跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

bio-atac-seq-motif-deviation

Analyze ATAC-seq data with chromVAR to compare accessibility at motifs, DNA patterns recognized by transcription factors. Calculate sample scores, rank variable motifs, test group differences, and visualize patterns with heatmaps and PCA.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Analyze transcription factor motif accessibility variability using chromVAR. Use when identifying which TF motifs show variable accessibility across samples or conditions in ATAC-seq data.

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Find transcription factor motifs that vary across samples
  • Compare motif accessibility between experimental groups
  • Visualize sample patterns with heatmaps and PCA
  • Analyze single-cell ATAC-seq data aggregated by cluster

包含的文件(3)

  • SKILL.md8.9 KB
  • examples/chromvar_analysis.R2.9 KB
  • usage-guide.md2.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Version Compatibility

Reference examples tested with: ggplot2 3.5+, limma 3.58+

Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:

  • R: packageVersion('<pkg>') then ?function_name to verify parameters

If code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.

Motif Deviation Analysis

"Which TF motifs show variable accessibility across my samples?" → Compute per-sample deviation scores for TF motif accessibility to identify regulators driving chromatin state differences.

  • R: chromVAR::computeDeviations(counts, motifs)

Measure per-sample variability in transcription factor motif accessibility using chromVAR. This identifies TFs whose binding sites show differential accessibility across conditions.

Required Packages

library(chromVAR)
library(motifmatchr)
library(BSgenome.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38)  # or appropriate genome
library(JASPAR2020)
library(TFBSTools)
library(SummarizedExperiment)

Basic Workflow

Goal: Run chromVAR to compute per-sample TF motif deviation scores from ATAC-seq peak counts.

Approach: Load peak counts into a SummarizedExperiment, correct for GC bias, filter low-quality peaks, match JASPAR motifs, and compute deviation z-scores.

1. Load Peak Counts

library(chromVAR)
library(SummarizedExperiment)

# From count matrix and peak ranges
peaks <- read.table('peaks.bed', col.names = c('chr', 'start', 'end'))
peak_ranges <- GRanges(seqnames = peaks$chr, ranges = IRanges(peaks$start, peaks$end))

counts <- read.table('counts.txt', header = TRUE, row.names = 1)
counts_matrix <- as.matrix(counts)

fragment_counts <- SummarizedExperiment(
    assays = list(counts = counts_matrix),
    rowRanges = peak_ranges
)

2. Add GC Bias Correction

library(BSgenome.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38)

fragment_counts <- addGCBias(fragment_counts, genome = BSgenome.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38)

3. Filter Low-Quality Peaks

# min_depth=1500: Minimum total reads per sample. Adjust based on library size.
# min_in_peaks=0.15: Minimum fraction of reads in peaks (FRiP). 0.15 = 15%.
fragment_counts <- filterSamples(fragment_counts, min_depth = 1500, min_in_peaks = 0.15)

# min_count=10: Require peaks with >=10 reads across samples.
# n_samples_frac=0.1: Peak must be detected in >=10% of samples.
fragment_counts <- filterPeaks(fragment_counts, non_overlapping = TRUE,
                                min_count = 10, n_samples_frac = 0.1)

Get Motif Annotations

From JASPAR

library(JASPAR2020)
library(TFBSTools)
library(motifmatchr)

# Get vertebrate motifs from JASPAR
pfm <- getMatrixSet(JASPAR2020, opts = list(collection = 'CORE', tax_group = 'vertebrates'))

# Match motifs to peaks
# p.cutoff=5e-5: Motif match p-value threshold. Lower = more stringent.
motif_ix <- matchMotifs(pfm, fragment_counts, genome = BSgenome.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38, p.cutoff = 5e-5)

From CIS-BP or Custom PWMs

# Load custom motifs from file
library(universalmotif)
motifs <- read_meme('custom_motifs.meme')
pfm_list <- lapply(motifs, function(m) convert_motifs(m, class = 'TFBSTools-PFMatrix'))

motif_ix <- matchMotifs(pfm_list, fragment_counts, genome = BSgenome.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38)

