跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

n8n-code-javascript

Write JavaScript for n8n Code nodes to aggregate, filter, and transform workflow data. Guidance covers data access, output formats, execution modes, common errors, and performance choices when processing large numbers of records.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Write JavaScript code in n8n Code nodes. Use when writing JavaScript in n8n, using $input/$json/$node syntax, making HTTP requests with this.helpers / the $helpers global, working with dates using DateTime, troubleshooting Code node errors, choosing between Code node modes, or doing any custom data transformation in n8n. Always use this skill when a workflow needs a Code node — whether for data aggregation, filtering, API calls, format conversion, batch processing logic, or any custom JavaScript. Covers SplitInBatches loop patterns, cross-iteration data, pairedItem, and real-world production patterns. Also use when asked why a Code node or workflow is slow, which execution mode is faster, or how to cut per-item overhead on large datasets. EXCEPTION — for the AI-agent-callable Custom Code Tool (@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.toolCode, a tool attached to an AI Agent), use the n8n-code-tool skill instead; it has a different runtime contract.

集成工具n8n
查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Aggregating and deduplicating multiple records
  • Transforming complex API responses
  • Fixing data access and return format errors
  • Reviewing slow processing of large datasets

包含的文件(6)

  • SKILL.md19.3 KB
  • BUILTIN_FUNCTIONS.md21.8 KB
  • COMMON_PATTERNS.md30.6 KB
  • DATA_ACCESS.md21.5 KB
  • ERROR_PATTERNS.md23.4 KB
  • README.md9.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

JavaScript Code Node

Expert guidance for writing JavaScript code in n8n Code nodes.


Quick Start

// Basic template for Code nodes
const items = $input.all();

// Process data
const processed = items.map(item => ({
  json: {
    ...item.json,
    processed: true,
    timestamp: new Date().toISOString()
  }
}));

return processed;

Essential Rules

  1. Choose "Run Once for All Items" mode (recommended for most use cases)
  2. Access data: $input.all(), $input.first(), or $input.item
  3. Return [{json: {...}}] — the canonical, mode-portable form. In Run Once for All Items mode n8n also auto-wraps a bare return {…} object, so that runs too; what genuinely fails is returning a primitive (string/number) or null.
  4. CRITICAL: Webhook data is under $json.body (not $json directly)
  5. Built-ins available: this.helpers.httpRequest() (no auth — the bare $helpers global is undefined in the task-runner sandbox, so $helpers.httpRequest() throws ReferenceError: $helpers is not defined), DateTime (Luxon), $jmespath(). Not available: this.helpers.httpRequestWithAuthentication (deny-listed), $env (when N8N_BLOCK_ENV_ACCESS_IN_NODE=true), require() (unless allowlisted). For anything beyond a trivial unauthenticated GET (auth, pagination, retries), prefer the HTTP Request node and keep Code nodes for pure logic.
  6. Instance-allowlisted libraries: Self-hosted instances can allowlist modules via N8N_RUNNERS_ALLOWED_BUILT_IN_MODULES and N8N_RUNNERS_ALLOWED_EXTERNAL_MODULES (legacy: NODE_FUNCTION_ALLOW_BUILTIN / NODE_FUNCTION_ALLOW_EXTERNAL). If the user says their instance allows specific modules (e.g. axios, lodash, crypto), use them via require() — don't refuse. If unsure, ask or default to built-ins only.
  7. Wrong skill? If you're writing code for a Custom Code Tool attached to an AI Agent (@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.toolCode), stop — that node has a different contract (input via query, must return a string, no $input/$helpers). Use the n8n-code-tool skill.

