跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开中文介绍

merge-prs

根据已审核的合并请求计划,完成获准的修改与验证,保留贡献者的作者信息,并且只合并所有者明确授权的请求组,以证据说明合并结果和暂缓原因。

原文查看原文说明

Consume analyzed PR plans, implement authorized fixes with contributor credit, validate exact candidates, and merge only owner-selected and explicitly authorized groups through the shared gates. Requires prior review evidence; unknown or failing required checks remain HOLD.

AI 评分90分/ 100查看安装方法

适用场景

  • 完成已审核请求中获准的修改
  • 验证后合并选定的请求组
  • 修改时保留贡献者的作者信息
  • 附证据报告合并结果与暂缓原因

中文介绍

功能

接收已审核的合并请求(PR,即提议将代码更改纳入项目的请求)计划,推进获准的修改、验证、合并及结果确认。整理拟纳入的更改、依赖关系、风险、回退方法与合并顺序,只处理所有者选定并明确授权的请求组。修改时保留原作者信息,并核对针对实际合并候选内容的验证结果。

适用场景

适合需要集中整理多个合并请求、完成必要修改后再按顺序合并的维护者。在尊重其他工作会话的负责范围及提交者更改的同时,分别报告已合并、已准备、暂缓和验证失败的项目,并提供相应证据。

使用示例

  • “检查已审核的计划,整理合并候选项和必须完成的修改。”
  • “对我批准的请求组进行修改和验证,合并满足条件的项目。”

注意事项

需要事先的审核记录,以及所引用的共享验证与合并规则。允许继续开发的一般授权不等于合并授权。必要检查结果未知或失败的项目须暂缓处理,不得省略必要的实际环境验证或凭据。关闭或延期处理合并请求,需要逐项获得单独批准。

本介绍由 AI(OpenAI Codex)根据公开的 SKILL.md 撰写。准确的规格请查看下方原文。

客观评估

AI 仅根据 SKILL.md 的内容,从 4 个方面进行了评估。星标数和热度不计入评估。

指令清晰度能否看出何时使用、做什么
A良好明确说明从已审核计划出发,完成获准修改、验证、合并和结果确认。
步骤具体性步骤、输入输出和示例是否具体
A良好规定了选择、修改、验证和结果核对步骤,以及包含数量与确切证据的最终报告。
安全性发送数据、删除文件、执行命令等是否有说明
A良好合并须经所有者明确授权并通过必要验证,关闭或延期也须逐项单独批准。
安装难易度所需工具和 API 密钥是否少且有说明
B部分不足要求事先审核和共享规则文件,但未说明所需运行环境及凭据的准备步骤。

总分按每项 A=25 分、B=15 分、C=5 分相加。 由 AI(OpenAI Codex)于 2026年10月21日 评估。仅供参考,安装前请同时查看原文。

如果您认为评估有误,请申请复核

请写明哪一项有误以及原因。无需登录。我们会对照 SKILL.md 重新评估,并在此处更新结果。

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md4.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Execute analyzed PR plans

Read ../_shared/base-green.md, ../_shared/validation-gate.md, ../_shared/merge-gates.md, ../_shared/protected-surfaces.md and ../_shared/credit-preservation.md before execution. Their authority and evidence boundaries apply throughout; no throughput exception waives required checks.

1. Reconcile and choose

Refresh live PR states/heads/bases, worktree ownership, freeze state and existing plans under _tasks/pipeline/prs/1-analyzed/. Preserve other sessions' claims. No plan means return to review; an explicit owner request for inline review may authorize a bounded mini-analysis, not skip validation or merge authorization.

Present the organization report by readiness and contributor/theme, including review rating, scope, risks, mandatory fixes and recommendation. Sound ideas that need substantial work may be offered for uplift; do not dispatch it without the owner's choice. The owner selects the items/groups, then receives a merge dossier: what enters, leaves or changes; authorship; dependencies; validation; risks; rollback; order and final candidate identity. Obtain explicit authorization for that group. General permission to continue development is not merge permission. An explicit owner instruction naming PRs and requesting their merge can satisfy the selection/dossier decision; record the scope, but retain all safety gates.

Claim only selected eligible plans via the pipeline's atomic move into 2-implementing/; if another session wins, stop that item. Stage owned paths only in the separate private _tasks repo and regenerate its index when appropriate. Merged items go to 3-done/ with actual evidence; closed/unmerged items are not reported as delivered. Age alone does not establish that a claim is abandoned.

