跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开中文介绍

product-marketing

整理产品特点、目标客户、竞争差异、客户用语和品牌语气,维护共享营销资料,供其他营销技能参考,并记录版本变化与实践经验。

原文查看原文说明

When the user wants to create or update their product marketing context document. Also use when the user mentions 'product context,' 'marketing context,' 'set up context,' 'positioning,' 'who is my target audience,' 'describe my product,' 'ICP,' 'ideal customer profile,' 'brand voice,' 'tone of voice,' 'brand guidelines,' 'what have we learned,' 'log this learning,' or wants to avoid repeating foundational information across marketing tasks. Use this at the start of any new project before using other marketing skills — it creates `.agents/product-marketing.md` that all other skills reference for product, audience, and positioning context.

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • 统一营销工作的基础信息
  • 根据现有资料起草产品介绍
  • 统一客户画像、差异点和品牌语气
  • 记录营销经验和宣传内容调整

中文介绍

功能

本技能会将产品特点、目标客户、与竞争对手的差异、客户用语和品牌语气整理到.agents/product-marketing.md。其他营销技能可以参考这份共享资料,减少每次任务都重新说明基础信息的需要。资料更新时会记录版本号和修改原因,也可以管理营销活动中积累的经验。

适用场景

开始新项目的营销工作之前,或需要统一广告、邮件和社交媒体文案的宣传重点时,可以使用本技能。可以根据README或现有产品介绍页面等资料起草,也可以通过对话逐项补充。目标客户或产品定位发生变化时,也可以用它检查和更新共享信息。

使用示例

  • “请根据README和产品介绍页面,起草一份共享营销资料。”
  • “请整理目标客户和竞争差异,并统一品牌语气。”
  • “请记录这次测试的发现,并注明依据和适用范围。”

注意事项

初稿和更新内容都需要使用者检查。新增营销经验时,只有在使用者批准后才会保存。涉及多人参与采购的人物画像适用于B2B;广告相关项目只在实际投放广告时处理。

本介绍由 AI(OpenAI Codex)根据公开的 SKILL.md 撰写。准确的规格请查看下方原文。

文档检查

AI 根据 SKILL.md 的内容检查了需要注意的操作和使用前提。评分只依据实际运行的结果(实测对比)。

安全性发送数据、删除文件、执行命令等是否有说明
A良好要求使用者检查内容,并在保存经验前取得批准。
安装难易度所需工具和 API 密钥是否少且有说明
A良好没有指定必需工具或密钥,可依据现有资料或对话起草。

不计入评分。 由 AI(OpenAI Codex)于 2026年10月24日 评估。仅供参考,安装前请同时查看原文。

如果您认为评估有误,请申请复核

请写明哪一项有误以及原因。无需登录。我们会对照 SKILL.md 重新评估,并在此处更新结果。

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

包含的文件(3)

  • SKILL.md13.5 KB
  • evals/evals.json7.0 KB
  • references/brand-voice.md8.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Product Marketing Context

You help users create and maintain a product marketing context document. This captures foundational positioning and messaging information that other marketing skills reference, so users don't repeat themselves.

The document is stored at .agents/product-marketing.md.

Workflow

Step 1: Check for Existing Context

First, check if .agents/product-marketing.md already exists. Also check .claude/product-marketing.md and the legacy filename product-marketing-context.md (in either .agents/ or .claude/) for older setups — if found anywhere other than .agents/product-marketing.md, offer to move it to the canonical location.

If it exists:

  • Read it and summarize what's captured — note its current Document version and the last few Changelog entries so the user sees where the doc stands and what's changed recently
  • Ask which sections they want to update
  • Only gather info for those sections
  • On any substantive save, bump the version and add a changelog entry (see Step 4). This doc is the shared context every other marketing skill reads, so a dated paper trail of what changed and why is worth keeping.

If it doesn't exist, offer two options:

  1. Auto-draft from codebase (recommended): You'll study the repo—README, landing pages, marketing copy, package.json, etc.—and draft a V1 of the context document. The user then reviews, corrects, and fills gaps. This is faster than starting from scratch.

  2. Start from scratch: Walk through each section conversationally, gathering info one section at a time.

Most users prefer option 1. After presenting the draft, ask: "What needs correcting? What's missing?"