Mode Selection Guide

The Code node offers two execution modes. Choose based on your use case:

Run Once for All Items (Recommended - Default)

Use this mode for: 95% of use cases

  • How it works: Code executes once regardless of input count
  • Data access: $input.all() or items array
  • Best for: Aggregation, filtering, batch processing, transformations, API calls with all data
  • Performance: Faster for multiple items (single execution)
// Example: Calculate total from all items
const allItems = $input.all();
const total = allItems.reduce((sum, item) => sum + (item.json.amount || 0), 0);

return [{
  json: {
    total,
    count: allItems.length,
    average: total / allItems.length
  }
}];

When to use:

  • ✅ Comparing items across the dataset
  • ✅ Calculating totals, averages, or statistics
  • ✅ Sorting or ranking items
  • ✅ Deduplication
  • ✅ Building aggregated reports
  • ✅ Combining data from multiple items

Run Once for Each Item

Use this mode for: Specialized cases only

  • How it works: Code executes separately for each input item
  • Data access: $input.item or $item
  • Best for: Item-specific logic, independent operations, per-item validation
  • Performance: Slower for large datasets (multiple executions)
// Example: Add processing timestamp to each item
const item = $input.item;

return [{
  json: {
    ...item.json,
    processed: true,
    processedAt: new Date().toISOString()
  }
}];

When to use:

  • ✅ Each item needs independent API call
  • ✅ Per-item validation with different error handling
  • ✅ Item-specific transformations based on item properties
  • ✅ When items must be processed separately for business logic

Decision Shortcut:

  • Need to look at multiple items? → Use "All Items" mode
  • Each item completely independent? → Use "Each Item" mode
  • Not sure? → Use "All Items" mode (you can always loop inside)

Why "All Items" is faster — the per-item boundary

Mode choice is the single biggest performance lever in a Code node. Each per-item execution context costs a setup tax (measured on n8n 2.x, small records):

What runs per itemApprox. cost
Code All Items (one run for the whole set)~0.02 ms/item
Expression in any node (IF / Set / etc.)~0.2 ms/item
Code Each Item (a full sandbox per item)~0.6 ms/item — ~25–30× All Items

So Run Once for Each Item over 10k items is ~6 s of pure overhead vs ~0.2 s in Run Once for All Items. Use Each Item only when an item genuinely needs isolating (independent error handling, or a per-item API call you can't batch); otherwise loop inside one All Items node. Expression complexity itself is essentially free (~90% of the cost is the per-item context, not your code) and every node→node hop re-copies all items — so reduce the number of per-item boundaries, don't micro-optimize each one. Below a few hundred items none of this matters; reach for it on the hot path (large item counts, little I/O).

See: DATA_ACCESS.md → "Mode Performance" for the corollaries, hop costs, and scale check.


Data Access Patterns

Four ways to pull data from upstream nodes. Note $node["Name"] and $('Name') need .first().json or .all() — never .json directly.

const allItems = $input.all();          // 1. All items — batch ops, aggregation (most common)
const data = $input.first().json;       // 2. First item — single objects, API responses
const item = $input.item;               // 3. Current item — "Each Item" mode ONLY (undefined otherwise)
const other = $node["Webhook"].json;    // 4. Named node — combine data across nodes

Always access fields via .json (e.g. item.json.name, not item.name), and prefer the explicit $input.first().json.field over a bare $json.field.

See: DATA_ACCESS.md for the full guide — every pattern with examples, a decision tree, and the common mistakes (mutating originals, missing length checks, $input.item in the wrong mode).


Critical: Webhook Data Structure

MOST COMMON MISTAKE: Webhook data is nested under .body

// ❌ WRONG - Will return undefined
const name = $json.name;
const email = $json.email;

// ✅ CORRECT - Webhook data is under .body
const name = $json.body.name;
const email = $json.body.email;

// Or with $input
const webhookData = $input.first().json.body;
const name = webhookData.name;

Why: Webhook node wraps all request data under body property. This includes POST data, query parameters, and JSON payloads.

See: DATA_ACCESS.md for full webhook structure details


Return Format Requirements

Canonical form: [{json: {...}}] — an array of objects each with a json property. It is unambiguous and works identically in both execution modes, so make it your default.

In Run Once for All Items mode n8n auto-normalizes looser shapes on the way out: a single bare object, or an array of bare objects, gets wrapped under json for you. So return {foo: 1} runs. What has nothing to wrap — and therefore genuinely fails at runtime with "Code doesn't return items properly" — is a primitive (string/number/boolean) or null/undefined. (n8n-mcp ≥ 2.63.0 no longer flags a bare-object return as an error; it reflects this auto-wrap behavior.)

