跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

vitest-testing

Vitest testing framework patterns and best practices. Use when writing unit tests, integration tests, configuring vitest.config, mocking with vi.mock/vi.fn, using snapshots, or setting up test coverage. Triggers on describe, it, expect, vi.mock, vi.fn, beforeEach, afterEach, vitest.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(7)

  • SKILL.md3.5 KB
  • CONFIG.md3.1 KB
  • MOCKING.md2.7 KB
  • PATTERNS.md3.3 KB
  • references/config.md3.4 KB
  • references/mocking.md3.2 KB
  • references/patterns.md3.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Vitest Best Practices

Quick Reference

import { describe, it, expect, beforeEach, vi } from 'vitest'

describe('feature name', () => {
  beforeEach(() => {
    vi.clearAllMocks()
  })

  it('should do something specific', () => {
    expect(actual).toBe(expected)
  })

  it.todo('planned test')
  it.skip('temporarily disabled')
  it.only('run only this during dev')
})

Common Assertions

// Equality
expect(value).toBe(42)                    // Strict (===)
expect(obj).toEqual({ a: 1 })             // Deep equality
expect(obj).toStrictEqual({ a: 1 })       // Strict deep (checks types)

// Truthiness
expect(value).toBeTruthy()
expect(value).toBeFalsy()
expect(value).toBeNull()
expect(value).toBeUndefined()

// Numbers
expect(0.1 + 0.2).toBeCloseTo(0.3)
expect(value).toBeGreaterThan(5)

// Strings/Arrays
expect(str).toMatch(/pattern/)
expect(str).toContain('substring')
expect(array).toContain(item)
expect(array).toHaveLength(3)

// Objects
expect(obj).toHaveProperty('key')
expect(obj).toHaveProperty('nested.key', 'value')
expect(obj).toMatchObject({ subset: 'of properties' })

// Exceptions
expect(() => fn()).toThrow()
expect(() => fn()).toThrow('error message')
expect(() => fn()).toThrow(/pattern/)

Async Testing

// Async/await (preferred)
it('fetches data', async () => {
  const data = await fetchData()
  expect(data).toEqual({ id: 1 })
})

// Promise matchers - ALWAYS await these
await expect(fetchData()).resolves.toEqual({ id: 1 })
await expect(fetchData()).rejects.toThrow('Error')

// Wrong - creates false positive
expect(promise).resolves.toBe(value)  // Missing await!

Quick Mock Reference

const mockFn = vi.fn()
mockFn.mockReturnValue(42)
mockFn.mockResolvedValue({ data: 'value' })

expect(mockFn).toHaveBeenCalled()
expect(mockFn).toHaveBeenCalledWith('arg1', 'arg2')
expect(mockFn).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2)

Verification gates

Use this sequence when you add or change tests; each step has an objective pass condition.

  1. Run the test suite — From the package or workspace root, run the same command CI uses (check package.json scripts; often vitest run, pnpm test, or npm test). Pass: exit code is 0 and the report shows zero failing tests.
  2. Async matchers — Pass: every expect(…).resolves and expect(…).rejects is prefixed with await (await expect(...)), as in Async Testing. A line where resolves or rejects appears without await fails this gate.

Additional Documentation

Test Methods Quick Reference

MethodPurpose
it() / test()Define test
describe()Group tests
beforeEach() / afterEach()Per-test hooks
beforeAll() / afterAll()Per-suite hooks
.skipSkip test/suite
.onlyRun only this
.todoPlaceholder
.concurrentParallel execution
.each([...])Parameterized tests

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Use when you need to mine a conversation, session transcript, or design discussion for architectural decisions before writing ADRs. Identifies problem-solution pairs, trade-off debates, technology choices, and explicit "[ADR]" tags. Triggers on "what decisions did we make", "extract decisions from this chat", "find the choices in our discussion", or "summarize architectural decisions". Also useful after long planning sessions to capture decisions that were made implicitly. Does NOT write ADR documents — use adr-writing or write-adr for that.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

existential-birds/beagle842026年9月16日 更新

Use when writing or formatting an ADR document using the MADR template, applying Definition of Done (E.C.A.D.R.) criteria, or verifying ADR completeness. Triggers on "write the ADR", "format as MADR", "check ADR quality", "mark gaps in ADR". Also triggers when a decision has been extracted and needs to become a document. Does NOT extract decisions from conversations (use adr-decision-extraction) or orchestrate the full extract-confirm-write workflow (use write-adr).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

existential-birds/beagle842026年9月16日 更新

Use when auditing an agent codebase against the 12-Factor Agents methodology, reviewing LLM-powered system architecture, or assessing agentic app compliance. Triggers on "analyze agent architecture", "12-factor audit", "how compliant is this agent", or "evaluate this LLM app". Also applies when comparing frameworks or planning agent improvements. Not for quick checklists — this performs deep per-factor codebase analysis with file-level evidence.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

existential-birds/beagle842026年9月16日 更新

Vercel AI Elements for workflow UI components. Use when building chat interfaces, displaying tool execution, showing reasoning/thinking, or creating job queues. Triggers on ai-elements, Queue, Confirmation, Tool, Reasoning, Shimmer, Loader, Message, Conversation, PromptInput.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

existential-birds/beagle842026年9月16日 更新

Reviews App Intents code for intent structure, entities, shortcuts, and parameters. Use when reviewing code with import AppIntents, @AppIntent, AppEntity, AppShortcutsProvider, or @Parameter.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

existential-birds/beagle842026年9月16日 更新

Use when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: "analyze these docs", "scan my project for context", "read the docs folder", "summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/", "extract context from docs/", "what's in this folder", "go read everything in X and tell me what's there". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

existential-birds/beagle842026年9月16日 更新

查看 existential-birds 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题