跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

bond-verification

Formally verify construction payment bonds by extracting fields from bond documents and cross-referencing against Treasury Circular 570, state licensing, and underwriting limits. Use whenever the user uploads a payment bond PDF, mentions bond verification, asks "is this bond valid", references AIA A312, or needs to verify a surety company's authority to write bonds. Also trigger on "verify bond", "check surety", "payment bond", "performance bond", or "Circular 570."

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(4)

  • SKILL.md4.0 KB
  • references/bond-field-definitions.md1.8 KB
  • references/circular-570-verification.md2.1 KB
  • scripts/validate_bond_verification.py1.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Payment Bond Formal Verification

Verify that a construction payment bond is valid, the surety is authorized, and the bond covers the project requirements. This is the marketplace's trust layer — operators won't bid on tasks without verified payment security.

Workflow

1. Accept bond document

Accept: pasted bond text, PDF file path, or extracted fields (bond number, surety, principal, obligee, penal sum, date). If a PDF, extract text and identify the AIA A312 or ConsensusDocs 260 field structure.

2. Extract bond fields

Identify and extract these fields. Mark each as FOUND or NOT FOUND:

  • Bond number
  • Surety company name
  • Surety NAIC code (if present)
  • Principal (contractor) legal name and address
  • Obligee (project owner / agency)
  • Project description / contract reference
  • Penal sum (bond amount in dollars)
  • Effective date
  • Expiration date (if any — many bonds are open-ended until project completion)
  • Power of Attorney reference
  • Surety agent name and signature

3. Verify surety against Circular 570

Read references/circular-570-verification.md for the verification process.

Check:

  • Is the surety listed on Treasury Circular 570? (federally approved)
  • Is the surety licensed in the project's state?
  • Is the penal sum within the surety's underwriting limit?
  • What is the surety's AM Best rating? (A- or better is standard)

4. Verify bond coverage

Check:

  • Does the penal sum cover the total task value(s) being posted?
  • Is the effective date before or on the task posting date?
  • Does the obligee match the project owner referenced in the RFP?
  • Does the principal match the entity posting tasks on the marketplace?

5. Generate verification report

Output:

{
  "verification_status": "VERIFIED | FAILED | PARTIAL",
  "bond_number": "...",
  "surety": {
    "name": "...",
    "circular_570_listed": true,
    "state_licensed": true,
    "underwriting_limit": "$...",
    "am_best_rating": "A+",
    "naic_code": "..."
  },
  "principal": "...",
  "obligee": "...",
  "penal_sum": "$...",
  "coverage_sufficient": true,
  "effective_date": "...",
  "checks": [
    {"check": "Surety on Circular 570", "result": "PASS|FAIL", "detail": "..."},
    {"check": "Licensed in MI", "result": "PASS|FAIL", "detail": "..."},
    {"check": "Penal sum covers tasks", "result": "PASS|FAIL", "detail": "..."},
    {"check": "Bond is current", "result": "PASS|FAIL", "detail": "..."},
    {"check": "Obligee matches project", "result": "PASS|FAIL", "detail": "..."},
    {"check": "Principal matches poster", "result": "PASS|FAIL", "detail": "..."}
  ],
  "warnings": [],
  "requires_human": ["Contact surety to confirm bond is active (not cancelled)"]
}

6. Validate output

python scripts/validate_bond_verification.py < report.json

References

  • references/circular-570-verification.md — How to check Circular 570, state licensing, and underwriting limits. Includes URLs for Treasury data download and surety verification portals.
  • references/bond-field-definitions.md — AIA A312 and ConsensusDocs 260 field definitions and where to find them in the document.

What this skill explicitly CANNOT do

This skill verifies the bond document against public records. It does NOT:

  • Contact the surety to confirm the bond is still active
  • Verify the Power of Attorney authenticity
  • Provide legal advice on bond adequacy
  • Replace attorney review for disputed bonds

These limitations are stated in every output under requires_human.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Complete architecture reference for the A3 insurance platform — file locations, data flow, conventions, microservice map, and fullstack patterns

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills792026年7月12日 更新

Drafts U.S. commercial real estate access and indemnity (right-of-entry) agreements for pre-closing due diligence. Covers license grants, non-invasive vs invasive testing gates, insurance/endorsement requirements, indemnity with discovery carve-outs, restoration and lien remedies, confidentiality, and anti-indemnity guardrails. Trigger: access agreement, right of entry, due diligence access, Phase I/II, invasive testing, pre-PSA site inspection.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills792026年7月12日 更新

当用户需要对意外险投保问卷进行专业、结构化的核保审查,提取职业类别、工作环境、作业内容、危险活动参与情况、交通出行习惯、特殊工作暴露及其他可能影响意外险承保判断的高风险信息,并生成适合意外险核保、补问流转和风险分层处理的结构化分析结果时使用本 skill。

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills792026年7月12日 更新

Inspect, schema, and fill true AcroForm PDFs using sciClaw's pdf_form_inspect, pdf_form_schema, and pdf_form_fill tools. Use when: (1) checking whether a PDF is a real fillable AcroForm, (2) listing form field names, types, and choices, (3) filling a supported form from structured values, (4) preparing reviewable insurance, legal, administrative, or clinical form drafts, (5) reporting skipped fields or unused input keys after a fill. Do not use for scanned PDFs, OCR tasks, or XFA-only forms.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills792026年7月12日 更新

Guide actuarial analysis for insurance pricing. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with actuarial-analysis related tasks.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills792026年7月12日 更新

Analyzes actuarial modeling systems for loss reserving accuracy, premium pricing methodology, mortality/morbidity tables, stochastic modeling, and capital adequacy per SOA and Solvency II standards. USE THIS SKILL WHEN: - You need to review or audit actuarial models (reserving, pricing, capital) - Someone asks about loss triangle analysis or reserve adequacy - You are evaluating IBNR calculations, chain ladder methods, or Bornhuetter-Ferguson - A project involves insurance pricing, GLM rating models, or ratemaking - You need to assess Solvency II SCR calculations or RBC compliance - Someone mentions actuarial opinions, ASOP compliance, or SOA standards - You are reviewing stochastic models, ESG configurations, or DFA frameworks - A codebase uses actuarial libraries (chainladder, lifetables, ChainLadder R package) TRIGGER PHRASES: "actuarial", "loss reserving", "IBNR", "chain ladder", "premium pricing", "mortality table", "Solvency II", "capital adequacy", "ratemaking", "GLM pricing", "risk-based capital", "reserve analysis", "actuarial opinion"

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills792026年7月12日 更新

查看 FDU-INS 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题