跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

react-router-v7

React Router v7 best practices for data-driven routing. Use when implementing routes, loaders, actions, Form components, fetchers, navigation guards, protected routes, or URL search params. Triggers on createBrowserRouter, RouterProvider, useLoaderData, useActionData, useFetcher, NavLink, Outlet.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(9)

  • SKILL.md4.0 KB
  • ACTIONS.md4.1 KB
  • ADVANCED.md4.0 KB
  • LOADERS.md2.1 KB
  • NAVIGATION.md2.7 KB
  • references/actions.md4.6 KB
  • references/advanced.md5.2 KB
  • references/loaders.md2.4 KB
  • references/navigation.md3.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

React Router v7 Best Practices

Quick Reference

Router Setup (Data Mode):

import { createBrowserRouter, RouterProvider } from "react-router";

const router = createBrowserRouter([
  {
    path: "/",
    Component: Root,
    ErrorBoundary: RootErrorBoundary,
    loader: rootLoader,
    children: [
      { index: true, Component: Home },
      { path: "products/:productId", Component: Product, loader: productLoader },
    ],
  },
]);

ReactDOM.createRoot(root).render(<RouterProvider router={router} />);

Framework Mode (Vite plugin):

// routes.ts
import { index, route } from "@react-router/dev/routes";

export default [
  index("./home.tsx"),
  route("products/:pid", "./product.tsx"),
];

Route Configuration

Nested Routes with Outlets

createBrowserRouter([
  {
    path: "/dashboard",
    Component: Dashboard,
    children: [
      { index: true, Component: DashboardHome },
      { path: "settings", Component: Settings },
    ],
  },
]);

function Dashboard() {
  return (
    <div>
      <h1>Dashboard</h1>
      <Outlet /> {/* Renders child routes */}
    </div>
  );
}

Dynamic Segments and Splats

{ path: "teams/:teamId" }           // params.teamId
{ path: ":lang?/categories" }       // Optional segment
{ path: "files/*" }                 // Splat: params["*"]

Key Decision Points

Form vs Fetcher

Use <Form>: Creating/deleting with URL change, adding to history Use useFetcher: Inline updates, list operations, popovers - no URL change

Loader vs useEffect

Use loader: Data before render, server-side fetch, automatic revalidation Use useEffect: Client-only data, user-interaction dependent, subscriptions

Gates (decision sequencing)

Answer in order. Pass means the condition is true; pick the API on the same line and stop.

<Form> vs useFetcher

  1. Must the URL or history stack change (bookmark/share, back returns to prior screen)?
    • Pass → <Form> / route action (or useSubmit + navigation). Stop.
    • Fail → Step 2.
  2. Mutation stays on the same route (inline edit, modal, list row, no address change)?
    • Pass → useFetcher(). Stop.
    • Fail → Re-check step 1; you may need a dedicated action route or POST to the current URL.

loader vs useEffect

  1. Is data needed for correct first render (or your intended <Suspense> boundary) for this route?
    • Pass → loader (Framework: clientLoader when appropriate). Stop.
    • Fail → Step 2.
  2. Fetch only after mount from user action, timer, or subscription (not route entry)?
    • Pass → useEffect / event handlers. Stop.
    • Fail → Prefer loader + revalidation over an effect that mirrors navigation.

Additional Documentation

Mode Comparison

FeatureFramework ModeData ModeDeclarative Mode
SetupVite plugincreateBrowserRouter<BrowserRouter>
Type SafetyAuto-generated typesManualManual
SSR SupportBuilt-inManualLimited
Use CaseFull-stack appsSPAs with controlSimple/legacy

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Use when you need to mine a conversation, session transcript, or design discussion for architectural decisions before writing ADRs. Identifies problem-solution pairs, trade-off debates, technology choices, and explicit "[ADR]" tags. Triggers on "what decisions did we make", "extract decisions from this chat", "find the choices in our discussion", or "summarize architectural decisions". Also useful after long planning sessions to capture decisions that were made implicitly. Does NOT write ADR documents — use adr-writing or write-adr for that.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

existential-birds/beagle842026年9月16日 更新

Use when writing or formatting an ADR document using the MADR template, applying Definition of Done (E.C.A.D.R.) criteria, or verifying ADR completeness. Triggers on "write the ADR", "format as MADR", "check ADR quality", "mark gaps in ADR". Also triggers when a decision has been extracted and needs to become a document. Does NOT extract decisions from conversations (use adr-decision-extraction) or orchestrate the full extract-confirm-write workflow (use write-adr).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

existential-birds/beagle842026年9月16日 更新

Use when auditing an agent codebase against the 12-Factor Agents methodology, reviewing LLM-powered system architecture, or assessing agentic app compliance. Triggers on "analyze agent architecture", "12-factor audit", "how compliant is this agent", or "evaluate this LLM app". Also applies when comparing frameworks or planning agent improvements. Not for quick checklists — this performs deep per-factor codebase analysis with file-level evidence.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

existential-birds/beagle842026年9月16日 更新

Vercel AI Elements for workflow UI components. Use when building chat interfaces, displaying tool execution, showing reasoning/thinking, or creating job queues. Triggers on ai-elements, Queue, Confirmation, Tool, Reasoning, Shimmer, Loader, Message, Conversation, PromptInput.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

existential-birds/beagle842026年9月16日 更新

Reviews App Intents code for intent structure, entities, shortcuts, and parameters. Use when reviewing code with import AppIntents, @AppIntent, AppEntity, AppShortcutsProvider, or @Parameter.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

existential-birds/beagle842026年9月16日 更新

Use when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: "analyze these docs", "scan my project for context", "read the docs folder", "summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/", "extract context from docs/", "what's in this folder", "go read everything in X and tell me what's there". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

existential-birds/beagle842026年9月16日 更新

查看 existential-birds 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题