Mechanical documentation hygiene. Spawns a doc-maintainer agent to audit all project documentation and fix correctness, completeness, freshness, and consistency issues autonomously within its authority. Surfaces anything requiring user judgment for approval.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Spawns a doc-maintainer agent to comprehensively audit all project documentation and fix the issues it finds. The find→fix seam is small — typos, stale code examples, broken links, freshness drift — so the skill runs as a tidy rather than a review.
Spawn a DOC - Maintainer agent with the following prompt:
Perform a comprehensive review of ALL project documentation. This is a
standalone audit — do NOT scope to git diff. Instead, review every
documentation file in the project.
Steps:
1. Discover all documentation files (README.md, CLAUDE.md, CONTRIBUTING.md,
CHANGELOG.md, doc/, docs/, adr/, and any other .md files)
2. Review each for correctness, completeness, and freshness using your
full quality checklist (code-documentation consistency, completeness,
link validation, style consistency, freshness)
3. Fix issues you find autonomously (within your authority)
4. Report what you changed and any issues requiring user approval
If no documentation issues are found, report that and exit.
After the agent completes, present its findings to the user:
If changes were made, ask the user if they want to commit. If yes:
git add [specific files]
git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
docs: tidy project documentation
[Brief description of changes made]
EOF
)"
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问，或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Bug-fixing workflow that coordinates diagnosis, test-driven reproduction, root-cause analysis, and targeted fixes. Use when the user wants to fix a bug with thorough investigation and regression testing.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Proactive bug-hunting workflow. Assesses codebase risk through complexity, coverage, and structural analysis, then spawns focused investigators that write reproducing tests to validate suspected bugs. Thoroughness over speed. Advisory only — produces findings and proposes tickets; does not implement fixes.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Iterative development workflow that coordinates implementation, refactoring, QA, and documentation agents to complete features systematically. Use when the user wants a full development workflow with quality checks.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Multi-ticket batch workflow. Takes a batch of tickets, plans execution order, implements each via /implement in autonomous mode, runs cross-cutting quality passes, and presents results for final review.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Full-lifecycle project workflow. Takes batched tickets, implements via /implement-batch, runs smoke tests, then executes a comprehensive quality pipeline (refactor, review-arch, review-test, tidy-docs, review-release). Maximizes autonomy with andon cord escape.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Autonomous bug-elimination loop. Iteratively invokes /bug-hunt and /implement-batch until findings converge below an operator-specified severity floor. At termination, runs /review-test scoped to the run's new reproducing tests and fixes quality issues above the floor. Auto-approves /bug-hunt and /review-test ticket proposals; pulls the andon cord on contested findings, repeated implementation failure, hard-cap exhaustion, or breaking-change proposals. Optional /refactor finisher.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。