跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

ce-promote

Draft announcements for a shipped feature, explaining what users can now do and why it matters. Produce copy-ready text tailored to channels such as X, LinkedIn, email, release notes, blogs, or demo scripts.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Draft launch or promotion copy for a shipped feature.

集成工具LinkedIn
查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Announcing a new feature on X
  • Writing a concise release note
  • Preparing LinkedIn posts and announcement emails
  • Drafting a blog introduction or demo script

包含的文件(3)

  • SKILL.md6.6 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml43 B
  • references/spiral-cli.md12.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Promotion Copy

Turn a feature that just shipped into copy-pasteable, user-facing announcement copy, right inside the engineering workflow — so the messaging doesn't wait for a separate marketing pass.

Done when: every drafted channel is presented as a labeled, copy-pasteable block and the user has been offered a revision. This skill drafts only — it never posts, publishes, schedules, commits, or opens PRs. Posting is a human action.

It works with or without Spiral: with nothing installed it drafts directly from the editorial and social fundamentals in Path B (Direct drafting). When the Spiral CLI is present and authed, drafts come back voice-matched to the user's brand — an enhancement, never a requirement.

Phase 1 — Figure out what shipped

A free-form description in the arguments is the source of truth. Otherwise derive it from context, using what is available and never waiting on any single source:

  • Merged/active PR — gh pr view --json title,body,url (the title and body usually state the user-facing value)
  • The diff — git diff main...HEAD --stat, skimming notable changes so the claim is grounded in what actually changed
  • Changelog — the top or [Unreleased] entry in docs/changelog.md, CHANGELOG.md, or similar
  • Recent commits — git log --oneline -15 for the arc of the change

Then write a 1-3 sentence summary of the user-facing value: what a user can now do that they couldn't before, and why they'd care. Outcome, not implementation — "You can now export any report to CSV in one click", not "Added a CsvSerializer and an export endpoint." If you can't confidently tell what shipped, ask one short question rather than guessing.

Phase 2 — Pick channels

Default to an X post (or short thread) plus a one-line changelog / release blurb. If the user named channels — LinkedIn, email, a blog intro, a demo script — draft those instead of or in addition to the defaults. Scale to the change: a small fix warrants one or two short drafts, a flagship feature a cross-channel set. Don't force a fixed template.

Phase 3 — Draft the copy

Detect Spiral's state with two quick, non-blocking commands:

which spiral
spiral auth status --json 2>/dev/null
  • No binary -> Absent
  • "authenticated": true -> Ready
  • "authenticated": false -> Unauthed
  • Output isn't JSON (older CLI that ignores --json) -> ready iff it contains spiral_sk_, else unauthed

Ready -> Path A (Spiral ready). Absent or Unauthed -> Path 0 (Offer Spiral setup), then Path A if setup completes, else Path B (Direct drafting). Never let a Spiral failure, timeout, or odd output block or slow the skill — when in doubt, treat it as not-ready and continue.

Path 0 — Offer Spiral setup (once, declinable)

Go straight to Path B when running non-interactively — there is no human to answer. Otherwise offer setup once: read references/spiral-cli.md and follow its Path 0 section for the opt-out check, the blocking question, the agent-run spiral login --json flow (the API key never passes through the agent, and the user never pastes one into chat), the install path, and how the opt-out is recorded. Skip to Path B only when that check finds a recorded opt-out. That section defines what counts as recorded; a naive config scan misreads ce-setup's commented template example as one, silently suppressing the offer.

Two properties that section depends on: any dismissal records the opt-out, so a single first-run decline stops the offer for good in this repo, and a decline always proceeds to Path B rather than blocking. If a human is present but no blocking-question tool is in the current tool list, fall back to a numbered list of the two options in chat and wait — do not skip the offer, and never call a user-facing question tool to discover whether one exists.

Path A — Spiral ready (voice-matched)

Read references/spiral-cli.md before composing the prompt. Whether Spiral returns a multi-channel set or several variations of one channel is phrasing-driven (channel keywords and cue words vs. --num-drafts), and getting it wrong silently returns the wrong number or shape of drafts — don't restate those rules from memory.