2. Repair without losing credit

Create an isolated worktree at the observed contributor head. Verify identity before changing anything and recheck the remote predecessor before every push. Implement only the approved mandatory items, with RED-to-GREEN proof and affected suites. Preserve original authorship and appropriate maintainer co-authorship. Do not stash, reset a contributor branch, overwrite unrelated edits or force-push over concurrent work. Reconstruct only in a separate recovery branch after owner review; locked forks follow the credit-preservation protocol and stay open.

Use fragments-first changelog entries where supported. During synchronization, verify sibling entries remain intact; do not overwrite the complete changelog. Live validation or credentials that are genuinely required remain an explicit HOLD, with a durable release-drain record; they are not optional because CI passed.

3. Validate and admit

Use the exact-candidate contract from the shared validation/merge rules. Local fast checks, head-only pre_greened stamps, a previous day's full train, an empty incident list, or DRIFT alone never grant admission. Do not run a fallback command after a failed gate to manufacture success. Missing/contradictory artifacts and incomplete build/package evidence remain failures or HOLD.

Base failures require exact-base reproduction and repair in their own PR; they do not justify an administrative bypass. Fork action_required requires a reviewed trust decision for the exact head/workflow and explicit approval authority. Never auto-approve every pushed fork run. A cancelled/slow check is not automatically flaky or infrastructure-related; establish the cause from evidence.

When the owner has authorized the group and all required checks pass, merge only through ../_shared/merge-gates.md, serialized. Immediately recheck freeze, PR head, base, candidate and protected surfaces. Any movement or retarget invalidates the receipt. A full train tip cannot authorize different intermediate squash trees. Skip held items without silently expanding the approved batch.

4. Reconcile the outcome

Read back actual merged state/SHA and credit, refresh the base, retain artifacts and update only owned private plans. Track the post-merge base validation separately. Do not mark prepared/draft PRs or unmerged patches complete.

Closing/defer/subsumed dispositions need separate explicit per-item owner approval. Prove supersession by affected behavior and direction, not an issue-number match. Keep reporter/contributor credit and explain the precise scope in any authorized public response. Do not close a PR merely because its code was cherry-picked.

End with counts of merged, prepared, held and still-failing items plus exact evidence. Teardown only owned clean backed-up worktrees under the shared teardown protocol. Preserve the shared checkout and do not update memory without a request.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

cli-a2a

免费有简介AI 评分 90分

通过命令行向OmniRoute的A2A服务器发送任务,查看执行历史和日志,监控或取消任务,并交互测试智能体之间的通信。

  • 检查服务器状态和可用技能
  • 使用JSON输入调用技能
  • 查看任务执行历史和日志
diegosouzapw/OmniRoute7.9万2026年10月20日 更新

cli-backup-sync

免费有简介AI 评分 70分

通过命令行备份和恢复OmniRoute数据,管理定期保存、加密与云端同步,并在同步前检查差异,执行数据导出和导入。

  • 恢复前创建备份
  • 设置定期备份
  • 云端同步前检查差异
diegosouzapw/OmniRoute7.9万2026年10月20日 更新

Submit groups of AI requests as batch jobs with the OmniRoute command line. Manage input files, monitor or cancel jobs, save results and errors, and incorporate batch processing into automated build and deployment workflows.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Submitting AI requests from a JSONL file
  • Monitoring batch jobs and waiting for completion
  • Saving batch results and error details
diegosouzapw/OmniRoute7.9万2026年10月20日 更新

cli-chat

免费有简介AI 评分 90分

从终端向LLM提问,逐步显示回答或进行交互对话。支持从文件或标准输入读取提示词、选择模型和指定系统提示词。

  • 在终端向AI提问
  • 使用文件内容作为输入
  • 逐步显示回答并保存到文件
diegosouzapw/OmniRoute7.9万2026年10月20日 更新

cli-compression

免费有简介AI 评分 80分

通过命令行管理缩短提示词的压缩设置,调整RTK过滤器、Caveman规则及多种方式的组合,并用实际输入预览结果。

  • 用实际输入查看压缩结果
  • 调整RTK和Caveman规则
  • 比较多种压缩方式
diegosouzapw/OmniRoute7.9万2026年10月20日 更新

cli-contexts

免费有简介AI 评分 80分

通过命令行调整传给AI的信息处理设置和RTK过滤器,切换OmniRoute连接,以JSON导入导出配置,并查看或使会话失效。

  • 调整令牌预算和过滤器
  • 切换已保存的服务器连接
  • 以JSON导入导出连接配置
diegosouzapw/OmniRoute7.9万2026年10月20日 更新

查看 diegosouzapw 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题