Correct Return Formats

// ✅ Single result
return [{
  json: {
    field1: value1,
    field2: value2
  }
}];

// ✅ Multiple results
return [
  {json: {id: 1, data: 'first'}},
  {json: {id: 2, data: 'second'}}
];

// ✅ Transformed array
const transformed = $input.all()
  .filter(item => item.json.valid)
  .map(item => ({
    json: {
      id: item.json.id,
      processed: true
    }
  }));
return transformed;

// ✅ Empty result (when no data to return)
return [];

// ✅ Conditional return
if (shouldProcess) {
  return [{json: processedData}];
} else {
  return [];
}

Non-Canonical Returns (auto-wrapped — prefer the canonical form)

// ⚠️ Auto-wrapped in All Items mode → [{json: {field: value}}]. Runs, but prefer the array form.
return {
  json: {field: value}
};

// ⚠️ Auto-wrapped → [{json: {field: value}}]. Runs, but add the json wrapper for clarity.
return [{field: value}];

// ✅ Fine — input items already carry a json property, so returning them unchanged is a valid passthrough
return $input.all();

Genuinely Broken Returns

// ❌ FAILS: primitive — n8n errors "Code doesn't return items properly"
return "processed";

// ❌ FAILS: null / undefined — nothing to pass to the next node
return null;

Why it matters: The canonical [{json: {...}}] is unambiguous and behaves the same in both modes. n8n auto-normalizes bare objects and arrays-of-objects in All Items mode, but a primitive or null return has nothing to wrap and stops execution.

See: ERROR_PATTERNS.md #3 for detailed error solutions


Common Patterns Overview

The most useful Code node shapes from production workflows. One quick example — sum/aggregate across all items:

const items = $input.all();
const total = items.reduce((sum, item) => sum + (item.json.amount || 0), 0);
return [{ json: { total, count: items.length, average: total / items.length } }];

The full library covers 10 patterns: multi-source aggregation, regex filtering, markdown/structured-text parsing, JSON comparison, CRM/form transformation, release processing, array transformation with computed fields, Slack Block Kit formatting, top-N ranking, and string-aggregation reporting — each with variations.

See: COMMON_PATTERNS.md for the 10 detailed production patterns (and the Best Practices section: validate input, try-catch, filter-early, array methods over loops, console.log debugging).


Error Prevention - Top Mistakes

The recurring Code node failures, in rough frequency order:

  1. Empty code / missing return — always end with return [...], and make sure every branch returns.
  2. Expression syntax as code — don't write {{ }} where JavaScript belongs (return {{ $json.x }} is a syntax error). Use `${$json.field}` or $input.first().json.field. {{ }} inside a string literal is fine — it's just literal text n8n won't evaluate.
  3. Return shape — prefer return [{json:{...}}]. A bare return {…} auto-wraps in All Items mode, but returning a primitive (string/number) or null is what actually fails.
  4. Missing null checks — use optional chaining: item.json?.user?.email || 'fallback'.
  5. Webhook body nesting — $json.email is undefined; use $json.body.email.
  6. Auth helpers blocked (httpRequestWithAuthentication) and $env blocked — route secrets through credentials/HTTP Request node, not the Code node sandbox.

See: ERROR_PATTERNS.md for the comprehensive guide — each error with wrong/right code, escaping rules, the sandbox restrictions (Errors #6–#7), a prevention checklist, and a quick error-message lookup table.


