跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

guided-goal

Shape a vague request for autonomous work into a bounded completion contract with clear success criteria, verification, scope, and a numeric attempt limit. After the user explicitly confirms the contract, carry out the work and report the evidence checked.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Turn a rough objective into a bounded, verifiable completion contract, confirm it, then execute it with a finite attempt cap. Use when the user wants autonomous work but the outcome, proof, scope, or stopping point is still vague.

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Defining success and stopping conditions for autonomous work
  • Clarifying what evidence will prove a task is complete
  • Setting scope and an attempt limit before execution

包含的文件(4)

  • SKILL.md4.4 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml317 B
  • LICENSE1.0 KB
  • references/host-invocation.md1.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Guided Goal

Convert rough intent into a completion contract before doing the work. The interview and execution are separate phases.

Phase 1 — Interview without acting

During the interview:

  • Ask exactly one short question per response.
  • Do not inspect files, search, delegate, run commands, edit anything, or call tools.
  • Ask at most six questions. Ask fewer when the answer is already known.
  • Ask for the highest-value missing field, not every possible detail.
  • Preserve concrete facts and constraints already supplied. Never make the user repeat them.
  • Use relevant project, stack, environment, and verification facts already present in conversation context.
  • Do not turn the goal into a planning exercise unless planning is the requested outcome.
  • Push back on subjective success, self-evaluated quality, unbounded iteration, missing verification, vague boundaries, or absent stop conditions.
  • If the user cancels, stop without activating or executing anything.

Before activation, establish all of these:

  1. one bounded objective;
  2. binary or deterministic success criteria;
  3. exact commands, checks, artifacts, or observable evidence that prove completion;
  4. allowed scope and an explicit denylist;
  5. a numeric attempt cap from 1 to 100 plus escalation or hard-stop conditions.

When ready, present exactly this structure:

Objective

<one bounded objective>

Success criteria

<binary or deterministic criteria>

Verification

<exact commands, checks, artifacts, or observable evidence>

Boundaries

<allowed scope and explicit denylist>

Stop conditions

<explicit numeric attempt cap plus escalation or hard-stop conditions>

Then ask exactly one question: Activate this goal?

Phase 2 — Require explicit confirmation

Do not activate from silence, ambiguity, or a general acknowledgment. Accept only an explicit confirmation that clearly refers to the presented contract.

If the user changes the objective, criteria, verification, boundaries, or stop conditions, present the revised full contract and ask Activate this goal? again. A confirmation for an older contract does not authorize the revised one.

Phase 3 — Activate through the available host

After explicit confirmation, use the first applicable mode:

Hermes native mode

If the host exposes guided_goal_activate, call it with the complete five-section Markdown contract in its objective argument. If the tool is deferred, load its schema through the host's normal deferred-tool mechanism first. After successful activation, begin working immediately. Do not ask for confirmation again.

Portable in-session mode

If no native activation tool exists:

  1. State that the contract is activated for the current session. Do not claim it is persisted, backgrounded, or enforced by a native goal judge.
  2. Execute the contract immediately using the host's normal tools and approval system. Do not substitute a similarly named planning or goal-recording tool such as create_goal; only guided_goal_activate qualifies as the native activation path for this skill.
  3. Count one attempt as one meaningful change-or-investigation cycle followed by the contract's verification, not as each individual tool call.
  4. After each failed attempt, use the evidence to choose a materially different next attempt. Do not repeat the same failed action unchanged.
  5. Stop as soon as every success criterion passes its stated verification.
  6. Stop and report the exact blocker when the attempt cap is reached, a denylisted action becomes necessary, required authorization is unavailable, or another hard-stop condition fires.
  7. Never broaden scope silently. A material scope change requires a revised contract and fresh confirmation.

Use a native task list or status surface when available, but do not make one a prerequisite. If the session must end before completion, return the full contract, attempt count, verified evidence, current blocker, and next executable action as a resumable handoff.

Completion report

A completion claim must name the verification actually run and its result. A timeout, skipped check, plausible-looking output, or agent self-assessment is not a pass.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Handle ActiveCampaign contact and marketing tasks through Rube MCP, a connection for agent tools. Find or create contacts, manage tags and subscriptions, enroll contacts in existing automated workflows, and create follow-up tasks.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Finding or registering contacts
  • Adding or removing contact tags
  • Subscribing contacts to lists or unsubscribing them
davepoon/buildwithclaude36752026年10月25日 更新

Research competitors’ live Meta and Google ads to identify opening hooks, offers, calls to action, and landing pages. Receive a sourced creative brief and up to three test ideas adapted to your product.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Find angles for new ad copy
  • Plan creative tests using competitor ads
  • Choose a landing page message
davepoon/buildwithclaude36752026年10月25日 更新

Add website or app tracking, then use command-line tools to review traffic, signups, drop-off, and returning users across projects. Run A/B tests, which compare alternative headlines or buttons, and inspect results to guide changes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding page-view and key-action tracking
  • Reviewing traffic and referral sources across projects
  • Finding where visitors drop out before signup or purchase
davepoon/buildwithclaude36752026年10月25日 更新

Establish rules for when an AI agent should recall past context and save lasting decisions, corrections, preferences, and failures. Works with Markdown files or memory services, preserving decision history and surfacing conflicting records.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Carry project conventions into the next session
  • Save user corrections and lasting preferences
  • Record failed approaches and their causes
davepoon/buildwithclaude36752026年10月25日 更新

Audit local AI coding-agent sessions with agenttrace to identify spending, token use, tool failures, and operational problems. Produce readable or structured reports and define pass-or-fail thresholds for automated continuous integration checks.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Investigating session costs and token waste
  • Finding repeated tool failures and retries
  • Exporting session reports as Markdown or JSON
davepoon/buildwithclaude36752026年10月25日 更新

Audit saved agent sessions for access to private files and evidence that secret values entered an agent's context. Get findings without displaying secrets, identify keys needing rotation, and inspect Claude Code or Codex sessions in a local report.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Check whether an agent accessed .env files
  • Identify keys that may need rotation
  • Audit private-file access by subagents
davepoon/buildwithclaude36752026年10月25日 更新

查看 davepoon 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题