分析项目代码、配置、文档和基础设施文件,生成可交互探索的结构与依赖关系图。支持日语说明、文件排除,以及根据变更更新已有分析结果。
- 了解首次接触的项目结构
- 检查组成部分之间的依赖
- 用日语生成设计说明
从代码中提取业务领域、业务流程和具体步骤,生成可交互的横向流程图。既可利用现有知识图谱,也可通过轻量扫描收集分析材料。
Extract business domain knowledge from a codebase and generate an interactive domain flow graph. Works standalone (lightweight scan) or derives from an existing /understand knowledge graph.
understand-domain 从代码中提取业务领域、业务流程和各个步骤,在仪表板中生成可交互的横向流程图。如果已有知识图谱,它会根据其中的组成部分和关系归纳业务知识;如果没有,则轻量扫描文件结构、处理入口和部分代码,收集分析所需的材料。
适合了解项目实际实现的业务流程,或从业务角度整理代码结构。可以在图中查看业务领域与具体步骤之间的联系,也可以换一个角度重新理解现有知识图谱。
/understand-domain --full,重新扫描。”需要相关插件和分析代理,轻量扫描使用 Python。即使已有图谱,--full 也会重新扫描。结果保存到 domain-graph.json,并启动 /understand-dashboard。在 Git worktree 中,默认将输出位置切换到主仓库。如果现有图谱尚未反映某些变更,会发出警告。
本介绍由 AI(OpenAI Codex)根据公开的 SKILL.md 撰写。准确的规格请查看下方原文。
AI 仅根据 SKILL.md 的内容,从 4 个方面进行了评估。星标数和热度不计入评估。
总分按每项 A=25 分、B=15 分、C=5 分相加。 由 AI(OpenAI Codex)于 2026年10月21日 评估。仅供参考,安装前请同时查看原文。
安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Extracts business domain knowledge — domains, business flows, and process steps — from a codebase and produces an interactive horizontal flow graph in the dashboard.
.ua/knowledge-graph.json, or the legacy .understand-anything/knowledge-graph.json when that directory is present), derives domain knowledge from it (cheap, no file scanning)--full flag to force a fresh scan even if a knowledge graph existsPROJECT_ROOTSet PROJECT_ROOT to the current working directory.
Worktree redirect. If PROJECT_ROOT is inside a git worktree (not the main checkout), redirect output to the main repository root. Worktrees managed by Claude Code are ephemeral — the data directory (.ua/, or legacy .understand-anything/) written there is destroyed when the session ends, taking the domain graph with it (issue #133). Detect a worktree by comparing git rev-parse --git-dir against git rev-parse --git-common-dir; in a normal checkout or submodule they resolve to the same path, in a worktree they differ and the parent of --git-common-dir is the main repo root.
COMMON_DIR=$(git -C "$PROJECT_ROOT" rev-parse --git-common-dir 2>/dev/null)
GIT_DIR=$(git -C "$PROJECT_ROOT" rev-parse --git-dir 2>/dev/null)
if [ -n "$COMMON_DIR" ] && [ -n "$GIT_DIR" ]; then
COMMON_ABS=$(cd "$PROJECT_ROOT" && cd "$COMMON_DIR" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
GIT_ABS=$(cd "$PROJECT_ROOT" && cd "$GIT_DIR" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
if [ -n "$COMMON_ABS" ] && [ "$COMMON_ABS" != "$GIT_ABS" ]; then
MAIN_ROOT=$(dirname "$COMMON_ABS")
if [ -d "$MAIN_ROOT" ] && [ "${UNDERSTAND_NO_WORKTREE_REDIRECT:-0}" != "1" ]; then
echo "[understand-domain] Detected git worktree at $PROJECT_ROOT"
echo "[understand-domain] Redirecting output to main repo root: $MAIN_ROOT"
echo "[understand-domain] (Set UNDERSTAND_NO_WORKTREE_REDIRECT=1 to keep PROJECT_ROOT as the worktree.)"
PROJECT_ROOT="$MAIN_ROOT"
fi
fi
fi
Use $PROJECT_ROOT (not the bare CWD) for every reference to "the current project" / <project-root> in subsequent phases.
Resolve the data directory $UA_DIR. All Understand-Anything artifacts live in the project's data directory. Resolve it once, now that $PROJECT_ROOT is known, and reuse $UA_DIR for every read and write in later phases:
UA_DIR="$PROJECT_ROOT/$([ -d "$PROJECT_ROOT/.understand-anything" ] && echo .understand-anything || echo .ua)"
This keeps the legacy .understand-anything/ directory when it already exists (existing projects keep working with no migration) and uses the new .ua/ otherwise. Because each phase may run in a fresh shell, carry $UA_DIR forward like $PROJECT_ROOT, re-resolving it with the line above if a later command block needs it.
Important: do not assume the plugin root is simply two directories above the skill path string. In many installations ~/.agents/skills/understand-domain is a symlink into the real plugin checkout. Prefer runtime-provided plugin roots first (for Claude), then fall back to universal symlinks, skill symlink resolution, and common clone-based install paths.