Step 2: Gather Information

If auto-drafting:

  1. Read the codebase: README, landing pages, marketing copy, about pages, meta descriptions, package.json, any existing docs
  2. Draft all sections based on what you find
  3. Present the draft and ask what needs correcting or is missing
  4. Iterate until the user is satisfied

If starting from scratch: Walk through each section below conversationally, one at a time. Don't dump all questions at once.

For each section:

  1. Briefly explain what you're capturing
  2. Ask relevant questions
  3. Confirm accuracy
  4. Move to the next

Push for verbatim customer language — exact phrases are more valuable than polished descriptions because they reflect how customers actually think and speak, which makes copy more resonant.


Sections to Capture

1. Product Overview

  • One-line description
  • What it does (2-3 sentences)
  • Product category (what "shelf" you sit on—how customers search for you)
  • Product type (SaaS, marketplace, e-commerce, service, etc.)
  • Business model and pricing

2. Target Audience

  • Target company type (industry, size, stage)
  • Target decision-makers (roles, departments)
  • Primary use case (the main problem you solve)
  • Jobs to be done (2-3 things customers "hire" you for)
  • Specific use cases or scenarios

3. Personas (B2B only)

If multiple stakeholders are involved in buying, capture for each:

  • User, Champion, Decision Maker, Financial Buyer, Technical Influencer
  • What each cares about, their challenge, and the value you promise them

4. Problems & Pain Points

  • Core challenge customers face before finding you
  • Why current solutions fall short
  • What it costs them (time, money, opportunities)
  • Emotional tension (stress, fear, doubt)

5. Competitive Landscape

  • Direct competitors: Same solution, same problem (e.g., Calendly vs SavvyCal)
  • Secondary competitors: Different solution, same problem (e.g., Calendly vs Superhuman scheduling)
  • Indirect competitors: Conflicting approach (e.g., Calendly vs personal assistant)
  • How each falls short for customers

6. Differentiation

  • Key differentiators (capabilities alternatives lack)
  • How you solve it differently
  • Why that's better (benefits)
  • Why customers choose you over alternatives

7. Objections & Anti-Personas

  • Top 3 objections heard in sales and how to address them
  • Who is NOT a good fit (anti-persona)

8. Switching Dynamics

The JTBD Four Forces:

  • Push: What frustrations drive them away from current solution
  • Pull: What attracts them to you
  • Habit: What keeps them stuck with current approach
  • Anxiety: What worries them about switching

9. Customer Language

  • How customers describe the problem (verbatim)
  • How they describe your solution (verbatim)
  • Words/phrases to use
  • Words/phrases to avoid
  • Glossary of product-specific terms

10. Brand Voice

  • 3-5 voice attributes, each with what it means, what it doesn't mean, and a real line from existing copy
  • Tone by context: how the voice shifts for support, launches, errors, sales, and social
  • Brand words: terms you own, words you never use (with the reason)

Build this from copy that already performed and from the founder's own writing, rather than from adjectives picked in a meeting. See references/brand-voice.md for the extraction steps, a worked profile, before/after examples, and per-person voice guides.

11. Proof Points

  • Key metrics or results to cite
  • Notable customers/logos
  • Testimonial snippets
  • Main value themes and supporting evidence

12. Goals

  • Primary business goal
  • Key conversion action (what you want people to do)
  • Current metrics (if known)

13. Paid Ads (optional, only if they run ads)

The ads skill reads this so the user doesn't re-explain the account every session.

  • Margin reality: the target CPA or ROAS that keeps the business profitable, and the hard floor (the ROAS below which, or CPA above which, to flag immediately)
  • Budget and pacing: monthly budget and acceptable daily variance
  • Conversion truth: which conversion actions count and what each is worth, known tracking weaknesses (lag, double counting, offline gaps), and what separates a good lead from a form fill
  • Campaign naming convention and what each campaign is for, one line each
  • What the agent may do (read, compare, flag, draft, recommend) and may not do without approval (change budgets or bids, pause or launch, edit tracking, publish ads)

14. Learnings

Start this empty. It fills up as work ships (see "Maintaining Learnings" below).


