按类别或厂商查找并获取网络安全报告,比较威胁、勒索软件、数据泄露、云安全和AI趋势。分析会注明每项数据的厂商、年份及报告,并分别呈现来源间的分歧。
- 按类别查找威胁报告
- 获取指定厂商的报告
- 比较多家厂商的勒索软件趋势
将代码库、实体布置、比较、流程、时间线或数据集整理为控制台摘要和 HTML 页面,并标注事实来源,帮助读者直观了解整体结构与关系。
Visualizes anything at all and never declines — a codebase, a physical setup, a timeline, a process, finances, a comparison, a concept, a URL, a dataset — as a short console summary plus a designed HTML page, every fact labelled with where it came from (a file quote, a URL, the principal's words, or general knowledge). USE WHEN visualize, visualize this, visualize my <anything>, visualize <project>, show me this visually, draw it, map it, lay it out, how does X work, explain this architecture, map this system, system map, architecture map, what are the moving parts, draw my setup, show me my plan, walk me through this codebase, diagram this project or ISA. NOT FOR a standalone generated illustration or header image with no visualize ask (Art), rendering an ISA page (ISA), turning session output into an artifact (HTML), or hand-drawn sketches (Excalidraw).
实测评分 未实测
查看安装方法Visualize 可将代码库或项目整理成简洁的控制台图示和 HTML 页面,展示组成部分、主要流程及值得留意的问题。对于房间或设备等实体计划,它会按比例绘制俯视布局,并列出费用明细、订购内容和未决定事项。
对于想法、比较、数据集、时间线或流程,它会根据主题制作概念页面。页面上的事实会标注来源,例如文件和行号、网址、引文、计算结果或一般知识。尚未确认的内容也会注明未确认。
当你想一眼看清系统或项目各部分之间的关系,或希望把对话中比较过的选项整理成图示时,可以使用它。它也适合呈现设备或房间布局、采购计划、相关费用和待决定事项。
HTML 页面通常保存在对象附近。你可以要求只输出控制台内容,也可以指定保存位置。发布到分享服务时,对于不能运行脚本的环境,需要使用处理后的 HTML。
本介绍由 AI(OpenAI Codex)根据公开的 SKILL.md 撰写。准确的规格请查看下方原文。
AI 根据 SKILL.md 的内容检查了需要注意的操作和使用前提。评分只依据实际运行的结果(实测对比)。
不计入评分。 由 AI(OpenAI Codex)于 2026年10月28日 评估。仅供参考,安装前请同时查看原文。
安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Contents: Ideal State · Intent Routing · Data & Config · Split of work · Gotchas · Examples
Points at a project, repo, directory or ISA and leaves the principal understanding how it works: a concise ASCII map in the console and a designed HTML explanation saved next to the code. The purpose is that nothing runs in production that nobody understands.
Points at a physical plan (a gear setup, a rig, a room, a purchase list) and leaves the principal seeing it: a to-scale top-down drawing with the cost split, the full order and the open decisions, every fact quoted from the plan document.
Anything else (an idea, a comparison, a dataset, a timeline, a process) becomes one hand-built concept page with a short console summary. The skill never declines.
file or file:line, a verbatim plan quote, a URL, computed, the principal's words or general knowledge), and anything unconfirmed is labelled as such rather than stated.| Intent | Trigger | File |
|---|---|---|
| Visualize | "visualize" on code, "how does X work", "map this system", "explain this architecture" | Intents/Visualize.md |
| Plan | "visualize" on a physical thing: "visualize my drum/studio/desk plan", "lay out my setup", "draw my rig", "show me my order" | Intents/Plan.md |
| Concept | "visualize" on anything that is neither code nor a physical plan: an idea, a scientific question, a comparison, a dataset, a timeline, a process | Intents/Concept.md |
| File | Read when |
|---|---|
Setup.md | first-time setup: the optional PREFERENCES.md keys and where saved plans live |
User customizations live at <configRoot>/LIFEOS/USER/CUSTOMIZATIONS/SKILLS/Visualize/ (configRoot is $CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR when set, else ~/.claude). When it exists, its PREFERENCES.md, configurations and resources override the defaults here, and plan models live under its Plans/; when absent, the defaults stand. PREFERENCES.md keys: ## Concept pages → Ground: (the page ground Concept uses; default is whatever suits the subject). Setup: Setup.md.
