跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

adopt

Audit an existing project's design documents and supporting files to check whether their formats work with the template's skills. Get a numbered migration plan that prioritizes gaps and required changes, rather than simply listing what exists.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Brownfield audit — do existing artifacts actually work? Numbered migration plan. Unlike /project-stage-detect, checks compliance not existence.

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Checking existing documents before adopting a project template
  • Auditing game design documents or architecture decision records
  • Prioritizing gaps in project tracking and configuration files
  • Planning migration steps without rewriting existing content

包含的文件(8)

  • SKILL.md4.8 KB
  • references/1-detect.md2.1 KB
  • references/2-format-audit.md9.8 KB
  • references/3-classify.md1.3 KB
  • references/4-migration-plan.md2.7 KB
  • references/5-summary.md1.8 KB
  • references/6-write.md3.4 KB
  • references/7-first-action.md2.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

!bash "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../hooks/yaml-helper.sh" resolve_config --keys review_mode,automation,automation_always_ask,workflow

Resolved above — use as-is. /adopt also inspects project.yaml and the legacy config files directly when reporting and writing migration state; that raw inspection is deliberate and separate from the resolved values above.

Adopt — Brownfield Template Adoption

This skill audits an existing project's artifacts for format compliance with the template's skill pipeline, then produces a prioritised migration plan.

This is not /project-stage-detect. /project-stage-detect answers: what exists? /adopt answers: will what exists actually work with the template's skills?

A project can have GDDs, ADRs, and stories — and every format-sensitive skill will still fail silently or produce wrong results if those artifacts are in the wrong internal format.

Output: docs/adoption-plan-[date].md — a persistent, checkable migration plan.

Argument modes:

Audit mode: $ARGUMENTS (blank = full)

  • No argument / full: Complete audit — all artifact types
  • gdds: GDD format compliance only
  • adrs: ADR format compliance only
  • stories: Story format compliance only
  • infra: Infrastructure artifact gaps only (registry, manifest, sprint-status, stage.txt)

Automation mode: Resolve modes.automation (project.local.yaml → project.yaml → default collaborative). Every AskUserQuestion call follows .claude/docs/automation-modes.md (collaborative asks always · guided major-only · autonomous logs and proceeds; automation_always_ask categories always prompt).

workflow (per .claude/docs/workflow-modes.md). It scopes the Phase 2 audit and Phase 3 severity: full audits all doc types at full structure; standard audits only the required docs/sections (optional sections are informational, not gaps); minimal is a design/game-brief.md format check — GDDs/ADRs/UX are not expected. See Phase 2.

Phase 1: Detect Project State

Read references/1-detect.md now and follow it — this phase's steps are in that file, not here. Read it again if the conversation was compacted or resumed during this phase.

Phase 2: Format Audit

Read references/2-format-audit.md now and follow it — this phase's steps are in that file, not here. Read it again if the conversation was compacted or resumed during this phase.

Phase 3: Classify and Prioritise Gaps

Read references/3-classify.md now and follow it — this phase's steps are in that file, not here. Read it again if the conversation was compacted or resumed during this phase.

Phase 4: Build the Migration Plan

Read references/4-migration-plan.md now and follow it — this phase's steps are in that file, not here. Read it again if the conversation was compacted or resumed during this phase.

Phase 5: Present Summary and Ask to Write

Read references/5-summary.md now and follow it — this phase's steps are in that file, not here. Read it again if the conversation was compacted or resumed during this phase.

Phase 6: Write the Adoption Plan

Read references/6-write.md now and follow it — this phase's steps are in that file, not here. Read it again if the conversation was compacted or resumed during this phase.

Phase 7: Offer First Action

Read references/7-first-action.md now and follow it — this phase's steps are in that file, not here. Read it again if the conversation was compacted or resumed during this phase.

Collaborative Protocol

Applies in collaborative mode (the default). For guided and autonomous modes, see .claude/docs/automation-modes.md — the rules below describe what collaborative mode requires, not universal behavior.

  1. Read silently — complete the full audit before presenting anything
  2. Show the summary first — let the user see scope before asking to write
  3. Ask before writing — always confirm before creating the adoption plan file
  4. Offer, don't force — the plan is advisory; the user decides what to fix and when
  5. One action at a time — after handing off the plan, offer one specific next step, not a list of six things to do simultaneously
  6. Never regenerate existing artifacts — only fill gaps in what exists; do not rewrite GDDs, ADRs, or stories that already have content

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Document a technical decision in an architecture decision record, or ADR. Capture its context, alternatives, and consequences, assign a record number, and distinguish a proposed decision from an accepted one so dependent work reflects its actual status.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Recording the reasons behind a technical choice
  • Documenting alternatives and consequences of a design decision
  • Creating numbered records alongside existing architecture decisions
Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios2.7万2026年10月8日 更新

Review whether game design requirements are covered by documented architecture decisions. Identify missing coverage, conflicting decisions, and engine compatibility concerns, with an optional matrix linking requirements to development stories and tests.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Find game requirements without architecture decisions
  • Check for conflicts between architecture decisions
  • Review compatibility with the pinned engine version
Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios2.7万2026年10月8日 更新

art-bible

免费

Create a game's art direction document, defining its visual rules, mood, shapes, colors, and production standards. Review and approve sections individually, with guidance that connects character, environment, and interface design to the game's concept and technical constraints.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Defining a game's core visual identity before asset production
  • Documenting character, environment, and interface design rules
  • Aligning asset standards with engine and performance limits
Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios2.7万2026年10月8日 更新

Audit game asset files for naming rules, size limits, formats, and broken references. Receive a report of measured violations and suggested fixes, with clear explanations of checks that lack data or cannot be assessed for the engine.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking image and audio naming conventions
  • Finding files that exceed asset size limits
  • Investigating missing references and potentially unused assets
Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios2.7万2026年10月8日 更新

Turn game design documents and character profiles into asset specifications and image generation prompts. Define appearance, dimensions, file formats, and naming rules, then maintain an asset list that tracks progress and identifies shared assets.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • List the visual assets needed for a game
  • Define consistent character and environment asset specifications
  • Prepare image generation prompts from an art direction guide
Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios2.7万2026年10月8日 更新

Review game data and formulas for combat, economy, progression, or loot. Compare values with documented targets, identify dominant strategies and broken resource loops, and produce prioritized adjustment recommendations while clearly marking areas that lack enough data.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Comparing weapon damage and combat effectiveness
  • Finding resource loops and pricing problems
  • Reviewing experience and power progression
Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios2.7万2026年10月8日 更新

查看 Donchitos 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题