跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

Scale Game

Test at extremes (1000x bigger/smaller, instant/year-long) to expose fundamental truths hidden at normal scales

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md2.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Scale Game

Overview

Test your approach at extreme scales to find what breaks and what surprisingly survives.

Core principle: Extremes expose fundamental truths hidden at normal scales.

Quick Reference

Scale DimensionTest At ExtremesWhat It Reveals
Volume1 item vs 1B itemsAlgorithmic complexity limits, index needs
SpeedInstant vs year-longAsync requirements, caching needs, timeouts
Users1 user vs 1B usersConcurrency issues, resource limits, auth bottlenecks
DurationMilliseconds vs yearsMemory leaks, state growth, data rot
Failure rateNever fails vs always failsError handling adequacy, retry logic
Data size1 byte vs 1TBStorage strategy, streaming vs buffering

Process

  1. Pick dimension — What could vary extremely?
  2. Test minimum — What if this was 1000x smaller/faster/fewer?
  3. Test maximum — What if this was 1000x bigger/slower/more?
  4. Note what breaks — Where do limits appear?
  5. Note what survives — What's fundamentally sound?

Examples

Example 1: Error Handling

Normal scale: "Handle errors when they occur" works fine At 1B scale: Error volume overwhelms logging, crashes system Reveals: Need to make errors impossible (type systems, contracts) or expect them (chaos engineering, circuit breakers)

Example 2: Synchronous APIs

Normal scale: Direct function calls work At global scale: Network latency makes synchronous calls unusable Reveals: Async/messaging becomes survival requirement, not optimization

Example 3: In-Memory State

Normal duration: Works for hours/days At years: Memory grows unbounded, eventual crash Reveals: Need persistence or periodic cleanup — cannot rely on process memory

Example 4: Single DB Write Path

Normal load: One writer, no contention At 10k concurrent writes: Deadlocks, lock contention, queue buildup Reveals: Need optimistic locking, write batching, or event sourcing

Red Flags You Need This

  • "It works in dev" (but will it work under production load?)
  • No idea where the limits are
  • "Should scale fine" (without testing or analysis)
  • Surprised by production behavior
  • First time this code will see real users

Remember

  • Extremes reveal fundamentals
  • What works at one scale often fails at another
  • Test both directions (bigger AND smaller)
  • Use insights to validate architecture early — cheaper to change now

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Build robust backend systems — APIs (REST, GraphQL, gRPC), authentication (OAuth 2.1, JWT), databases, performance optimization, security (OWASP Top 10), scalability patterns (microservices, caching, sharding), and testing. Use when designing APIs, implementing auth, optimizing queries, handling security vulnerabilities, building microservices, or developing production-ready backend systems.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026年10月19日 更新

caveman

免费

Terse output mode — strips filler/articles/hedging, ~75% token reduction. Activate whenever: context is filling up, user says be brief/terse/caveman/less tokens, or CAVEMAN_TRIGGERED appears in context. Persists every response until CAVEMAN_RELEASED or user says stop/normal mode.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026年10月19日 更新

Explore and debate solutions before writing code. Use when the user poses a design question, asks "how should I approach X", wants to think through options before committing, or says anything like "let's brainstorm", "what's the best way to...", "I'm not sure how to tackle this", or "should I use X or Y". Always runs before /ck:plan for novel or ambiguous features. No code is written — only: explore → clarify → spec → report.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026年10月19日 更新

ck-cook

免费

Implement a feature phase by phase from a phased JSON master or Markdown plan. Before each phase, confirm whether to create/run unit tests and whether to run ck:quality, unless explicit flags supply those choices. Supports token-budgeted execution, resumable state, and TDD handoff to ck:test.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026年10月19日 更新

ck-fix

免费

Fix a bug using Scout → Diagnose → Fix → Review → Finalize. Use when the user pastes an error message, stack trace, or test failure, or says "fix this bug", "something's broken", "tests are failing", "I'm getting an error". Also accepts `--from-quality <report>` or `--from-test <report>` to fix exactly the findings/failures a report lists. Modes (pick one): --fast (trivial errors — lint, type, build — skip scout and review), --hard (mandatory review, no auto-approve).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026年10月19日 更新

ck-plan

免费

Plan a feature or system before implementation. Use when the user says "plan this", "I want to build X", "how do I implement Y", or when /ck:brainstorm produces a spec.md. Always run before /ck:cook. Modes (pick one): --fast (simple, single-file), --hard (research + red-team + validate). Composable flag (combine with any mode): --tdd — propagates into the cook pipeline. Every phase gets Design Constraints and Quality/Testing State; ck:cook confirms optional test and quality checks per phase.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026年10月19日 更新

查看 DangQuangSE 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题