The model reads the target and writes one typed system-model JSON. Tools/Visualize.ts owns everything after that: it refuses models whose citations do not resolve, prints the ASCII, lays out the SVG, and writes the page. The model never hand-writes ASCII art or HTML, which keeps every map consistent and the grounding check in code.
bun ~/.claude/skills/Visualize/Tools/Visualize.ts --schema prints the model shape with an example.Tools/VisualizePlan.ts with the same flags and the same split: the model writes a plan-model JSON (--schema shows it), and the tool checks every { file, quote } against the plan document before drawing the page.Tools/Bake.ts owns the mechanical parts: --check parses every inline script before any screenshot, and a bake writes a script-free copy for hosts that block scripts.file://.Flags shared by both renderers (--check validates without writing):
| User says | Flag | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| (default) | — | Console output + page in the --root directory |
| "just show me", "console only", "no HTML" | --no-html | Console output only |
| "put it in Downloads", "save it to X" | --out-dir <dir> | Page lands in that directory instead |
| "wider", "narrow terminal" | --width <n> | Console width (default 100) |
Content-Security-Policy: sandbox, which blocks every script, and their preview page shows HTML as source. A scripted page uploaded raw renders blank; upload the baked copy and give the raw link. (2026-10-06) The same sandbox blocks new tabs, so a target="_blank" link does nothing on a plain click; Bake.ts strips those targets, so link rows only work in the baked copy. (2026-10-12)Example 1: A half-forgotten service
User: "visualize the monitoring layer"
→ Visualize intent
→ A console map naming its parts, main flow and top risk, and <dir>/Visualize-<slug>-<timestamp>.html where every part, link and risk cites its file
Example 2: From an ISA
User: "/visualize path/to/project/ISA.md"
→ Visualize intent
→ The ISA supplies intent and names, every component is grounded in the code the ISA points at, and the page lands next to the ISA
Example 3: A gear plan
User: "visualize my drum kit plan"
→ Plan intent
→ A to-scale top-down drawing with the cost split, the full order and the open decisions, every fact quoted from the order sheet; a cost that misses the stated total is flagged first
Example 4: A comparison from the conversation
User: "visualize the three options we just compared"
→ Concept intent
→ One designed page whose main figure draws the comparison, every fact source-tagged, and a console line naming the one non-obvious difference
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
按类别或厂商查找并获取网络安全报告,比较威胁、勒索软件、数据泄露、云安全和AI趋势。分析会注明每项数据的厂商、年份及报告,并分别呈现来源间的分歧。
通过三轮分析,对比单个功能或组件的设计需求与整个系统的目标,梳理两者的冲突、合适的实现范围,以及方案是否符合整体方向。
按文章主题寻找格言或引文,按相关程度排序,并附上作者和推荐理由。可添加带出处的引文、按主题研究思想家的言论、整理使用记录,帮助避免重复引用。
按用途选择制作流程,生成博客插图、技术图解、比较图、漫画和图标等视觉内容,并输出供预览的图像。
依据简报和制作标准评估图片、影片、幻灯片及网站页面截图,由视觉评审给出评分和缺陷优先级,支持有限轮次的修改;通过评审后才能交付,并可记录人工评分供后续校准。
按主题、研究领域或论文编号查找 arXiv 论文,并整理标题、作者、摘要和链接;查看新投稿,也可在有内容时获取 AlphaXiv 的人工智能生成概述。