跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

marketing-copywriting

Writes and edits marketing copy for any surface — homepage, product and pricing pages, ads, emails, and collateral — and sharpens existing copy that is not working. Use this to write or rewrite page copy, tighten a draft, fix copy that is vague or feature-led, adapt one message across formats, or review copy before it ships.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md2.9 KB
  • references/sources.md1.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Marketing copywriting

Before writing a word

Settle four things. Copy written without them is decoration:

  • Who is reading, and what they already believe.
  • What one thing they should understand afterward.
  • What they should do, singular.
  • What is stopping them — the actual objection, not the polite version.

Writing

Lead with the consequence, not the mechanism. People buy what a thing lets them do. The feature is evidence for the claim, not the claim.

Specific beats superlative, always. "Cuts invoice processing from three days to twenty minutes" outperforms "dramatically faster" because it can be believed and checked. Every superlative is a claim your competitor also makes.

Write the way the reader talks. Their words, from research or support tickets, not internal vocabulary. If a phrase only exists inside the company, it does not go on the page.

One idea per section, in the reader's order — problem they recognize, why existing options fail, what you do differently, proof, what to do next. Not your org chart's order.

Every claim carries proof nearby: a number, a name, a screenshot, a quote. A page of unbacked claims reads as marketing and is discounted wholesale.

Editing

Edit in passes; doing them at once does none of them.

  1. Structure — is the order right, and is anything missing or duplicated? Fix this before sentences.
  2. Cut — remove every sentence that does not advance the argument. Then cut the first paragraph, which is usually warm-up.
  3. Sharpen — replace abstractions with specifics, passive with active, hedges with claims.
  4. Read aloud — anything you stumble over gets rewritten. This catches what silent reading does not.

Kill on sight

Empty openers ("In today's fast-paced world"), we-focused framing where you-focused works, hedges that weaken a true claim, feature lists with no consequence attached, and any adjective a competitor could equally use.

Sources

references/sources.md in this skill lists the outside authorities that settle the questions here — what each one is authoritative for, and what you may do with it. Check them before answering on anything they cover, and cite what you used. Most are free to read and not free to reproduce; the use note on each is binding.

Never

  • Write before you know what the reader should do next.
  • Edit for elegance before the argument is right. Polished copy for the wrong claim is the more expensive mistake.
  • Approve copy nobody read aloud. Rhythm problems are inaudible on the page.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Designs and audits who can reach what — authentication, authorization models, privileged access, service credentials, and joiner-mover-leaver process. Use this to design a permissions model, run an access review, reduce standing privilege, handle offboarding, set up SSO or MFA, manage service and machine credentials, or diagnose why permissions have sprawled.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

cbrock84/headcount20802026年10月19日 更新

Concentrates marketing and sales effort on a named set of accounts rather than on volume — qualifying whether the model fits your economics at all, building the account list and the buying group inside each, tiering effort against account value, coordinating so the account experiences one campaign rather than several, and measuring account progression instead of leads. Use this to decide whether to run an account-based program, build one, or work out why an existing one produces activity and no pipeline.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

cbrock84/headcount20802026年10月19日 更新

Gets new users from signup to first real value — signup flow, onboarding, time-to-value, and the early experience that determines whether someone becomes a user or a lapsed account. Use this to design or fix signup and onboarding, diagnose why signups do not convert to active use, reduce time-to-value, or decide what a new user must accomplish first.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

cbrock84/headcount20802026年10月19日 更新

Designs orchestrator-and-subagent hierarchies for a repository — splitting agents by exclusive write surface, pairing every producer with an independent auditor, and enforcing the split with a script that runs in CI. Use this whenever the user wants to set up, expand, audit, or fix a multi-agent or subagent structure for a codebase; asks how to divide work between agents; wants agent charters, roles, or a surface map written; or is hitting agents that collide on the same files, review their own work, or drift from their remit. Also use when sizing a roster or deciding whether a new agent is justified.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

cbrock84/headcount20802026年10月19日 更新

Governs models and AI systems in production — intended use, evaluation, monitoring, human oversight, documentation, and the decision to deploy or retire. Use this before deploying a model or AI feature, when defining evaluation criteria, when a model's behavior has drifted, when assessing AI risk or regulatory exposure, or when deciding whether an AI system is fit for a consequential decision.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

cbrock84/headcount20802026年10月19日 更新

Produces executive-level research — market sizing, competitor mapping, trend analysis, and strategic intelligence — grounded in cited sources with the confidence in each claim made explicit. Use this to analyze a market or industry, map competitors, evaluate a market-entry or build-versus-buy decision, produce a research brief, or assemble evidence for a decision. Also use when comparing options that need a structured, evidence-based verdict rather than an opinion.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

cbrock84/headcount20802026年10月19日 更新

查看 cbrock84 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题