Resolve the plugin root like this:
SKILL_REAL=$(realpath ~/.agents/skills/understand-domain 2>/dev/null || readlink -f ~/.agents/skills/understand-domain 2>/dev/null || echo "")
SELF_RELATIVE=$([ -n "$SKILL_REAL" ] && cd "$SKILL_REAL/../.." 2>/dev/null && pwd || echo "")
COPILOT_SKILL_REAL=$(realpath ~/.copilot/skills/understand-domain 2>/dev/null || readlink -f ~/.copilot/skills/understand-domain 2>/dev/null || echo "")
COPILOT_SELF_RELATIVE=$([ -n "$COPILOT_SKILL_REAL" ] && cd "$COPILOT_SKILL_REAL/../.." 2>/dev/null && pwd || echo "")
PLUGIN_ROOT=""
for candidate in \
"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}" \
"$HOME/.understand-anything-plugin" \
"$SELF_RELATIVE" \
"$COPILOT_SELF_RELATIVE" \
"$HOME/.codex/understand-anything/understand-anything-plugin" \
"$HOME/.opencode/understand-anything/understand-anything-plugin" \
"$HOME/.pi/understand-anything/understand-anything-plugin" \
"$HOME/understand-anything/understand-anything-plugin"; do
if [ -n "$candidate" ] && [ -f "$candidate/package.json" ] && [ -f "$candidate/pnpm-workspace.yaml" ]; then
PLUGIN_ROOT="$candidate"
break
fi
done
if [ -z "$PLUGIN_ROOT" ]; then
echo "Error: Cannot find the understand-anything plugin root."
echo "Checked:"
echo " - ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-<unset CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT>}"
echo " - $HOME/.understand-anything-plugin"
echo " - ${SELF_RELATIVE:-<unresolved path derived from ~/.agents/skills/understand-domain>}"
echo " - ${COPILOT_SELF_RELATIVE:-<unresolved path derived from ~/.copilot/skills/understand-domain>}"
echo " - $HOME/.codex/understand-anything/understand-anything-plugin"
echo " - $HOME/.opencode/understand-anything/understand-anything-plugin"
echo " - $HOME/.pi/understand-anything/understand-anything-plugin"
echo " - $HOME/understand-anything/understand-anything-plugin"
echo "Make sure the plugin is installed correctly."
exit 1
fi
Use $PLUGIN_ROOT for every reference to agent definitions in subsequent phases.
$UA_DIR/knowledge-graph.json exists--full was NOT passed, check freshness before deriving from it:
project.gitCommitHash from the graph metadata as GRAPH_COMMIT_RAW. Change to $PROJECT_ROOT, resolve it as a commit before using it in any Git diff, compare the resolved commit with git rev-parse HEAD, and inspect project-scoped committed and working-tree changes:
GRAPH_COMMIT=$(git rev-parse --verify --end-of-options "${GRAPH_COMMIT_RAW}^{commit}" 2>/dev/null)
git rev-parse HEAD
git diff --name-only "$GRAPH_COMMIT" HEAD -- .
git diff --cached --name-only -- .
git diff --name-only -- .
git ls-files --others --exclude-standard -- .
-- . pathspec is required: commits that only touch a sibling monorepo project must not make this graph stale. A hash mismatch alone is not stale when the project diff is empty..ua/ or legacy .understand-anything/) in every command's output because it contains generated graph artifacts, not project source drift./understand to refresh the knowledge graph.GRAPH_COMMIT_RAW resolves successfully. If the graph commit or Git metadata is missing, invalid, or unavailable, give a brief best-effort warning and continue instead of blocking.--full is used, skip this preflight because the command performs a fresh scan instead of consuming the existing graph.The preprocessing script does NOT produce a domain graph — it produces raw material (file tree, entry points, exports/imports) so the domain-analyzer agent can focus on the actual domain analysis instead of spending dozens of tool calls exploring the codebase. Think of it as a cheat sheet: cheap Python preprocessing → expensive LLM gets a clean, small input → better results for less cost.
$PROJECT_ROOT from Phase 0:
python ./extract-domain-context.py "$PROJECT_ROOT"
This outputs $UA_DIR/intermediate/domain-context.json containing:
.gitignore)domain-context.json as context for Phase 4$UA_DIR/knowledge-graph.jsoncalls, imports, contains)$PLUGIN_ROOT/agents/domain-analyzer.md$UA_DIR/intermediate/domain-analysis.json$UA_DIR/domain-graph.json$UA_DIR/intermediate/domain-analysis.json and $UA_DIR/intermediate/domain-context.json/understand-dashboard to visualize the domain graphdomain-graph.json and show the domain view by default还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
分析项目代码、配置、文档和基础设施文件,生成可交互探索的结构与依赖关系图。支持日语说明、文件排除,以及根据变更更新已有分析结果。
利用记录代码组成及其关系的知识图谱,查找与问题有关的文件和函数,追踪调用与依赖关系,并结合架构分层具体解释项目的工作方式。
启动交互式网页仪表板,以图形查看已分析代码库的结构和关系。可显示当前工作目录或指定项目的数据,并提供包含访问令牌的本地网址。
将 Git 差异或拉取请求与知识图谱对照,整理修改位置、周边影响、跨架构层关系及审查风险,并保存用于仪表板展示的数据。
结合现有知识图谱与实际源代码,详细解释指定文件、函数或模块的设计作用、调用关系、依赖及输入输出流程,帮助不熟悉该编程语言的读者理解代码。
分析 Figma 文件,将页面、界面、组件、实例及颜色等共享设计值之间的关系整理成图,并通过交互式仪表板查看整体设计结构。