Audit recent high-relevance papers from a target venue to identify claim-relevant experimental evidence gaps after core P0 results exist. Use for venue completeness and reviewer-risk analysis; not for redefining the research question or running experiments.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
实测评分 未实测
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Run only when the Orchestrator authorizes the audit and P0 is substantially complete. Start with python tools/context_view.py show --role venue, then read referenced Claim-Evidence and gap artifacts. Read docs/PROTOCOLS.md, docs/ROLE_HANDOFFS.md, docs/CONTEXT_POLICY.md and docs/EVIDENCE_COMPLETION_PROTOCOL.md on a fresh context or changed hash. Reuse an existing dated source set only when its task, venue, freshness and coverage still fit; search further for changed expectations or unresolved gaps. Context savings never justify skipping relevant papers or negative evidence.
Analyze 5-10 recent, highly relevant papers, prioritizing same task, research question, method class, venue and recency. Record search date, sources, relevance, inclusion/exclusion reasons and uncertainty. Stop once core expectations, material gaps and high-ROI actions are stable; do not expand into a systematic review. Compare datasets, baselines, metrics, seed/statistical practice, ablations, sensitivity, robustness, generalization, efficiency, complexity, qualitative analysis and figure/table conventions.
Produce an Evidence Gap Matrix with current status, venue frequency, Claim relevance, reviewer risk, estimated cost, information gain and recommended priority. Recommendations do not enter the queue automatically. A common but Claim-irrelevant experiment is P3/SKIP. Do not alter the Research Spine, Primary Claims or Method, and report any positioning concern only as risk.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问，或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Direct a claim-driven research experiment project from post-Idea intake through method realization, prioritized evidence collection, Human Gates, and Evidence Freeze. Use for scientific planning, state transitions, queues, budgets, or recovery; not for running code or independently auditing results.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Implement and execute approved research Experiment, Tuning, or Design Cards with reproducible logs, metrics, environment, and artifacts. Use for bounded coding, debugging, and runs; not for changing claims, priorities, budgets, or the Research Spine.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Validate and scientifically interpret completed research runs, including negative, null, boundary, confounded, failed, and inconclusive outcomes. Use after execution to assess evidence and claim impact; not to edit methods or schedule experiments.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。