跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

analyzing-tfsec

Use when working with Tfsec — tfsec Terraform security scanning. Covers static analysis of Terraform code, custom rule creation, CI integration, severity filtering, module scanning, and remediation guidance. Use when scanning Terraform configurations for security issues, creating custom security rules, or integrating security checks into CI pipelines.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

集成工具Terraform
查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md8.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

tfsec Terraform Security Scanning Skill

Analyze Terraform configurations for security misconfigurations using tfsec.

MANDATORY: Discovery-First Pattern

Always check tfsec version and scan scope before running analysis.

Phase 1: Discovery

#!/bin/bash

echo "=== tfsec Version ==="
tfsec --version 2>/dev/null

echo ""
echo "=== Terraform Files Found ==="
find . -name "*.tf" -not -path "*/.terraform/*" 2>/dev/null | wc -l | xargs -I{} echo "{} Terraform files"

echo ""
echo "=== Module References ==="
grep -rh 'source\s*=' *.tf modules/ 2>/dev/null | sort -u | head -10

echo ""
echo "=== Custom Rules ==="
ls .tfsec/ 2>/dev/null || echo "No custom rules directory found"
cat .tfsec.yml 2>/dev/null || echo "No tfsec config found"

Core Helper Functions

#!/bin/bash

# tfsec wrapper with JSON output
tfsec_cmd() {
    tfsec "$@" --format json --no-color 2>/dev/null
}

# Scan with severity filter
tfsec_critical() {
    tfsec "$@" --minimum-severity HIGH --format json --no-color 2>/dev/null
}

# Summary extractor
tfsec_summary() {
    jq '{
        total: (.results | length),
        critical: [.results[] | select(.severity == "CRITICAL")] | length,
        high: [.results[] | select(.severity == "HIGH")] | length,
        medium: [.results[] | select(.severity == "MEDIUM")] | length,
        low: [.results[] | select(.severity == "LOW")] | length
    }'
}

Output Rules

  • TOKEN EFFICIENCY: Target <=50 lines per output
  • Use --format json with jq for structured results
  • Use --minimum-severity to focus on critical findings
  • Group results by rule ID for deduplication

Common Operations

Full Security Scan

#!/bin/bash
TARGET="${1:-.}"

echo "=== tfsec Security Scan ==="
tfsec "$TARGET" --format json --no-color 2>/dev/null | jq '{
    summary: {
        total: (.results | length),
        critical: [.results[] | select(.severity == "CRITICAL")] | length,
        high: [.results[] | select(.severity == "HIGH")] | length,
        medium: [.results[] | select(.severity == "MEDIUM")] | length,
        low: [.results[] | select(.severity == "LOW")] | length
    },
    top_findings: [.results | sort_by(.severity) | .[:10][] | {
        rule_id: .rule_id,
        severity: .severity,
        description: .rule_description,
        resource: .resource,
        location: "\(.location.filename):\(.location.start_line)",
        resolution: .resolution
    }]
}'

Scan by Severity

#!/bin/bash
TARGET="${1:-.}"
SEVERITY="${2:-HIGH}"

echo "=== Findings >= $SEVERITY ==="
tfsec "$TARGET" --minimum-severity "$SEVERITY" --format json --no-color 2>/dev/null | jq '{
    count: (.results | length),
    by_rule: [.results | group_by(.rule_id) | .[] | {
        rule: .[0].rule_id,
        severity: .[0].severity,
        description: .[0].rule_description,
        occurrences: length,
        files: [.[].location.filename] | unique
    }] | sort_by(-.occurrences)
}'

Module Security Scan

#!/bin/bash
echo "=== Module Scan ==="
tfsec . --include-ignored --include-passed --format json --no-color 2>/dev/null | jq '{
    passed: [.results[] | select(.status == 0)] | length,
    failed: [.results[] | select(.status != 0)] | length,
    module_findings: [.results[] | select(.resource | contains("module."))] | {
        count: length,
        modules: [.[].resource | split(".")[1]] | unique
    }
}'

echo ""
echo "=== Ignored Findings ==="
grep -rn 'tfsec:ignore' . --include="*.tf" 2>/dev/null | head -15

Custom Rule Management

#!/bin/bash
echo "=== Custom Rules ==="
if [ -d ".tfsec" ]; then
    for rule_file in .tfsec/*.json .tfsec/*.yaml .tfsec/*.yml; do
        [ -f "$rule_file" ] && echo "--- $rule_file ---"
        cat "$rule_file" 2>/dev/null | head -15
    done
else
    echo "No .tfsec directory found"
    echo ""
    echo "To create custom rules, add YAML/JSON files to .tfsec/"
    echo "Example structure:"
    echo "  .tfsec/custom_check.yaml"
fi

echo ""
echo "=== tfsec Configuration ==="
cat .tfsec.yml 2>/dev/null || cat tfsec.yml 2>/dev/null || echo "No config file"