Compute Deviations

# Compute chromVAR deviation scores
dev <- computeDeviations(object = fragment_counts, annotations = motif_ix)

# Extract deviation scores (z-scores)
deviation_scores <- deviations(dev)

# Extract variability across samples
variability <- computeVariability(dev)

Interpreting Results

Deviation Scores

# Deviation z-scores: positive = more accessible than expected
# Compare across samples
dev_matrix <- deviations(dev)
print(dim(dev_matrix))  # motifs x samples

# Get top variable motifs
var_df <- variability
var_df <- var_df[order(-var_df$variability), ]
head(var_df, 20)

Variability Interpretation

VariabilityInterpretation
> 2.0Highly variable across samples
1.0 - 2.0Moderately variable
< 1.0Low variability

Visualization

Deviation Heatmap

library(pheatmap)

# Get top variable motifs
# n_top=50: Number of top variable motifs to display.
n_top <- 50
top_motifs <- head(rownames(var_df), n_top)
top_dev <- deviation_scores[top_motifs, ]

# Add sample annotations
sample_info <- data.frame(
    Condition = colData(fragment_counts)$condition,
    row.names = colnames(top_dev)
)

pheatmap(top_dev, annotation_col = sample_info, scale = 'row',
         clustering_method = 'ward.D2', show_rownames = TRUE)

Variability Plot

plotVariability(variability, use_plotly = FALSE)

PCA of Deviation Scores

library(ggplot2)

# PCA on deviation scores
pca <- prcomp(t(deviation_scores), scale. = TRUE)
pca_df <- data.frame(PC1 = pca$x[,1], PC2 = pca$x[,2],
                     Condition = colData(fragment_counts)$condition)

ggplot(pca_df, aes(x = PC1, y = PC2, color = Condition)) +
    geom_point(size = 3) +
    theme_minimal() +
    labs(title = 'PCA of chromVAR Deviations')

Differential Motif Accessibility

Goal: Identify TF motifs with significantly different accessibility between experimental groups.

Approach: Fit a linear model (limma) to deviation z-scores across groups and extract significant motifs with empirical Bayes moderation.

Compare Two Groups

library(limma)

# Get sample groups
groups <- factor(colData(fragment_counts)$condition)

# Design matrix
design <- model.matrix(~ groups)

# Fit linear model to deviation scores
fit <- lmFit(deviation_scores, design)
fit <- eBayes(fit)

# Get differential motifs
# p.value=0.05: FDR threshold for significance.
diff_motifs <- topTable(fit, coef = 2, number = Inf, p.value = 0.05)
print(head(diff_motifs, 20))

Volcano Plot

library(ggplot2)

all_results <- topTable(fit, coef = 2, number = Inf)
all_results$significant <- all_results$adj.P.Val < 0.05

ggplot(all_results, aes(x = logFC, y = -log10(adj.P.Val), color = significant)) +
    geom_point(alpha = 0.6) +
    geom_hline(yintercept = -log10(0.05), linetype = 'dashed') +
    scale_color_manual(values = c('grey', 'red')) +
    theme_minimal() +
    labs(title = 'Differential Motif Accessibility',
         x = 'Log2 Fold Change', y = '-log10(adjusted p-value)')

Working with Single-Cell ATAC-seq

# For scATAC-seq, aggregate cells by cluster first
# Then run chromVAR on pseudo-bulk profiles

# Or use chromVAR with sparse matrices
library(Matrix)

# Create SummarizedExperiment with sparse counts
sparse_counts <- Matrix(counts_matrix, sparse = TRUE)
fragment_counts <- SummarizedExperiment(
    assays = list(counts = sparse_counts),
    rowRanges = peak_ranges
)

# Proceed with standard workflow
fragment_counts <- addGCBias(fragment_counts, genome = BSgenome.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38)

Background Peaks Strategy

# Custom background for better bias correction
# n_iterations=50: Number of background sets. Higher = more stable but slower.
bg <- getBackgroundPeaks(object = fragment_counts, niterations = 50)

# Use custom background in deviation calculation
dev <- computeDeviations(object = fragment_counts, annotations = motif_ix, background_peaks = bg)

Export Results

# Save deviation scores
write.csv(as.data.frame(deviation_scores), 'chromvar_deviations.csv')

# Save variability
write.csv(variability, 'chromvar_variability.csv')

# Save differential results
write.csv(diff_motifs, 'differential_motifs.csv')

Complete Workflow

Goal: Run end-to-end chromVAR analysis from peak counts to motif variability scores.