Built-in Functions & Helpers

// HTTP requests (no auth — see sandbox note below)
const res = await this.helpers.httpRequest({ method: 'GET', url: 'https://api.example.com/data' });

// DateTime (Luxon): now, formatting, arithmetic
const now = DateTime.now();
const formatted = now.toFormat('yyyy-MM-dd');
const tomorrow = now.plus({ days: 1 });

// $jmespath() — query JSON structures
const adults = $jmespath($input.first().json, 'users[?age >= `18`]');

// $getWorkflowStaticData() — data that persists across executions

Sandbox (since n8n v2.0, JsTaskRunnerSandbox): the accessor is this.helpers.httpRequest() — the bare $helpers global is undefined here ($helpers.httpRequest() throws ReferenceError). Inside a nested async function where this is lost, call it as await fn.call(this, ...). this.helpers.httpRequestWithAuthentication and this.helpers.requestWithAuthenticationPaginated are deny-listed (→ UnsupportedFunctionError); for authenticated calls use an HTTP Request node with the credential (preferred), a sub-workflow, or a manual Authorization: Bearer ${token} header on this.helpers.httpRequest() only when the token already flows through the workflow as data. $env is blocked when N8N_BLOCK_ENV_ACCESS_IN_NODE=true; require() works only for allowlisted modules. Buffer, URL, and standard JS globals (Math, JSON, Object, Array) always work.

See: BUILTIN_FUNCTIONS.md for the complete reference — full httpRequest options, all DateTime/Luxon operations, JMESPath patterns, static-data use cases, and the sandbox-restriction details.


Best Practices

  • Validate input first — guard for empty arrays / missing .json before processing.
  • Try-catch risky work (HTTP calls) and return an error object instead of crashing.
  • Prefer array methods (filter/map/reduce) over manual loops.
  • Filter early, transform late — shrink the dataset before expensive work.
  • Descriptive names and console.log() for debugging (output goes to the browser console).

See: COMMON_PATTERNS.md → "Best Practices" for code examples of each.


Production Gotchas

Hard-won lessons from real deployments — summarized here, with code in DATA_ACCESS.md → "Production Gotchas":

  • SplitInBatches outputs are counterintuitive: main[0] = done (fires once, after all batches), main[1] = each batch (the loop body). Add a Limit 1 node after the done output as a safety.
  • Iteration count is the cost: each loop iteration re-runs the whole body through the engine (~0.8 ms overhead each). batchSize: 1 is the loop equivalent of Each Item — use the largest batch your real constraint (rate limit, page size, memory) allows, or don't loop at all.
  • Cross-iteration accumulation (CRITICAL): after the loop, $('Node Inside Loop').all() returns ONLY the last iteration's items. Accumulate via $getWorkflowStaticData('global') (reset before, push inside, read after).
  • pairedItem: when emitting items that don't map 1:1 to input, set pairedItem: { item: i } or downstream Set nodes fail with paired_item_no_info.
  • Node reference syntax: $('Node').first().json or $('Node').all() — never .json directly on the reference.
  • Float precision: compare currency at the cent level — Math.round(a*100) !== Math.round(b*100) — to avoid false positives from float noise.

When to Use Code Node

Before reaching for a Code node, walk the transform gatekeeper in the n8n Expression Syntax skill: expression → arrow-function IIFE inside an Edit Fields field → Code node, in that order. The first two paths cover most "transform this data" tasks at ~1–10ms each, versus the Code node's sandboxed ~500–1000ms — a ~100x gap on pure single-item shaping, with no functional difference. The Code node earns its place only for whole-dataset aggregation ($input.all()), allowlisted libraries, or async work. And before writing code for crypto (HMAC, hashing, signing) or XML/SOAP/RSS parsing, check for a native node — n8n has a Crypto node (nodes-base.crypto) and an XML node (nodes-base.xml) that cover those without any JavaScript. Dropping into Code for something a native node already does is one of the most common false positives.

