跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

api-testing

Use when writing API endpoint tests — integration tests, contract validation, response assertions, mocked external services — even when the user says 'test this route' without naming API testing.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md8.2 KB
  • evals/triggers.json2.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

api-testing

When to use

Use this skill when writing or reviewing API endpoint tests — integration tests, contract validation, response structure checks, or external service mocking.

Procedure: Write API tests

  1. Understand the endpoint — Read the controller, form request, and existing tests. Understand expected behavior, edge cases, and auth requirements before writing anything.
  2. Set up test data — Use seeders (preferred) or factories. Mock external services with Http::fake().
  3. Enumerate test cases — Run the test-case-discovery funnel first; cover success, validation errors, authorization failures, and edge cases — floor per behavior: 1 happy + 1 boundary + 1 error (+1 abuse case; on data-returning endpoints the three broken-access-control negative tests are mandatory).
  4. Assert response — Check status code, JSON structure, data values. Use assertJsonStructure().
  5. Verify — Run the test. Must pass. Check no flaky assertions (no time-dependent, no random ordering).

Example

describe('GET /api/v1/projects', function () {
    it('returns paginated projects for authenticated user', function () {
        $user = loginAsTestUser();

        $response = $this->getJson('/api/v1/projects');

        $response->assertOk()
            ->assertJsonStructure([
                'data' => [['id', 'title', 'status']],
                'meta' => ['current_page', 'per_page', 'total'],
            ]);
    });

    it('returns 401 for unauthenticated request', function () {
        $this->getJson('/api/v1/projects')
            ->assertUnauthorized();
    });

    it('returns 403 when user lacks permission', function () {
        loginAsRestrictedUser();

        $this->getJson('/api/v1/projects')
            ->assertForbidden();
    });
});

Test categories

Happy path

Test the expected success scenario with valid input:

it('creates a project', function () {
    loginAsTestUser();

    $this->postJson('/api/v1/projects', [
        'title' => 'New Project',
        'customer_id' => $customerId,
    ])
        ->assertCreated()
        ->assertJsonPath('data.title', 'New Project');

    $this->assertDatabaseHas('projects', ['title' => 'New Project']);
});

Validation

Test that invalid input is rejected with correct error messages:

it('rejects project without title', function () {
    loginAsTestUser();

    $this->postJson('/api/v1/projects', [
        'customer_id' => $customerId,
    ])
        ->assertUnprocessable()
        ->assertJsonValidationErrors(['title']);
});

Authorization

Test that unauthorized access is blocked:

it('prevents non-owner from updating project', function () {
    $otherUser = loginAsOtherUser();

    $this->putJson("/api/v1/projects/{$project->id}", [
        'title' => 'Hijacked',
    ])
        ->assertForbidden();
});

Edge cases

Test boundary conditions:

it('handles empty collection', function () {
    loginAsTestUser();

    $this->getJson('/api/v1/projects')
        ->assertOk()
        ->assertJsonCount(0, 'data');
});

it('paginates large result sets', function () {
    loginAsTestUser();

    $this->getJson('/api/v1/projects?per_page=5')
        ->assertOk()
        ->assertJsonPath('meta.per_page', 5);
});

Response contract validation

Assert JSON structure

// Verify response shape (keys exist)
$response->assertJsonStructure([
    'data' => ['id', 'title', 'status', 'created_at'],
]);

// Verify exact values
$response->assertJsonPath('data.status', 'active');

// Verify collection count
$response->assertJsonCount(3, 'data');

Assert response types

// When strict typing matters
$data = $response->json('data');
expect($data['id'])->toBeInt();
expect($data['title'])->toBeString();
expect($data['total'])->toBeString(); // Money as string, not float

Filter noisy responses

When a failing test dumps the full JSON body, narrow the diagnosis with jq or grep instead of scrolling the whole payload:

# Extract only the failing assertion path
echo "$RESPONSE_JSON" | jq '.data.status, .errors'

# Targeted log scan
rg --json 'API call failed' storage/logs/laravel.log | jq -r '.data.lines.text'

External service mocking

it('handles external API failure gracefully', function () {
    Http::fake([
        'external-api.com/*' => Http::response(null, 500),
    ]);

    loginAsTestUser();

