跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

hermes-python-script-wrapper-for-shell-cron

Diagnose and safely document Hermes cron script interpreter mismatches, especially when shell scripts are executed as Python or Python wrappers are executed as shell.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md4.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Hermes Python Wrapper for Shell Cron

Purpose

Provide a safe workflow for diagnosing Hermes cron script= interpreter mismatches. The common failure modes are shell syntax being interpreted by Python, or Python code being interpreted by shell. The default workflow only diagnoses and proposes a wrapper plan; writing wrapper files requires user approval.

When to use

  • A Hermes cron job fails with syntax errors around shell constructs such as strict mode, heredocs, or bash conditionals.
  • A cron job fails with shell errors while the entry file contains Python code.
  • The job's configured script extension does not match the interpreter used by the scheduler.
  • A user wants a stable wrapper pattern for cron scripts while keeping the existing script path.

Safety rules

  • Default workflow is read-only.
  • Do not edit scripts, change permissions, trigger jobs, or update cron definitions without explicit approval.
  • Do not copy production scripts into public documentation.
  • Replace real paths with <PROJECT_ROOT>, <SCRIPT_PATH>, <WRAPPER_PATH>, or <IMPLEMENTATION_SCRIPT>.
  • Do not expose script contents if they include credentials, private URLs, tokens, or production data.

Read-only workflow

  1. Identify the failing Hermes cron job and script path from metadata or user-provided error context.
  2. Read the error summary and classify the mismatch:
    • shell syntax reported by Python means the entry is being executed as Python;
    • Python syntax reported by shell means the entry is being executed as shell.
  3. Inspect cron metadata to determine how the scheduler invokes script= for that job.
  4. Inspect only the minimum safe lines of the entry script needed to identify its language and shebang.
  5. Compare the entry script language, extension, shebang, and scheduler invocation mode.
  6. Produce a wrapper plan using placeholders, without writing files.
  7. Include a verification plan that compares direct implementation execution with scheduler-style entry execution.

Evidence to collect

  • Redacted job name or identifier.
  • Configured script path as <SCRIPT_PATH>.
  • Error class and first safe error line.
  • Detected script language: shell, Python, or mixed.
  • Scheduler invocation mode if known.
  • Whether arguments need to be forwarded.
  • Whether stdout/stderr and exit code must be preserved.

Stop conditions

  • The script contains secrets or production-specific data that cannot be safely summarized.
  • The scheduler invocation mode is unknown and cannot be inferred read-only.
  • Fixing requires editing the script, chmod, cron update, or a manual job run without approval.
  • The proposed wrapper might alter stdout/stderr or exit-code semantics.

Optional user-approved actions

Only after explicit user approval:

  • Move implementation content to <IMPLEMENTATION_SCRIPT>.
  • Replace the original entry with a wrapper appropriate for the real invocation mode.
  • Set execute permissions.
  • Run syntax checks and controlled dry-runs.
  • Trigger or run the cron job once to verify recovery.

Generic wrapper patterns

Use these only as templates after approval.

Python entry that delegates to shell:

#!/usr/bin/env python3
import subprocess
import sys

SCRIPT = "<IMPLEMENTATION_SCRIPT>"
result = subprocess.run(["/usr/bin/env", "bash", SCRIPT] + sys.argv[1:])
raise SystemExit(result.returncode)

Shell entry that delegates to shell implementation:

#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail
SCRIPT="<IMPLEMENTATION_SCRIPT>"
exec /usr/bin/env bash "$SCRIPT" "$@"

Final report format

Summary: <interpreter mismatch diagnosis>
Job: <redacted job name/id>
Script: <SCRIPT_PATH>
Observed error: <safe summarized error>
Detected mismatch: <shell-as-python / python-as-shell / unknown>
Read-only evidence: <bullets>
Wrapper plan: <high-level plan with placeholders>
Verification plan: <syntax/direct/scheduler-style checks>
Needs approval before changes: yes

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Route CEO-first multi-window work into owner-led role loops. Use for 总控/CEO、架构/CTO、内容主编、角色派发与复用、模型路由、来源窗口回调、role-windows 台账、skill 命中统计或 multi-window loop engineering。

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Dirtytrii/codex-skills112026年10月9日 更新

Read-only first workflow for diagnosing application incidents by collecting service, log, network, configuration, and functional evidence before proposing any fix.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Dirtytrii/codex-skills112026年10月9日 更新

Run user-authorized black-box web security tests and evidence-based reports. Use for 黑盒安全测试、渗透测试、数据泄露、未授权访问、公开 JS/API、登录爆破防护、CORS 或安全响应头检查。

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Dirtytrii/codex-skills112026年10月9日 更新

Choose the narrowest reliable browser surface across Codex Browser, signed-in Chrome, Playwright CLI, and platform scripts. Use for browser automation, logged-in workflows, UI inspection, screenshots, form filling, publish previews, or frontend QA.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Dirtytrii/codex-skills112026年10月9日 更新

提议并执行 rubric 或 bucket 升级。两种模式:**完整 rubric bump**(最高风险动作,5 步强制 + 跨模型审核)和 **--bucket-only 轻量重校**(只换 bucket 边界,不动 rubric 公式)。**Phase 2 强制走 cheat-score-blind sub-agent 给校准池重打分**——不接受 self-scored fallback。触发词:"升级 rubric"/"bump rubric"/"更新公式"/"我想加一个维度"/"调整权重"/"重校桶"/"recalibrate bucket"。

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Dirtytrii/codex-skills112026年10月9日 更新

初始化 cheat-on-content 内容校准工作区。仅在用户明确开始该工作流,或其子 skill 确认缺少 .cheat-state.json 时使用;不响应一般项目初始化、安装诊断或 Codex 首次会话。

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Dirtytrii/codex-skills112026年10月9日 更新

查看 Dirtytrii 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题