Use Code node when:

  • ✅ Complex transformations requiring multiple steps
  • ✅ Custom calculations or business logic
  • ✅ Recursive operations
  • ✅ API response parsing with complex structure
  • ✅ Multi-step conditionals
  • ✅ Data aggregation across items

Consider other nodes when:

  • ❌ Simple field mapping → Use Set node
  • ❌ Basic filtering → Use Filter node
  • ❌ Simple conditionals → Use IF or Switch node
  • ❌ HTTP requests only → Use HTTP Request node

Code node excels at: Complex logic that would require chaining many simple nodes


Integration with Other Skills

Works With:

n8n Expression Syntax:

  • Expressions use {{ }} syntax in other nodes
  • Code nodes use JavaScript directly (no {{ }})
  • When to use expressions vs code

n8n MCP Tools Expert:

  • How to find Code node: search_nodes({query: "code"})
  • Get configuration help: get_node({nodeType: "nodes-base.code"})
  • Validate code: validate_node({nodeType: "nodes-base.code", config: {...}})

n8n Node Configuration:

  • Mode selection (All Items vs Each Item)
  • Language selection (JavaScript vs Python)
  • Understanding property dependencies

n8n Workflow Patterns:

  • Code nodes in transformation step
  • Webhook → Code → API pattern
  • Error handling in workflows

n8n Validation Expert:

  • Validate Code node configuration
  • Handle validation errors
  • Auto-fix common issues

Quick Reference Checklist

Before deploying Code nodes, verify:

  • Code is not empty - Must have meaningful logic
  • Return statement exists - Returns items, not a primitive/null
  • Canonical return format - Each item: {json: {...}} (bare objects auto-wrap, but be explicit)
  • Data access correct - Using $input.all(), $input.first(), or $input.item
  • No {{ }} written as code - Use JavaScript template literals: `${value}`
  • Error handling - Guard clauses for null/undefined inputs
  • Webhook data - Access via .body if from webhook
  • Mode selection - "All Items" for most cases
  • Performance - Prefer map/filter over manual loops
  • Output consistent - All code paths return same structure

Additional Resources

Related Files

n8n Documentation


Ready to write JavaScript in n8n Code nodes! Start with simple transformations, use the error patterns guide to avoid common mistakes, and reference the pattern library for production-ready examples.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Design AI agents and chatbots in n8n, choosing suitable nodes and connecting models, tools, conversation memory, and structured JSON output. Includes guidance on document retrieval and human approval before tool execution.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Building a chatbot with conversation memory
  • Connecting external tools to an AI agent
  • Returning data in a defined JSON format
czlonkowski/n8n-mcp2.3万2026年10月18日 更新

Build n8n workflows that download, transform, and send files without losing their contents. Learn how file data differs from JSON, how to preserve attachments, and how to use storage keys or URLs with AI tools and chat messages.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Fixing attachments lost during data transformation
  • Passing uploaded files to AI agent tools
  • Displaying generated images in chat
czlonkowski/n8n-mcp2.3万2026年10月18日 更新

Write Python for n8n Code nodes to transform, filter, aggregate, and validate workflow data. Get guidance on reading input items, returning the required JSON structure, using standard library modules, and avoiding common errors within n8n's Python execution modes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Transforming and filtering data in n8n with Python
  • Calculating totals and basic statistics
  • Extracting and validating text with regular expressions
czlonkowski/n8n-mcp2.3万2026年10月18日 更新

Build custom calculation and parsing tools that an n8n AI Agent can call. This skill covers JavaScript or Python inputs, structured arguments, string results, tool descriptions, and fixes for invocation and output errors.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding a calculation tool to an AI Agent
  • Defining typed inputs for multiple arguments
  • Fixing tool output type errors
czlonkowski/n8n-mcp2.3万2026年10月18日 更新

Add error handling to n8n workflows with connected error outputs, retries, and failure notifications. Return HTTP status codes that explain what went wrong, distinguish invalid requests from service failures, and keep internal error details out of public responses.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Investigating workflows that fail without notification
  • Returning clear errors from webhook APIs
  • Retrying temporary network failures
czlonkowski/n8n-mcp2.3万2026年10月18日 更新

Write and troubleshoot n8n expressions, the formulas that pass and transform data between workflow steps. Covers field references, webhook inputs, dates, strings, and choosing between expressions and Code nodes for data transformations.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Fixing expression syntax errors
  • Using webhook data in downstream steps
  • Formatting dates and strings
czlonkowski/n8n-mcp2.3万2026年10月18日 更新

查看 czlonkowski 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题