and IC trigger levels and cure thresholds for each tranche (typically Class A/B OC, Class A/B IC, etc.)
  • Reinvestment criteria: Reinvestment period end date, reinvestment target par, concentration limits, collateral quality tests (minimum WAS, maximum WARF, minimum diversity, CCC cap)
  • Default and recovery assumptions: CDR (constant default rate), CPR (constant prepayment rate), recovery rate, and recovery lag in months
  • Fee structure: Senior management fee (bps), subordinate management fee (bps), trustee/admin fees, and incentive management fee waterfall position
  • Payment dates and day count: Quarterly vs. semi-annual, Act/360 vs. 30/360 [VERIFY against indenture]

Workflow

  1. Map the priority of payments from the indenture

    • Build the interest waterfall: trustee/admin fees → senior management fee → Class A interest → Class A OC/IC test → Class B interest → Class B OC/IC test → subordinate management fee → incentive fee → equity distributions
    • Build the principal waterfall: scheduled principal → turbo amortization from failed coverage tests → reinvestment bucket (during reinvestment period) → sequential principal paydown (post-reinvestment)
    • Identify any payment-in-kind (PIK) toggle provisions on mezzanine tranches
  2. Build the collateral cash flow engine

    • Project monthly or quarterly interest collections from the pool using WAS, applying CPR and CDR vectors
    • Model defaults: apply CDR to performing par, subtract defaulted par, apply recovery rate after the specified lag period
    • Track performing par balance period-over-period: beginning par − scheduled amortization − prepayments − defaults + recoveries + reinvestment purchases
    • During the reinvestment period, reinvest principal proceeds at the reinvestment target spread subject to collateral quality test constraints
  3. Implement coverage tests

    • OC test: (performing par + principal cash) / tranche par outstanding — compare to trigger level each payment date
    • IC test: interest collections (net of senior expenses) / tranche interest due — compare to trigger level each payment date
    • On test failure: divert interest proceeds to accelerate principal paydown of the senior-most tranche until test is cured or tranche is retired
    • Track cure status period-over-period — a cured test restores normal waterfall flow on the next payment date
  4. Run the distribution waterfall each period

    • Allocate interest collections top-down per the interest priority of payments
    • Allocate principal collections per the principal waterfall (reinvestment vs. sequential paydown)
    • Calculate equity distributions as the residual after all obligations are met
    • Compute tranche-level IRR, WAL, yield-to-worst, and dollar price for each rated tranche
  5. Stress testing and scenario analysis

    • Base case: consensus CDR (e.g., 2%), CPR (e.g., 20%), recovery (e.g., 70%, 12-month lag)
    • Stress case: elevated CDR (e.g., 4–6%), lower recoveries (e.g., 40–50%), extended lag
    • Front-loaded vs. back-loaded default timing vectors
    • Reinvestment spread compression scenarios (e.g., reinvesting at WAS − 50 bps)
    • Sensitivity tables: equity IRR and rated tranche WAL across CDR/recovery matrices

Output

  • Waterfall schedule: Period-by-period table showing interest collections, principal collections, fee payments, tranche interest payments, OC/IC test results (pass/fail with ratios), principal paydowns, and equity distributions
  • Coverage test dashboard: OC and IC ratios each period with trigger levels, cushion (bps above trigger), and cure/fail status
  • Tranche return summary: IRR, yield, WAL, and expected principal window for each tranche across base and stress scenarios
  • Equity return profile: Equity IRR, cash-on-cash multiple, and distribution timeline under each scenario
  • Sensitivity matrix: Two-variable tables (CDR vs. recovery, CDR vs. reinvestment spread) showing equity IRR and mezzanine tranche breakeven

Quality Checks

  • Par balance roll-forward reconciles each period: beginning par − amort − prepays − defaults + recoveries + reinvestments = ending par
  • Total cash distributed (fees + interest + principal + equity) equals total cash collected each period — no leakage
  • Coverage test ratios match hand-calculated spot checks for at least three periods
  • OC test failure correctly triggers interest diversion and principal turbo in the waterfall
  • Tranche stated maturities and legal final dates are correctly enforced — no payments after legal final [VERIFY]
  • Reinvestment ceases on the reinvestment period end date and the model switches to sequential amortization
  • Equity IRR is consistent with market context (broadly syndicated CLO equity typically targets 12–18% unlevered) — flag outliers for review
  • CDR, CPR, and recovery assumptions are explicitly stated and sourced; if assumed, mark with [VERIFY]

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Evaluates activist investor campaigns with thesis assessment, proposed changes, and likely outcome analysis. Use when analyzing activist situations, evaluating campaign theses, or assessing activist track records.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

CaseMark/skills462026年10月23日 更新

Evaluates corporate vulnerability to shareholder activism with governance assessment, valuation gaps, and operational improvement opportunities. Use when assessing activist risk, identifying vulnerabilities, or preparing defensive analyses.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

CaseMark/skills462026年10月23日 更新

Evaluates bolt-on acquisitions for existing platforms with strategic fit, synergy quantification, and return contribution analysis. Use when screening add-on targets, building platform acquisition strategies, or modeling tuck-in economics.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

CaseMark/skills462026年10月23日 更新

Evaluates signal half-life, turnover implications, and capacity constraints for systematic alpha factors. Use when analyzing signal persistence, evaluating factor decay, or estimating strategy capacity.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

CaseMark/skills462026年10月23日 更新

Evaluates alternative data sources including satellite, NLP sentiment, web scraping, and geolocation for alpha signal generation. Use when analyzing alt data, evaluating new data sources, or integrating non-traditional signals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

CaseMark/skills462026年10月23日 更新

Evaluates competition law exposure with market definition, HHI analysis, and remedy estimation for proposed transactions. Use when assessing merger clearance risk, analyzing market concentration, or preparing HSR filings.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

CaseMark/skills462026年10月23日 更新

查看 CaseMark 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题