Always pass --instant and --json; parse drafts[] (each carries its own channel) plus session_id. Present every returned draft, grouped by channel — Spiral decides how many drafts per channel, so never assume one-per-channel or drop extras. If the spiral write call errors or returns no usable drafts, fall back silently to Path B for the affected channels.

Path B — Direct drafting

No Spiral needed. Draft every channel through the ce-noslop skill. (The Spiral path goes further: brand-voice matching, humanization, saved styles, and cross-channel campaign orchestration.)

Every channel:

  • Lead with the user-facing outcome — what someone can now do, not how it was built.
  • One idea per piece.

Distributed channels: the first line is the hook and has to make the reader want the next line (feeds truncate). No preamble. Match each channel's native shape and length; never reuse one draft verbatim across channels. One clear CTA where the channel supports it. Hashtags 0-2, and only where the channel expects them.

Per channel:

  • X — value in the first line; ~1-3 tight lines. Thread only when there's more than one beat worth its own line.
  • Changelog / release blurb — one declarative line naming the new capability. Plain, not promotional.
  • LinkedIn — a short paragraph: human angle (why it matters), then the what. Warmer than X.
  • Email — benefit-stating subject + 2-4 sentence body + one CTA.
  • Blog intro — one opening paragraph framing the problem and the new capability; leave the deep-dive to the author.
  • Demo script — 3-6 spoken beats: hook, problem, action, payoff.

One strong draft per channel by default; produce more only when asked ("3 tweet options"), capped at ~3.

Phase 4 — Present the drafts

Show every draft as a clean, copy-pasteable block labeled by channel:

### X post
<the copy>

When Path A produced them, also show the session_id and each draft's url so the user can open and tweak them in the Spiral web app. Offer to revise (tone, length, angle, more variations, another channel). Do not post, publish, schedule, commit, or open a PR — end by reminding the user the drafts are theirs to ship.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Monitor an open GitHub pull request over time, respond to review feedback, and address automated check failures. Apply and push fixes, then report whether it appears ready to merge or what still blocks progress.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Monitoring a pull request until it appears ready to merge
  • Addressing review feedback as it arrives
  • Handling automated check failures during review
EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin2.6万2026年10月19日 更新

Develop independent solutions to a defined problem, compare them against shared requirements, and combine useful contributions into a coherent recommendation. An independent assessment and evidence checks support the selection, while unresolved tradeoffs and verification needs remain explicit.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Comparing concrete solutions to a defined problem
  • Developing rough options before choosing an approach
  • Comparing architectural or product proposals
EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin2.6万2026年10月19日 更新

Turn a vague feature idea into clear requirements through dialogue. Define what to build, its scope, and success criteria, then capture the result in a short chat summary or a requirements document ready for implementation planning.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Clarifying a vague feature idea
  • Narrowing the scope of an ambitious improvement
  • Documenting requirements before implementation planning
EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin2.6万2026年10月19日 更新

Review code changes or a pull request for bugs, effects on existing behavior, test gaps, and project standards. Receive findings supported by the code and a clear account of review coverage, with local fixes available when explicitly requested.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing a pull request before release
  • Checking changes for bugs and test gaps
  • Applying review findings locally
EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin2.6万2026年10月19日 更新

ce-commit

免费

Save working changes as local Git commits with messages that explain the outcome. Follow the project's commit style, select files explicitly, and split clearly separate changes into a few logical commits when appropriate.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Saving completed work as a local commit
  • Writing messages that explain the outcome
  • Separating unrelated changes into commits
EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin2.6万2026年10月19日 更新

Commit and push code changes, then open a pull request with a clear title and description. You can also draft or update PR descriptions and hand published requests to the follow-up monitoring workflow.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Committing changes and opening a pull request
  • Drafting only a PR title and description
  • Updating an existing PR description
EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin2.6万2026年10月19日 更新

查看 EveryInc 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题