    $this->postJson('/api/v1/sync')
        ->assertStatus(502)
        ->assertJsonPath('message', 'External service unavailable');
});

Test checklist per endpoint

CategoryTests needed
AuthUnauthenticated (401), unauthorized (403)
ValidationMissing fields, wrong types, boundary values
Happy pathSuccess with valid input, correct status code
ResponseJSON structure, field types, pagination meta
Side effectsDatabase changes, events dispatched, jobs queued
Edge casesEmpty results, large payloads, concurrent access

Bridge to UI verification

API tests cover the contract layer. When an endpoint feeds a UI surface (Livewire component, Blade-rendered page, SPA route), complement the API test with a thin UI probe: a livewire test for wired components, or a Playwright spec / browser screenshot for the rendered shell. Never assume the UI works just because the API test is green.

Output format

  1. Test file in the project’s test framework (Pest, Jest, pytest) covering happy path, validation, auth, and edge cases
  2. Test names as readable sentences describing expected behavior
  3. Mocked external services where applicable

Auto-trigger keywords

  • API test
  • endpoint test
  • integration test
  • response validation
  • contract testing

Gotcha

  • Don't test framework internals (e.g., "does Laravel return 422 on validation error") — test YOUR validation rules.
  • Always seed test data explicitly — don't rely on data from other tests (parallel execution).
  • Mock external APIs with Http::fake() — never hit real services in tests.
  • The model forgets to assert response structure, only checking status codes — always check both.

Do NOT

  • Do not hardcode IDs or timestamps — use factories or seeders.
  • Do not skip auth tests — always test both authenticated and unauthenticated.
  • Do not assert entire JSON responses — assert only meaningful fields.
  • Do not use Http::fake() without also testing the real integration path.

Anti-bruteforce — diagnose before retry

When a test fails, do not retry blindly with tweaked assertions until something passes. Diagnose the root cause first: print the actual response shape once, compare it to the contract, then write a targeted fix. Trial-and-error retries hide real regressions.

Clarification guard — ambiguous contract → ask

If the endpoint contract is ambiguous (unclear status code, optional fields, error envelope shape), do not assume. Ask the user or check the OpenAPI spec / route definition before writing assertions — never guess the response shape from the route name.

The HTTP-assertion idiom, per ecosystem

The examples above are Laravel's. The shape they teach — assert the status, then the body contract, then the side effect, and keep one behavior per test — transfers unchanged; the API does not. Resolve the runner with resolve_toolchain and read its ecosystems:

ecosystemsRequest + assertion surface
php$this->getJson(...) / assertStatus / assertJsonPath
jssupertest or the framework's own test client, with expect(res.status)
pythonhttpx.AsyncClient / framework TestClient; assert res.status_code
gohttptest.NewServer + net/http, or the router's own ServeHTTP

Whatever the surface, the negative tests are not optional: unauthenticated, not-owner and cross-tenant each get their own case, per broken-access-control.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

event4u-app/agent-config122026年10月19日 更新

Use when defining or auditing the activation event — aha-moment selection, retention correlation, falsifiable definition. Triggers on 'what is our aha moment', 'redefine activation'.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

event4u-app/agent-config122026年10月19日 更新

Use when capturing an architectural decision — file naming, next ADR number, Status / Context / Decision / Consequences, index regen; fires even without saying 'ADR'.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

event4u-app/agent-config122026年10月19日 更新

Adversarial critique — devil's advocate, stress-test, honest teardown ('poke holes', 'be brutal', 'was hältst du davon'); explicit request only. Routine code or design review → code-review.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

event4u-app/agent-config122026年10月19日 更新

Use when reading, creating, or updating agent documentation, module docs, roadmaps, or AGENTS.md. Understands the full .augment/, agents/, and copilot-instructions structure.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

event4u-app/agent-config122026年10月19日 更新

Use for an adversarial red-team / blue-team / auditor review of an AI agent's CONFIG + behaviour (rules, skills, MCP, hooks, permissions) — attack-chain → defensive-gap list, not a code audit.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

event4u-app/agent-config122026年10月19日 更新

查看 event4u-app 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题