Step 3: Create the Document

After gathering information, create .agents/product-marketing.md with this structure:

# Product Marketing Context

**Document version:** v1
**Last updated:** [date]

## Product Overview
**One-liner:**
**What it does:**
**Product category:**
**Product type:**
**Business model:**

## Target Audience
**Target companies:**
**Decision-makers:**
**Primary use case:**
**Jobs to be done:**
-
**Use cases:**
-

## Personas
| Persona | Cares about | Challenge | Value we promise |
|---------|-------------|-----------|------------------|
| | | | |

## Problems & Pain Points
**Core problem:**
**Why alternatives fall short:**
-
**What it costs them:**
**Emotional tension:**

## Competitive Landscape
**Direct:** [Competitor] — falls short because...
**Secondary:** [Approach] — falls short because...
**Indirect:** [Alternative] — falls short because...

## Differentiation
**Key differentiators:**
-
**How we do it differently:**
**Why that's better:**
**Why customers choose us:**

## Objections
| Objection | Response |
|-----------|----------|
| | |

**Anti-persona:**

## Switching Dynamics
**Push:**
**Pull:**
**Habit:**
**Anxiety:**

## Customer Language
**How they describe the problem:**
- "[verbatim]"
**How they describe us:**
- "[verbatim]"
**Words to use:**
**Words to avoid:**
**Glossary:**
| Term | Meaning |
|------|---------|
| | |

## Brand Voice
| Attribute | Means | Doesn't mean | Example line |
|-----------|-------|--------------|--------------|
| | | | |

**Tone by context:**
- Support:
- Launch:
- Errors:
- Sales:
- Social:
**Terms we own:**
**Never use (and why):**

## Proof Points
**Metrics:**
**Customers:**
**Testimonials:**
> "[quote]" — [who]
**Value themes:**
| Theme | Proof |
|-------|-------|
| | |

## Goals
**Business goal:**
**Conversion action:**
**Current metrics:**

## Paid Ads (optional)
**Target CPA / ROAS:**
**Hard floor:**
**Monthly budget and daily variance:**
**Conversions that count:**
| Action | Means | Value | Feeds bidding? |
|--------|-------|-------|----------------|
| | | | |
**Known tracking weaknesses:**
**Good lead vs. form fill:**
**Campaigns:** [name] — [what it's for]
**Agent may:** read, compare, flag, draft, recommend
**Agent may not (without approval):** change budgets or bids, pause or launch, edit tracking, publish ads

## Learnings
*Decisions and tested lessons. Newest first. Keep it to about 20 active entries.*
| Date | Learning | Evidence | Applies to | Status |
|------|----------|----------|------------|--------|
| | | | | |

## Changelog
*Newest first. One line per revision: what changed and why.*
- v1 ([date]) — Initial context.

Step 4: Confirm, Version, and Save

  • Show the completed document
  • Ask if anything needs adjustment
  • Set the version and changelog — this is the paper trail for a doc every other skill reads:
    • New document: set Document version: v1 and a single Changelog entry — - v1 ([today]) — Initial context.
    • Updating an existing document: increment the version (v2 → v3 …), update Last updated to today, and prepend a new Changelog entry at the top of the list (newest first) summarizing what changed and why in one line. Never rewrite or reorder past entries.
    • A good entry names the sections touched and the reason, not "updated the doc." Examples:
      • - v3 (2026-07-16) — Repositioned from "email tool" to "deliverability platform"; added RevOps to the ICP.
      • - v2 (2026-06-02) — Rewrote value prop and objections after 5 customer interviews; added competitor Acme.
    • Use today's date in ISO form (YYYY-MM-DD) for the entry and Last updated.
    • Pure typo-only fix: don't bump the version or add a changelog entry — just save the correction. Every other change bumps the version and gets an entry. When the change is a real repositioning, say so plainly — downstream skills will now generate against the new context.
  • Save to .agents/product-marketing.md
  • Tell them: "Other marketing skills will now use this context automatically. The Changelog at the bottom tracks every revision — check it to see how your positioning has evolved. Run /product-marketing anytime to update it."

Maintaining Learnings

The Changelog records how the document changed. Learnings records what the team found out by shipping: which angles won, which offers flopped, which decisions were made and why. Drafting skills (copywriting, emails, ads, ad-creative, social) read it before writing so the next brief starts from what's already known.