Approach: Load counts, correct GC bias, filter peaks, match JASPAR motifs, compute deviations, and plot variability.

library(chromVAR)
library(motifmatchr)
library(BSgenome.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38)
library(JASPAR2020)
library(TFBSTools)

# 1. Load data
fragment_counts <- getCounts('peaks.bed', c('sample1.bam', 'sample2.bam', 'sample3.bam'))

# 2. Add GC bias
fragment_counts <- addGCBias(fragment_counts, genome = BSgenome.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38)

# 3. Filter
fragment_counts <- filterPeaks(fragment_counts)

# 4. Get motifs
pfm <- getMatrixSet(JASPAR2020, opts = list(collection = 'CORE', tax_group = 'vertebrates'))
motif_ix <- matchMotifs(pfm, fragment_counts, genome = BSgenome.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38)

# 5. Compute deviations
dev <- computeDeviations(fragment_counts, motif_ix)

# 6. Analyze variability
variability <- computeVariability(dev)
plotVariability(variability)

Related Skills

  • differential-accessibility - Peak-level differential analysis with DiffBind
  • footprinting - TF footprinting with TOBIAS
  • atac-qc - Quality control before chromVAR
  • chip-seq/motif-analysis - Alternative motif enrichment approaches

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

adaptyv

免费

Support protein design with cloud laboratory testing for binding, expression, thermal stability, and enzyme activity. Covers sequence optimization, submitting experiments through the Adaptyv API, checking progress, and downloading experimental results.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Validate designed proteins with laboratory assays
  • Screen and redesign sequences for better solubility
  • Submit protein testing experiments through an API
FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills30802026年7月21日 更新

Build flexible daily plans that account for ADHD-related difficulties with time estimation and getting started. Narrow priorities to three tasks, add transition buffers, and choose small next actions that match the energy available that day.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Choosing three priorities for today
  • Planning a schedule with transition buffers
  • Finding a small first step when starting feels difficult
FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills30802026年7月21日 更新

aeon

免费

Build Python workflows for data recorded over time, including classification, forecasting, anomaly detection, and pattern search. Using aeon, the skill guides preprocessing, algorithm selection, feature extraction, and evaluation through interfaces compatible with scikit-learn.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Classify time series by their patterns
  • Forecast future values from historical data
  • Detect anomalies and change points
FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills30802026年7月21日 更新

Use a browser to research topics, extract page information, fill forms, and test websites. Guides agents through identifying page controls, interacting with web apps, saving screenshots or PDFs, and reusing saved login sessions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Researching topics and reading web articles
  • Filling and submitting online forms
  • Extracting page text and links
FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills30802026年7月21日 更新

Combine health measurements, exercise, sleep, nutrition, and mental health records to examine trends, unusual changes, and estimated risks. The skill produces personalized suggestions and text or interactive HTML reports using local data without external API calls.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Review health records together in a comprehensive report
  • Explore links between sleep, mood, exercise, and weight
  • Summarize estimated disease and nutrition risks
FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills30802026年7月21日 更新

alphafold

免费

Predict structures for designed protein sequences and protein complexes with AlphaFold2 or ColabFold. Inspect structure files and confidence scores to assess folding and chain interfaces, with guidance for local runs, Modal execution, and common prediction errors.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Check predicted folding of a designed protein sequence
  • Predict a binder–target protein complex
  • Review structure and interface confidence scores
FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills30802026年7月21日 更新

查看 FreedomIntelligence 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题