Draft, diagnose, and improve IEEE rebuttals, revision plans, cover letters, response letters, and point-by-point replies using routed reviewer-comment handling. Use when responding to IEEE reviewer or editor comments about novelty, scope, method, experiments, baselines, figures, tables, citations, writing, LaTeX formatting, limitations, compliance, technical correctness, or reviewer comments that appear generic, contradictory, unsupported, careless, or possibly AI-generated.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Use this skill to convert reviewer criticism into manuscript actions and precise, respectful point-by-point replies.
Do not write a defensive response. Do not promise changes that the manuscript does not make. Follow the routing protocol and load the selected fragments.
manifest.yaml.always_load.comment_type: novelty / scope / method / experiment / baseline / figure-table / citation / writing / format / limitation / technical-error / review-quality.action_type: add-experiment / add-explanation / revise-text / correct-error / add-citation / improve-figure-table / acknowledge-limitation / disagree-with-evidence.response_stage: rebuttal / major-revision / minor-revision / resubmission / cover-letter.evidence_status: evidence-added / evidence-planned / evidence-unavailable / text-only-fix.tone: standard / concise / very-polite / firm.Default point-by-point format:
Reviewer comment:
Classification:
- comment_type:
- action_type:
- evidence_status:
Response:
[polite, specific response]
Manuscript revision:
[what changed and where]
Evidence:
[new experiment/result/citation/figure/textual clarification]
For multiple comments, add a Revision action list before the detailed responses.
For cover letters, summarize major changes, added experiments, figure/table improvements, and remaining limitations without overselling.
Do not invent page numbers, line numbers, experiments, results, citations, or editor instructions.
Do not say "we have addressed all concerns" unless every concern is visibly addressed.
Do not dismiss reviewer comments as misunderstandings without first improving manuscript clarity.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问，或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Check, clean, verify, and improve IEEE citations, references, BibTeX entries, citation positioning, related-work logic, DOI metadata, venue names, and reference formatting using routed citation and metadata guidance. Use when preparing IEEE manuscripts, fixing bibliography errors, verifying reference completeness, improving related work, checking whether citations support claims, or identifying missing classic/recent baselines.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Design, audit, and strengthen experimental validation for IEEE manuscripts using routed claim-evidence checks. Use when planning experiments, selecting baselines, designing ablations, choosing metrics, checking fairness, adding robustness tests, explaining results, analyzing complexity, building claim-to-evidence matrices, or responding to reviewer concerns about insufficient experiments.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Audit, redesign, generate, and improve IEEE manuscript figures, tables, captions, result presentation, plotting scripts, visual polish, hybrid Python/R plus vector-editor workflows, publication-ready matplotlib house style, and layout using routed visual-evidence checks. Use when checking or creating plot readability, axes, legends, line overlap, table structure, metric reporting, captions, grayscale accessibility, IEEE one-column/two-column layout, figure/table placement, claim-evidence mapping, reviewer first-impression risks, matplotlib/seaborn or ggplot2 figure code, SVG/PDF/TIFF/PNG export, Illustrator/Inkscape/PowerPoint/Figma finishing plans, or IEEE-style engineering evidence graphics.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Diagnose, fix, and improve IEEEtran LaTeX manuscripts using routed template, layout, float, equation, algorithm, table, bibliography, and PDF-compliance guidance. Use when fixing IEEE LaTeX compile errors, overfull boxes, float placement, two-column layout, figure sizing, tables, equations, algorithms, BibTeX, citation commands, template compliance, or final submission PDF checks.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Read, decompose, and analyze IEEE-style papers using routed technical-reading workflows. Use when extracting problem setting, object-method-condition logic, contributions, method pipeline, equations, datasets, baselines, metrics, ablations, limitations, replication details, citation role, related-work positioning, implementation notes, or reviewer-style assessment from a paper, PDF, abstract, or manuscript excerpt.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Polish, translate, diagnose, and restructure technical manuscript text into IEEE-style academic English using routed failure-mode guidance. Use for IEEE abstracts, introductions, related work, methods, experiments, conclusions, figure captions, rebuttals, Chinese-to-English technical writing, AI-like or template-like academic prose, and engineering prose that needs clearer problem logic, contribution framing, method rationale, evidence discipline, natural author voice, or reviewer-ready wording.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。