Entry format: one row per learning.

  • Learning: one sentence, specific enough to change a draft. "Price-anchored headlines beat outcome headlines on the pricing page" works. "Be clearer" doesn't.
  • Evidence: the test, campaign, or source, with the number and sample size. "Variant B +18% trial starts, 2,400 visitors per arm, 3 weeks."
  • Applies to: the channels, segments, or skills it affects.
  • Status: active, watch (one data point, worth retesting), or retired.

What earns a place:

  • A test result that reached its planned sample, or the same pattern seen in two or more campaigns
  • A decision the user made with a reason (positioning, pricing, a channel cut) that future drafts must respect
  • A correction the user gave more than once ("never call it a platform")

What doesn't: single-run anecdotes (log those as watch or leave them out), task notes, and anything that belongs in another section. A new objection goes in Objections; a new customer phrase goes in Customer Language.

When to retire an entry: a later test contradicts it, the product or market changed underneath it (new pricing, new ICP), or it hasn't been relevant for two quarters. Change the status to retired and add a line saying why, rather than deleting it, so nobody re-tests a settled question. Move retired rows to the bottom, and archive them once the table passes about 20 active rows.

Who writes it: any skill that finishes a test, campaign, or postmortem may propose a row. Show the proposed row to the user and add it on approval, with a version bump and a Changelog line like any other substantive change. Loops that run on a schedule do this through their session-end step (see marketing-loops).


Tips

  • Be specific: Ask "What's the #1 frustration that brings them to you?" not "What problem do they solve?"
  • Capture exact words: Customer language beats polished descriptions
  • Ask for examples: "Can you give me an example?" unlocks better answers
  • Validate as you go: Summarize each section and confirm before moving on
  • Skip what doesn't apply: Not every product needs all sections (e.g., Personas for B2C, Paid Ads if they don't run ads)

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

ab-testing

免费有简介

规划页面改动的A/B测试,从提出假设、确定指标,到估算样本量、测试时长和流量分配,并帮助解读结果、排序实验方案及记录持续改进中的经验。

  • 比较标题或注册按钮
  • 估算样本量和测试时长
  • 检查结果及可能的不利影响
coreyhaines31/marketingskills5.6万2026年10月23日 更新

ad-creative

免费有简介

为不同广告平台撰写标题、正文及静态或视频创意方案。结合投放表现和顾客反馈拓展文案,检查格式限制,并制定可衡量的测试假设,用于下一轮优化。

  • 撰写符合字数限制的搜索广告
  • 根据广告表现开发新方案
  • 依据顾客评价策划静态广告
coreyhaines31/marketingskills5.6万2026年10月23日 更新

ads

免费有简介

为 Google Ads、Meta、LinkedIn 等平台规划和复核付费广告,整理受众、预算、竞价策略,并依据获客成本和销售数据评估效果,区分已知事实、假设与缺失信息。

  • 选择广告平台并分配预算
  • 根据投放结果决定后续行动
  • 排查搜索广告中的无效支出
coreyhaines31/marketingskills5.6万2026年10月23日 更新

ai-seo

免费有简介

调查品牌在AI搜索回答中的展示和引用情况,检查内容结构、依据与网站访问设置,整理改进方向,帮助AI系统获取关键信息。

  • 查看AI搜索是否引用品牌
  • 改进文章的回答结构和依据
  • 调查AI无法读取网站的原因
coreyhaines31/marketingskills5.6万2026年10月23日 更新

analytics

免费有简介

为营销和产品决策规划并验证数据追踪,定义事件、配置 GA4 和 Google Tag Manager、统一活动链接的 UTM 命名,并按相同时间段计算指标。

  • 规划注册与购买事件追踪
  • 排查事件未发送或重复
  • 统一活动链接的 UTM 命名
coreyhaines31/marketingskills5.6万2026年10月23日 更新

aso

免费有简介

检查 App Store 或 Google Play 的应用页面,从六个方面评分,并给出总分、按优先级排列的文案与图片视频改进建议,也可比较竞品。

  • 通过商店链接诊断页面
  • 改进应用名称或说明
  • 检查截图和预览视频
coreyhaines31/marketingskills5.6万2026年10月23日 更新

查看 coreyhaines31 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题