跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

systems-administration

Runs servers and corporate systems — patching, configuration baselines, change control, capacity, and the routine that prevents incidents. Use this to establish a patching cadence, standardize server configuration, plan a maintenance window, decide change control for infrastructure, or clean up systems that have drifted from any known state.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md3.2 KB
  • references/sources.md1.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Systems administration

Well-run systems are boring. The work is in the routine that keeps them that way, and almost every serious incident traces back to a routine that was skipped.

Cloud environment design belongs to technology:cloud-infrastructure; this is operating the systems the company runs on.

Configuration baselines and drift

Every system class needs a defined baseline: build, hardening, agents, logging, accounts. Systems built by hand from memory diverge immediately and cannot be reasoned about as a group.

Drift is the real enemy. Detect it continuously and correct rather than document — a system that no longer matches its baseline is a system whose behavior under patching or failover is unknown.

The strongest form is disposability: rebuild rather than repair. A system you can rebuild in an hour never accumulates the sediment of a decade of manual fixes.

Patching as a cadence

Set a regular, predictable window and hold it. Ad hoc patching means patching happens when someone worries, which is never in proportion to actual risk.

Tier by exposure: internet-facing systems on the shortest cycle, then internal, then isolated. Emergency patching is a separate path with its own authority, used for actively exploited vulnerabilities — security:vulnerability-management decides what is urgent, this skill executes it.

Track coverage, not activity. "Patching is running" is not an answer; "97% of servers are within 30 days, here are the twelve that are not and why" is.

Change control proportionate to risk

Heavyweight approval for trivial changes produces circumvention, and circumvention produces unrecorded changes, which is worse than no process.

Tier it: standard pre-approved changes, normal changes with review, emergency changes with after-the-fact record. Every change needs an owner, a back-out plan, and a record — the back-out plan being the part most often assumed rather than written.

Maintenance windows exist to make disruption predictable. Announce them, keep them, and finish inside them.

Know what you have

An unmanaged system is a system nobody patches. Reconcile what is running against it-operations:it-asset-management regularly, and treat anything unaccounted for as urgent — the server nobody owns is the one still running an unsupported operating system.

Sources

references/sources.md in this skill lists the outside authorities that settle the questions here — what each one is authoritative for, and what you may do with it. Check them before answering on anything they cover, and cite what you used. Most are free to read and not free to reproduce; the use note on each is binding.

Never

  • Repair a drifted system without correcting the baseline that let it drift.
  • Patch on worry rather than cadence.
  • Make a change with no back-out plan.
  • Leave a discovered unmanaged system unclaimed.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Designs and audits who can reach what — authentication, authorization models, privileged access, service credentials, and joiner-mover-leaver process. Use this to design a permissions model, run an access review, reduce standing privilege, handle offboarding, set up SSO or MFA, manage service and machine credentials, or diagnose why permissions have sprawled.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

cbrock84/headcount20772026年10月19日 更新

Concentrates marketing and sales effort on a named set of accounts rather than on volume — qualifying whether the model fits your economics at all, building the account list and the buying group inside each, tiering effort against account value, coordinating so the account experiences one campaign rather than several, and measuring account progression instead of leads. Use this to decide whether to run an account-based program, build one, or work out why an existing one produces activity and no pipeline.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

cbrock84/headcount20772026年10月19日 更新

Gets new users from signup to first real value — signup flow, onboarding, time-to-value, and the early experience that determines whether someone becomes a user or a lapsed account. Use this to design or fix signup and onboarding, diagnose why signups do not convert to active use, reduce time-to-value, or decide what a new user must accomplish first.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

cbrock84/headcount20772026年10月19日 更新

Designs orchestrator-and-subagent hierarchies for a repository — splitting agents by exclusive write surface, pairing every producer with an independent auditor, and enforcing the split with a script that runs in CI. Use this whenever the user wants to set up, expand, audit, or fix a multi-agent or subagent structure for a codebase; asks how to divide work between agents; wants agent charters, roles, or a surface map written; or is hitting agents that collide on the same files, review their own work, or drift from their remit. Also use when sizing a roster or deciding whether a new agent is justified.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

cbrock84/headcount20772026年10月19日 更新

Governs models and AI systems in production — intended use, evaluation, monitoring, human oversight, documentation, and the decision to deploy or retire. Use this before deploying a model or AI feature, when defining evaluation criteria, when a model's behavior has drifted, when assessing AI risk or regulatory exposure, or when deciding whether an AI system is fit for a consequential decision.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

cbrock84/headcount20772026年10月19日 更新

Produces executive-level research — market sizing, competitor mapping, trend analysis, and strategic intelligence — grounded in cited sources with the confidence in each claim made explicit. Use this to analyze a market or industry, map competitors, evaluate a market-entry or build-versus-buy decision, produce a research brief, or assemble evidence for a decision. Also use when comparing options that need a structured, evidence-based verdict rather than an opinion.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

cbrock84/headcount20772026年10月19日 更新

查看 cbrock84 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题