Guide accessibility reviews for UI, documents, and workflows. Use for WCAG-oriented audits, keyboard review, semantics, contrast, and remediation planning.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when creating decision-complete plans through grounding, capped clarification, subagent delegation, and critic iteration.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Use this workflow package for non-trivial planning work where the agent must produce a structured plan before implementation, handoff, or approval.
Ground first: inspect available repo files, docs, config, schemas, current GitHub state, or local system facts before asking the user. Do not ask questions that non-mutating inspection can answer.
Clarify only when it materially changes the plan. Ask at most three user questions total, one at a time, using the reverse decision-tree style from ls/docs/DECISION_TREE_WORKFLOW.md: A-D options, preferred choice, and rationale. Use available question/input/TUI tooling when supported; otherwise render clear markdown or plain-text choices. This three-question cap is local to this planning workflow and does not change the default ls-wf-spec-clarify-reverse protocol.
For non-trivial plans, use subagents when they reduce risk or context load: explorer for broad repo discovery, researcher for current external facts, tester for validation plans or long command logs, and reviewer as an independent critic when that materially improves evidence and is available and authorized. Keep the controller responsible for verification, checkpoints, and final plan quality. Do not force delegation for trivial direct tasks or when direct execution is the only useful route.
Review plans for requirement coverage, resolved decisions, grounding evidence, verification, safety, and scope. Use an independent critic when it materially improves evidence and is available and authorized. Repeat review after material corrections or when material findings remain; do not impose a minimum number of rounds or a numeric satisfaction quota. Turn unresolved prerequisites into explicit blockers, and keep the controller responsible for decision completeness. Submit the resulting plan through the active client's plan-submission mechanism; do not require literal <proposed_plan> output.
Primary references: ls/docs/DECISION_TREE_WORKFLOW.md, ls/docs/WORKFLOW_STANDARD.md, ls/docs/WORKFLOW_PACKAGES.md, and ls/docs/SKILLS_AND_RULES.md.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Guide accessibility reviews for UI, documents, and workflows. Use for WCAG-oriented audits, keyboard review, semantics, contrast, and remediation planning.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when choosing a LocalSetup Agent-* lane for exploration, research, bounded implementation, or review. Consult the static capability matrix; do not probe account or network availability.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Guide agent email inbox workflows with prompt-injection defenses. Use for inbound email processing, webhooks, routing, and safety review.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Navigate and understand codebases using agentlens hierarchical documentation. Use when exploring new projects, finding modules, locating symbols in large files, finding TODOs/warnings, or understanding code structure.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use for Agent Q signed encrypted file-drop or mail ship and ingest, private registry v2 setup, queue status, and transport maintenance.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Inventory wrapper for the alirezarezvani Claude skills bundle. Use when triaging its broad skill catalog and large script surface before any targeted import.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。