按类别或厂商查找并获取网络安全报告,比较威胁、勒索软件、数据泄露、云安全和AI趋势。分析会注明每项数据的厂商、年份及报告,并分别呈现来源间的分歧。
- 按类别查找威胁报告
- 获取指定厂商的报告
- 比较多家厂商的勒索软件趋势
按配置清单检查 GitHub 个人资料、博客、各类网站和社交平台简介,依据当前方针与名称找出过时内容、链接并准备更新方案,供确认后应用。
The principal brand integrity system: sweeps and refreshes brand/focus messaging across every public surface (GitHub profile README, blog, company site, marketing site, repo READMEs, LinkedIn/X/YouTube bios) to current focus, names, star counts, and flagship writing, from one surface inventory in USER config. USE WHEN brand update, update my brand, brand sweep, refresh my profiles, update my GitHub profile, github front page, profile README, my bios are stale, sync my messaging, update my ideas page, refresh the ideas page, ideas page on the blog. NOT FOR the content registry, writing blog posts, or social post copy.
实测评分 未实测
查看安装方法此技能会检查配置清单中登记的公开页面,包括 GitHub 个人资料 README、博客、公司或营销网站、仓库 README,以及 LinkedIn、X 和 YouTube 个人简介。它会从指定的信息来源读取当前的活动重点、名称、公开信息和代表性文章,找出过时的介绍和链接,并为每个页面准备更新方案。它也可以更新创意页面。实际执行更新后,会记录各页面的变更内容以及用于核对的依据。
当多个个人资料或网站上的介绍可能已经过时,或者需要统一名称和当前活动重点时,可以使用此技能。需要把近期想法补充到博客的创意页面时,也适用。
目标页面、更新方式和参考信息来源都需要登记在用户设置的 Surfaces.md 中。该文件缺失或内容不完整时,不会开始处理。更新公开内容前,会检查各页面的实际显示结果,并在获得用户批准后应用变更。
本介绍由 AI(OpenAI Codex)根据公开的 SKILL.md 撰写。准确的规格请查看下方原文。
AI 根据 SKILL.md 的内容检查了需要注意的操作和使用前提。评分只依据实际运行的结果(实测对比)。
不计入评分。 由 AI(OpenAI Codex)于 2026年10月28日 评估。仅供参考,安装前请同时查看原文。
安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
A person's brand is spread across a dozen public surfaces that drift out of sync: old project names, stale focus statements, dead links, outdated writing lists. This skill is the one place that knows every surface, how each one updates, and what "current" means, so a single BrandUpdate run brings them all back into line.
Source of truth for what the brand currently is: the files listed under ## Source-of-truth reads in Surfaces.md (focus and missions, what is live, bio facts) plus the freshest posts from the blog feed ($BLOG_FEED). Never duplicate those facts into this skill; read them at run time.
Surfaces.md stops the run at Check.ts with a pointer to Setup.md; no surface is ever swept from guesses.| Intent | Trigger | File |
|---|---|---|
| BrandUpdate | "brand update", "brand sweep", "update my GitHub profile", "refresh my bios/profiles" | Intents/BrandUpdate.md |
| UpdateIdeasPage | "update my ideas page", "refresh the ideas page", "parse my latest ideas" | Intents/UpdateIdeasPage.md |
| File | Read when |
|---|---|
Setup.md | first-time setup, or Check.ts exits non-zero |
Every personal fact (the public-surface inventory with URLs, repo paths, handles and update mechanisms; the ideas-page location and structure; the blog and feed facts $BLOG_URL, $BLOG_FEED, $BLOG_REPO; per-surface rules) lives in <configRoot>/LIFEOS/USER/CUSTOMIZATIONS/SKILLS/Brand/Surfaces.md (configRoot is $CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR when set, else ~/.claude). This skill body is generic.
Both intents start with bun ~/.claude/skills/Brand/Tools/Check.ts. It validates Surfaces.md and, when the file or a required section is missing, exits non-zero and points at the guide. First-time setup: Setup.md.
Surfaces.md ($BLOG_FEED). A blog's feed often lives somewhere other than the obvious paths (/feed.xml, /rss.xml, /atom.xml), so confirm the working one with curl before recording it.Example 1: Full brand sweep
User: "Run a brand update — everything feels stale"
→ BrandUpdate intent, full sweep
→ A drift table in the run ISA covers every inventory row; each fix went live only after the owner approved that surface
Example 2: Single surface
User: "Update my GitHub front page based on recent focus"
→ BrandUpdate intent, scoped to the GitHub profile surface
→ The README is pushed after approval of its GitHub render; every other surface is listed as unswept
Example 3: Ideas page
User: "Refresh the ideas page with my latest ideas"
→ UpdateIdeasPage intent
→ New principal-original ideas are on the live page, verified by screenshot after an approved deploy; rejected captures are listed with reasons
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
按类别或厂商查找并获取网络安全报告,比较威胁、勒索软件、数据泄露、云安全和AI趋势。分析会注明每项数据的厂商、年份及报告,并分别呈现来源间的分歧。
通过三轮分析,对比单个功能或组件的设计需求与整个系统的目标,梳理两者的冲突、合适的实现范围,以及方案是否符合整体方向。
按文章主题寻找格言或引文,按相关程度排序,并附上作者和推荐理由。可添加带出处的引文、按主题研究思想家的言论、整理使用记录,帮助避免重复引用。
按用途选择制作流程,生成博客插图、技术图解、比较图、漫画和图标等视觉内容,并输出供预览的图像。
依据简报和制作标准评估图片、影片、幻灯片及网站页面截图,由视觉评审给出评分和缺陷优先级,支持有限轮次的修改;通过评审后才能交付,并可记录人工评分供后续校准。
按主题、研究领域或论文编号查找 arXiv 论文,并整理标题、作者、摘要和链接;查看新投稿,也可在有内容时获取 AlphaXiv 的人工智能生成概述。