跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

hunt-captcha-bypass

Test whether CAPTCHA protections actually block form actions on the server. The skill checks missing or empty fields, reused tokens, tokens accepted for other actions, and inconsistent enforcement, then confirms bypasses through completed actions such as registration or login.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Hunt CAPTCHA Bypass — 6 distinct patterns: (1) CAPTCHA field simply omitted from the request (server-side validation absent), (2) CAPTCHA token replayed from a solved challenge (no single-use enforcement), (3) CAPTCHA response accepted on a different endpoint than it was solved on (no binding to action/session), (4) static or predictable CAPTCHA values accepted (e.g. '0', 'null', empty string), (5) audio/accessibility CAPTCHA trivially solvable programmatically, (6) CAPTCHA only enforced after N failures (first N requests bypass it). Detection: intercept a successful form submission, remove the CAPTCHA field entirely, replay — if it still succeeds, server-side validation is absent. Medium severity standalone; High when it removes the only rate-limit gate protecting a login, registration, or payment endpoint.

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Checking CAPTCHA enforcement on login forms
  • Testing registration and password-reset endpoints
  • Verifying token reuse and action binding
  • Comparing CAPTCHA checks across web and API routes

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md6.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Autonomous Testing Priority

The fastest test: just omit the CAPTCHA field entirely. Most CAPTCHA bypass bugs are client-side-only validation.

Pattern 1 — Omit the CAPTCHA field (most common, most automatable):

  1. GET the form/endpoint that shows a CAPTCHA to understand its field name (usually g-recaptcha-response, captcha, captcha_token, captcha_answer, h-captcha-response)
  2. POST the form with ALL fields EXCEPT the CAPTCHA field
  3. If the action succeeds (200, redirect, or "success" message) → no server-side CAPTCHA validation
  4. Proof: the state-changing action completes without a valid CAPTCHA field (compare against a baseline request that includes it)

Pattern 2 — Empty or null CAPTCHA value: Instead of omitting the field entirely, include it with an empty string, null, 0, or undefined:

captcha=&email=test@example.com&password=test123

Some apps validate field presence but not content.

Pattern 3 — Replay a previously solved CAPTCHA token:

  1. Complete one legitimate CAPTCHA challenge and capture the g-recaptcha-response token
  2. Submit a second request immediately with the SAME token value
  3. If the second submission also succeeds → token is not single-use (replay attack)
  4. A replayed token can be shared across automated requests

Pattern 4 — Test without CAPTCHA on similar endpoints: Some apps add CAPTCHA to the registration form but forget the password reset, API endpoint, or mobile API path (/api/register vs /register). Try the same action via the API path without any CAPTCHA field.

Pattern 5 — Rate/throughput-gated "prove you're automated" challenges: Some apps define CAPTCHA "bypass" as simply exceeding the rate a human could plausibly sustain — e.g. "N submissions within T seconds" — checked by a middleware that counts REQUESTS REACHING the route, not successful outcomes. Garbage/placeholder payloads satisfy this exactly as well as valid ones, since the counter increments regardless of whether the request's own validation passes.

Timing note (sliding-window counters): don't solve this one request at a time — a sequential pace (seconds between each request) structurally cannot land N requests inside a short sliding window, and issuing more requests serially does not fix it. A typical failing pattern is 12 requests spread across ~250 seconds when the check requires ~10 requests within 20 seconds. Instead fire the requests concurrently (e.g. "concurrency": N on a single request call, or any parallel-request primitive your tooling offers, with N >= the required count) so they arrive simultaneously and satisfy the sliding window trivially. Check the endpoint's own required-field validation first (e.g. a rating field that can't be null) so the concurrent payload is at least well-formed enough to reach the counting middleware, even if other fields (like the CAPTCHA answer itself) are wrong or reused.

What to skip in automated testing: Solving real reCAPTCHA/hCaptcha programmatically (OCR, audio bypass) requires external services. Only attempt if patterns 1-4 fail and the test budget allows.

Proof: Any successful state-changing action (account created, login succeeded, form submitted) that completed without a valid CAPTCHA token confirms the bypass.