CI Integration Report

#!/bin/bash
TARGET="${1:-.}"

echo "=== CI Report ==="
tfsec "$TARGET" --format json --no-color 2>/dev/null | jq '{
    pass: ((.results | length) == 0),
    findings: (.results | length),
    critical_high: ([.results[] | select(.severity == "CRITICAL" or .severity == "HIGH")] | length),
    files_affected: ([.results[].location.filename] | unique | length),
    rules_triggered: ([.results[].rule_id] | unique | length),
    remediation: [.results | group_by(.rule_id) | .[:5][] | {
        rule: .[0].rule_id,
        count: length,
        fix: .[0].resolution
    }]
}'

echo ""
echo "=== Exit Code Behavior ==="
echo "tfsec exits 1 on findings -- use --soft-fail for non-blocking CI"

Safety Rules

  • Scans are read-only -- tfsec never modifies Terraform files
  • Use --exclude for known false positives rather than ignoring all findings
  • Inline ignores (tfsec:ignore) should include justification comments
  • CI pipelines should start with --soft-fail and tighten over time
  • Custom rules should be reviewed and tested before adding to CI

Output Format

Present results as a structured report:

Analyzing Tfsec Report
══════════════════════
Resources discovered: [count]

Resource       Status    Key Metric    Issues
──────────────────────────────────────────────
[name]         [ok/warn] [value]       [findings]

Summary: [total] resources | [ok] healthy | [warn] warnings | [crit] critical
Action Items: [list of prioritized findings]

Target ≤50 lines of output. Use tables for multi-resource comparisons.

Anti-Hallucination Rules

  1. NEVER assume resource names — always discover via CLI/API in Phase 1 before referencing in Phase 2.
  2. NEVER fabricate metric names or dimensions — verify against the service documentation or --help output.
  3. NEVER mix CLI commands between service versions — confirm which version/API you are targeting.
  4. ALWAYS use the discovery → verify → analyze chain — every resource referenced must have been discovered first.
  5. ALWAYS handle empty results gracefully — an empty response is valid data, not an error to retry.

Counter-Rationalizations

ShortcutCounterWhy
"I'll skip discovery and check known resources"Always run Phase 1 discovery firstResource names change, new resources appear — assumed names cause errors
"The user only asked for a quick check"Follow the full discovery → analysis flowQuick checks miss critical issues; structured analysis catches silent failures
"Default configuration is probably fine"Audit configuration explicitlyDefaults often leave logging, security, and optimization features disabled
"Metrics aren't needed for this"Always check relevant metrics when availableAPI/CLI responses show current state; metrics reveal trends and intermittent issues
"I don't have access to that"Try the command and report the actual errorAssumed permission failures prevent useful investigation; actual errors are informative

Common Pitfalls

  • tfsec is now part of Trivy: tfsec is maintained but Aqua recommends migrating to trivy config
  • Variable resolution: tfsec may not resolve all variable types -- complex expressions may cause false positives
  • Module sources: Remote modules are not scanned by default -- clone locally first
  • Terraform version: tfsec supports HCL2 only -- Terraform 0.11 syntax is not supported
  • Override files: _override.tf files may not be processed correctly in all cases
  • Plan scanning: tfsec scans HCL, not plan output -- some runtime values are unknown at scan time
  • Workspace variables: Different workspace variable values may change security posture -- scan each configuration
  • Rule deprecation: Some rule IDs change between versions -- update CI configurations after upgrades

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Cloudflare GraphQL Analytics for zone traffic, firewall events, Workers metrics, and schema exploration. Use when querying Cloudflare analytics data or exploring the GraphQL API.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

cloudthinker-ai/CloudSkills62026年4月5日 更新

Use when working with Alloydb — google AlloyDB instance analysis, query insights, columnar engine optimization, maintenance windows, and cluster health.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

cloudthinker-ai/CloudSkills62026年4月5日 更新

Use when working with Aqua — aqua Security platform analysis. Covers container runtime protection, image assurance policies, compliance frameworks, vulnerability management, workload protection, and registry scanning. Use when analyzing container security posture, reviewing image compliance, investigating runtime alerts, or auditing security policies.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

cloudthinker-ai/CloudSkills62026年4月5日 更新

Use when working with Bigquery — google BigQuery job analysis, slot utilization, cost analysis, dataset management, and query optimization.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

cloudthinker-ai/CloudSkills62026年4月5日 更新

Use when working with Cassandra — apache Cassandra keyspace analysis, compaction strategies, repair status, nodetool operations, and cluster health monitoring.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

cloudthinker-ai/CloudSkills62026年4月5日 更新

Use when working with Checkov — checkov infrastructure-as-code security scanning. Covers Terraform, CloudFormation, Kubernetes, and Dockerfile scanning, policy management, custom checks, compliance frameworks, and suppression management. Use when scanning IaC for security misconfigurations, evaluating compliance, managing custom policies, or reviewing scan results.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

cloudthinker-ai/CloudSkills62026年4月5日 更新

查看 cloudthinker-ai 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题