跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

modeling-event-driven-trading-analysis

Analyzes event-driven opportunities with catalyst identification, pricing efficiency assessment, and risk/reward evaluation. Use when analyzing event-driven situations, evaluating catalysts, or assessing event timing.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md5.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Modeling Event Driven Trading Analysis

When To Use

  • Evaluating M&A arbitrage spreads (merger arb, tender offers, spin-offs)
  • Analyzing corporate actions as catalysts (earnings, restructurings, dividend changes, share buybacks)
  • Assessing regulatory or legal event outcomes (FDA decisions, antitrust rulings, litigation verdicts)
  • Pricing event-driven situations where a discrete catalyst will resolve pricing uncertainty within a known timeframe
  • Screening for mispriced optionality around scheduled or anticipated corporate/macro events

Inputs To Gather

  • Event specification: Type of event, expected date or date range, involved entities, and deal/event terms
  • Security data: Current price, implied volatility, options chain (if applicable), historical price action around prior similar events, short interest, borrow cost
  • Deal/event terms: Consideration offered (cash, stock, mixed), conditions precedent, regulatory approvals required, breakup/termination fees [VERIFY deal terms against latest proxy/filing]
  • Comparable precedents: Historical completion rates for similar event types, typical timeline from announcement to close, historical spread behavior
  • Market microstructure: Liquidity profile, bid-ask spreads, average daily volume, institutional ownership concentration
  • Risk factors: Identified deal/event risks—antitrust, financing contingencies, shareholder vote thresholds, MAC clauses

Workflow

  1. Classify the event type and define the scenario tree

    • Identify the primary catalyst (e.g., merger close, FDA approval, earnings surprise)
    • Map discrete outcomes: success/close, failure/break, modified terms, delayed timeline
    • Assign initial probability estimates to each branch based on precedent data
  2. Establish pricing under each scenario

    • For M&A: calculate deal-close value (offer price adjusted for proration, collar, CVR), break price (standalone or re-rate target)
    • For binary events (FDA, litigation): estimate upside and downside price targets using comps, DCF, or historical event-day moves
    • For earnings/guidance: model beat/miss/inline scenarios with magnitude estimates anchored to consensus dispersion
  3. Compute expected value and spread analysis

    • Calculate probability-weighted expected return across scenarios
    • Annualize the gross spread for time-value comparison: Annualized Return = (Gross Spread / Current Price) × (365 / Days to Close)
    • Compare annualized return to cost of capital, financing costs, and borrow costs for short legs
  4. Assess risk/reward asymmetry

    • Calculate downside-to-upside ratio: D/U = |Break Loss| / |Deal Gain|
    • Determine implied probability of completion priced into the current spread: Implied Prob = Downside / (Downside + Upside)
    • Compare implied probability to your estimated probability—identify edge or lack thereof
  5. Model timing and carry dynamics

    • Estimate timeline to resolution with confidence intervals
    • Calculate carry cost: financing, borrow fees, dividend differentials, opportunity cost
    • Stress-test returns under delayed-close scenarios (e.g., +30, +60, +90 days)
  6. Run sensitivity analysis

    • Vary completion probability (±10–20%) and observe impact on expected return
    • Vary break price (±5–15% from base case) to capture valuation uncertainty
    • Test portfolio-level impact if running multiple event positions simultaneously
  7. Construct position sizing and hedging framework

    • Size based on Kelly criterion or fractional-Kelly given confidence level
    • Identify hedging instruments: put spreads for downside, index hedges for systematic risk, pairs for sector exposure
    • Define stop-loss triggers tied to fundamental milestones (e.g., regulatory objection, financing withdrawal) rather than arbitrary price levels

Output

  • Event summary table: Event type, key dates, involved parties, current spread, implied probability
  • Scenario matrix: Each outcome branch with probability, target price, return, and annualized return
  • Expected value calculation: Probability-weighted return, edge vs. implied market pricing
  • Risk metrics: Downside/upside ratio, max loss, carry cost per month, breakeven hold period
  • Sensitivity tables: Return sensitivity to probability changes, break-price changes, and timeline delays
  • Position recommendation: Suggested sizing, entry levels, hedge structure, and catalyst-driven exit triggers

Quality Checks

  • Implied probability derived from the spread must be internally consistent with the scenario prices used
  • Annualized returns must account for actual expected days-to-close, not just announced target date
  • Break price estimates should be supported by at least two independent methods (comps, pre-announcement price, DCF)
  • Verify all deal terms against the most recent SEC filing or equivalent disclosure [VERIFY]
  • Confirm borrow availability and cost for any short legs before finalizing the model [VERIFY]
  • Cross-check event timeline against regulatory calendars (e.g., HSR waiting periods, FDA PDUFA dates) [VERIFY]
  • Flag any position where gross spread is less than 2× estimated carry cost as marginal
  • Ensure scenario probabilities sum to 100% and no outcome branch is omitted

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Evaluates activist investor campaigns with thesis assessment, proposed changes, and likely outcome analysis. Use when analyzing activist situations, evaluating campaign theses, or assessing activist track records.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

CaseMark/skills462026年10月22日 更新

Evaluates corporate vulnerability to shareholder activism with governance assessment, valuation gaps, and operational improvement opportunities. Use when assessing activist risk, identifying vulnerabilities, or preparing defensive analyses.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

CaseMark/skills462026年10月22日 更新

Evaluates bolt-on acquisitions for existing platforms with strategic fit, synergy quantification, and return contribution analysis. Use when screening add-on targets, building platform acquisition strategies, or modeling tuck-in economics.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

CaseMark/skills462026年10月22日 更新

Evaluates signal half-life, turnover implications, and capacity constraints for systematic alpha factors. Use when analyzing signal persistence, evaluating factor decay, or estimating strategy capacity.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

CaseMark/skills462026年10月22日 更新

Evaluates alternative data sources including satellite, NLP sentiment, web scraping, and geolocation for alpha signal generation. Use when analyzing alt data, evaluating new data sources, or integrating non-traditional signals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

CaseMark/skills462026年10月22日 更新

Evaluates competition law exposure with market definition, HHI analysis, and remedy estimation for proposed transactions. Use when assessing merger clearance risk, analyzing market concentration, or preparing HSR filings.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

CaseMark/skills462026年10月22日 更新

查看 CaseMark 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题