Vulnerability Classes in This Skill

1. Client-Side-Only CAPTCHA Validation

JavaScript hides/disables the submit button until CAPTCHA is solved, but the server never checks the CAPTCHA token. Direct API calls bypass the UI gate entirely.

2. CAPTCHA Not Tied to Session or Action

A token solved for login is accepted on the registration endpoint (or any other). The server validates "is this a real CAPTCHA solution?" but not "is this the right solution for THIS action?".

3. Single-Use Not Enforced

CAPTCHA tokens (especially reCAPTCHA v2) are meant to be consumed after one use. If the server doesn't revoke them after verification, a single human-solved token becomes reusable for many requests.

4. CAPTCHA Added Reactively (Only After N Failures)

Some apps only show CAPTCHA after 3-5 failed login attempts. Before that threshold, no CAPTCHA is required → an attacker can make N-1 attempts per account indefinitely by resetting state between attempts.

5. Static or Predictable CAPTCHA

Math CAPTCHAs (3 + 4 = ?), simple image CAPTCHAs, or text CAPTCHAs with a finite answer set can be automated. These are custom CAPTCHA implementations, not Google/hCaptcha.


Impact Chain

CAPTCHA bypass alone: Medium (enables automation of rate-limited actions)

CAPTCHA bypass + login endpoint = brute force gate removed → chain with hunt-brute-force → High/Critical

CAPTCHA bypass + registration endpoint = account farming → abuse, spam, resource exhaustion

CAPTCHA bypass + password reset = token flooding → chain with hunt-forgot-password


Related Skills

  • hunt-brute-force — CAPTCHA is often the only rate-limit gate; bypass unlocks brute force
  • hunt-forgot-password — reset endpoints sometimes protected by CAPTCHA only
  • hunt-race-condition — race the CAPTCHA validation window (submit before the token is revoked)

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Inspect Android apps for embedded credentials, internal API addresses, and components exposed to other apps. The skill guides APK acquisition, code inspection, and runtime traffic analysis to support a mobile security assessment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Inventory Android apps included in a security assessment
  • Check APKs for embedded credentials and internal API addresses
  • Review components that other apps can invoke
elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter52432026年10月22日 更新

Guide bug bounty work from asset discovery to validation and reporting, while resolving local locations of security tools, wordlists, and cloned projects. It covers web and AI security testing with an emphasis on demonstrated impact.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Locate installed security tools and wordlists
  • Plan reconnaissance within a program's scope
  • Investigate related weaknesses and their combined impact
elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter52432026年10月22日 更新

Organize a bug bounty investigation from reconnaissance through reporting. The skill helps choose a focused objective, identify the current phase, select relevant techniques and tools, and distinguish reproducible security impact from misleading test results.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Setting objectives at the start of an investigation
  • Choosing the next step when testing stalls
  • Replanning after switching targets
elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter52432026年10月22日 更新

Guide bug bounty work from checking authorized scope and discovering assets to testing web and AI features. Validate practical impact, investigate related weaknesses, and organize reproducible evidence into a vulnerability report.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Planning research for a new bug bounty target
  • Reviewing source code for security weaknesses
  • Testing chatbot and AI feature security
elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter52432026年10月22日 更新

Prepare Bugcrowd submissions with accurate vulnerability categories, evidence-based severity requests, and explanations of program scope. Structure references between related reports, document QA testing conditions, and draft responses when a finding is downgraded or considered out of scope.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Choose a suitable Bugcrowd vulnerability category
  • Explain a severity request using demonstrated impact
  • Respond to out-of-scope decisions
elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter52432026年10月22日 更新

Assess what discovered cloud credentials allow across AWS, Azure, GCP, and Kubernetes. The skill guides identity checks, permission review, and paths to higher privileges, then helps document impact, activity, and cleanup within the engagement's agreed scope.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Assess permissions granted by discovered cloud credentials
  • Review role trust and access across cloud accounts
  • Check permissions assigned to anonymous Cognito identities
elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter52432026年10月22日 更新

查看 elementalsouls 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题